Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1

Comparison of the transluceny and masking properties of different composite resins

Farklı kompozit rezinlerin translüsensi ve maskeleme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
30–36
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the translucency parameter values change from 11.22 to 15.00 and the masking effect values change from 49.21 to 56.36 among the composite materials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the transluceny and masking properties of different composite resins.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this study, eight different composite materials were used and 10 samples of each material were prepared using stainless steel mold (8x2 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the translucency parameter values change from 11.22 to 15.00 and the masking effect values change from 49.21 to 56.36 among the composite materials.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:10 samples
⚙️Variables:Kompozit Rezin · Maskeleme Etkisi · Translüsensi Parametresi

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the transluceny and masking properties of different composite resins. Material and Methods: In this study, eight different composite materials were used and 10 samples of each material were prepared using stainless steel mold (8x2 mm). Translucency parameters of samples were determined by making measurements on the black and white backgrounds. Masking effect was calculated on the basis of the color difference between the specimen on a black background and black background itself. Data were analyzed by One-Way ANOVA and Tukey test. The correlation analysis (Pearson's Correlation Analysis) was used to examine the correlation between the translucency parameters and masking effect. Statistically significant level was based on p<0.05. Results: The significant differences were obtained among all composites in view of translucency and masking effect (p<0.001). It was found that the translucency parameter values change from 11.22 to 15.00 and the masking effect values change from 49.21 to 56.36 among the composite materials. Grandio Flow showed the highest translucency parameter value and Gradia Direct Anterior showed the highest masking effect. A negative correlation was found between translucency parameter and masking effect (p>0.05). Conclusion: When choice of restorative material was done during clinical application, not only the color of the restorative material but also translucency and masking feature should be took into account for obtaining the aesthetic which was similar to the restorated tooth.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı kompozit rezinlerin translüsensi ve maskeleme özelliklerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada 8 farklı rezin kompozit kullanılarak her bir materyalden 2 mm kalınlığında ve 8 mm çapında paslanmaz çelik kalıp kullanılarak 10’ar adet örnek hazırlandı. Örneklerin translüsensi parametreleri siyah ve beyaz arka planlar üzerinde ölçüm yapılarak tespit edildi. Maskeleme etkisi ise siyah bir arka plan ve siyah arka planın üzerinde bir örnek arasındaki renk farkı esas alınarak hesaplandı. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey testi kullanılarak yapıldı. Translüsensi parametresi ve maskeleme etkisi arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için korelasyon analizi yapıldı. İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p<0,05 olarak alındı. Bulgular: Translüsensi ve maskeleme etkisi açısından tüm kompozitler arasında anlamlı farklılıklar elde edildi (p<0,001). Kompozit materyaller arasındaki translüsensi parametre değerlerinin 11,22 ve 15,00 arasında ve maskeleme etkisi değerlerinin 49,21 ve 56,36 arasında değiştiği bulundu. Grandio Flow en yüksek translüsensi parametre değerine ve Gradia Direct Anterior en yüksek maskeleme etkisine sahipti. Translüsensi parametresi ve maskeleme etkisi arasında negatif bir ilişkinin bulunduğu tespit edildi (p>0,05). Sonuç: Klinik uygulamalarda restoratif materyal seçimi yapılırken restore edilecek dişe yakın estetiği elde etmek için materyalin renginin yanı sıra translüsensi ve maskeleme özelliği de dikkate alınmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, Y. P., AKGÜL, Y. N. (2013). Comparison of the transluceny and masking properties of different composite resins. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/901267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Azzopardi N, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Martin N, van Noort R. Effect of resin matrix composition on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent Mater 2009;25:1564–8.
  2. Johnston WM, Reisbick MH. Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater 1997;13:89–97.
  3. Kim IJ, Lee YK. Changes in color and color parameters of dental resin composites after polymerization. J Biomed Mater Res: Part B Appl Biomater 2007; 80B:541–6.
  4. Miyagawa Y, Powers JM, O’Brien WJ. Optical properties of direct restorative materials. J Dent Res 1981;60:890–4.
  5. Perez MM, Ghinea R, Ugarte-Alvan LI, Pulgar R, Paravina RD. Color and translucency in siloranebased resin composite compared to universal and nanofilled composites J Dent 2010;38S:e110-6. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819–22.
  6. Lee YK, Lu H, Powers JM. Changes in opalescence and fluorescence properties of resin composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater 2006;22:653 Ikeda T, Murata Y, Sano H. Translucency of opaque-shade resin composites. Am J Dent 2 004; 17:127-30.
  7. Kim SJ, Son HH, Cho BH, Lee IB, Um CM. Translucency and masking ability of various opaque-shade composite resins. J Dent 2009; 37:102-7.
  8. Ryan EA, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials J Can Dent Assoc 2010;76:a84. Kim JH, Lee YK, Powers JM. Influence of a series of organic and chemical substances on the translucency of resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2006;77:21–7.
  9. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79–86.
  10. Yu B, Lee YK. Influence of color parameters of resin composites on their translucency. Dent Mater 2008;24:1236–42.
  11. Doğan A, Yüzügüllü B. Renk seçiminde güncel teknolojik gelişmeler [Recent technological developments in color selection] Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2011;Supp 4:65-72.
  12. Schmitter M, Musotter K, Hassel A. Interexaminer reliability in the clinical measurement of L*c*h* values using a laminar spectrophotometer. Int J Prosthodont 2008.21:422-4
  13. Ikeda T, Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Fujita M, Sano H. Color and translucency of opaque-shades and body-shades of resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:170–3.
  14. Yu B, Lee YK. Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites J Dent 2008;36:840-6.
  15. Arimoto A, Naka