SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Hakan EREN
Beste İNCEOĞLU
Burcu KİRŞAN BÜYÜKKOÇAK
İrem EREN
Kaan ORHAN
Pages
167–173
Publication Date
2020-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anahtar kelimeler: KIBT, Endikasyon, FOV, KIBT Uygulamaları

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Objective: Recent researches provided an overview for advantages, disadvantages and indications/contraindications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as well as some thoughts on the current educational status of CBCT in dental schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method:1590 CBCT indications defined from 1503 patients and their reports retrieved from the archieves of the DMFR clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anahtar kelimeler: KIBT, Endikasyon, FOV, KIBT Uygulamaları
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:1503 hasta
⚙️Variables:CBCT · Indication · FOV

Özet

Abstract: Objective: Recent researches provided an overview for advantages, disadvantages and indications/contraindications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as well as some thoughts on the current educational status of CBCT in dental schools. Reviews of recent publications reveal that CBCT is an important tool in the diagnostic process, even it plays an integral role in treatment planning and outcome assessment at different departments like maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, periodontology and endodontics. The aim of present study is to find out the indications and the most frequently used ones by reviewing the indications of CBCT at Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) clinic, which were referred by other clinics/departments of the hospital. Materials and Method:1590 CBCT indications defined from 1503 patients and their reports retrieved from the archieves of the DMFR clinic. Besides; referral reports, and Field of View (FOV- region) were also noted. Results: CBCT imaging has mostly focused on applications for dental implant planning, impacted tooth extraction, orthodontic purposes and temporomandibular joint imaging. Conclusion:CBCT is a 3D diagnostic tool contributing additional information to the clinical situation if the appropriate indication is used with the right FOV selection. In addition, the recent spread of implant treatments has led to the use of CBCT for implant planning. Key words: CBCT, Indication, FOV, Applications of CBCT Öz Amaç:Son araştırmalar, Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi'nin (KIBT) avantajları, dezavantajları ve endikasyonları / kontrendikasyonları yanı sıra dişhekimliği okullarında verilen mevcut KIBT eğitimi ile ilgili geliştirilen fikirler hakkında genel bir bakış sağlamıştır. Son yayınların değerlendirmeleri KIBT'nin tanısal süreçte önemli bir araç olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Hatta maksillofasiyal cerrahi, ortodonti, periodontoloji ve endodonti gibi farklı bölümlerin tedavi planlama ve sonuç değerlendirmesinde ayrılmaz bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, hastanenin diğer klinikleri / bölümleri tarafından yönlendirilen Dentomaksillofasiyal Radyoloji (DMFR) kliniğindeki KIBT endikasyonlarını gözden geçirerek KIBT endikasyonları ile bunlardan en sık kullanılanları ortaya çıkarmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem:1503 hastadan 1590 KIBT endikasyonu tanımlandı ve raporları DMFR kliniğinin arşivlerinden alındı, sevk raporları ve İnceleme Alanı (FOV bölgesi) da not edildi. Bulgular:KIBT görüntüleme çoğunlukla implant planlaması, gömülü diş çekimi, ortodontik amaçlar ve temporomandibuler eklem görüntülemesi uygulamalarına odaklanmıştır. Sonuç:KIBT, uygun FOV bölgesi seçiminde uygun endikasyon kullanıldığında klinik duruma ek bilgi sağlayan 3B tanılama aracıdır. Ek olarak implant tedavilerinin yaygınlaşması, implant planlaması için KIBT kullanımının da artmasına yol açmıştır. Anahtar kelimeler: KIBT, Endikasyon, FOV, KIBT Uygulamaları

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, H., İNCEOĞLU, B., BÜYÜKKOÇAK, B. K., EREN, İ., ORHAN, K. (2020). EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2, 167–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/900971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Park JB. The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:663–666
  2. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J 1999;186:630–633
  3. Mayil M, Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. CBCT Images of Anatomic Landmarks in Maxillofacial Region MÜSBED 2014;4(4):232-240
  4. Shetty H, Hegde P, Shetty A, Hegde MN. CBCT Imaging- The Dentists Third Eye: A Literature Based Review. Indian Journal of Stomatology. 2014;5(3):95-101
  5. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):102–121
  6. Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA. TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013;3(1):80–83
  7. Schegerer A, Lechel U, Ritter M, Weisser G, Fink C, Brix G. Dose and Image Quality of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as Compared With Conventional Multislice Computed Tomography in Abdominal Imaging. Investigative Radiology. 49(10):675–684
  8. Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014;6:29–43
  9. Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry: What Dental Educators and Learners Should Know. J Dent Educ. 2012 Nov;76(11):1437-42
  10. Carter JB, Stone, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2016;74:668-79
  11. Temur KT, Hatipoglu O. Awareness And Use Of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Of Turkish Dentist. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2019;29(2):169-175
  12. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, et al. Comparison ofcone beam computed tomography imaging with physicalmeasures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93
  13. Eggers G, Klein J, Welzel T, et al. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:639-44
  14. Stuck BA, Hulse R, Barth TJ. Intraoperative cone beamcomputed tomography in the management of facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1171-5
  15. Tsapaki V, Radiation protection in dental radiology - Recent advances and future directions. Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:222-