Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Is a Universal Model of a ‘Good’ National Education System that brings Economic Returns Emerging?

Pages
61–72
Publication Date
2020-04-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on observing the education systems of countries with a solid track record on international assessments aimed to measure cognitive skills, we argue that there seems to be various common themes, and also highly distinctive paths to success among highly renowned education systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The consensus around the importance of educational quality on economic growth and societal development is more robust than ever.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Major studies such as Hanushek & Woessmann (2015; 2020) indicate that a nation’s aggregate cognitive skills, measured with international mathematics and science assessments such as TIMMS, PIRLS, and PISA, is indicative of its educational quality, which is a vital component for economic growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on observing the education systems of countries with a solid track record on international assessments aimed to measure cognitive skills, we argue that there seems to be various common themes, and also highly distinctive paths to success among highly renowned education systems.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler International Education · Educational Policy · Economic Development

Özet

Öz The consensus around the importance of educational quality on economic growth and societal development is more robust than ever. Major studies such as Hanushek & Woessmann (2015; 2020) indicate that a nation’s aggregate cognitive skills, measured with international mathematics and science assessments such as TIMMS, PIRLS, and PISA, is indicative of its educational quality, which is a vital component for economic growth. Such studies have also influenced the trajectory of international organizations so far as to include ‘quality education’ as one of the Sustainable Development Goals 2013 (United Nations, 2015). Therefore, by building on the studies asserting the importance of quality education and cognitive skills accumulation, we examine whether there is a universal model of a ‘good’ education system should look like is emerging. Based on observing the education systems of countries with a solid track record on international assessments aimed to measure cognitive skills, we argue that there seems to be various common themes, and also highly distinctive paths to success among highly renowned education systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M. L., KESKİN, H. A. (2020). Is a Universal Model of a ‘Good’ National Education System that brings Economic Returns Emerging?. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 61–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/9009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J., Dynarski, S., Kane, T., & Pathak, P. (2011). Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Bostons Charters and Pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699-748. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr017 Altinok, N., & Aydemir, A. (2017). Does one size fit all? The impact of cognitive skills on economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 53, 176-190. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.06.007 Barro, R., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1997).
  2. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1-26. doi:10.3386/w5151 Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic growth. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT. Bermeo, E. (2014). South Korea’s successful education system: Lessons and policy implications for Peru. Korean Social Science Journal, 41(2), 135-151. doi:10.1007/s40483-014-0019-0
  3. Besley, T. (2009). Assessing the quality of educational research in higher education: International perspectives. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense. Breton, T. R. (2011). The Quality vs. the Quantity of Schooling: What Drives Economic Growth?, Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 765–73.
  4. Brumm, H. J. (1996). The Human Capital Augmented Solow Model Revisited, Applied Economics Letters, 3(11), 711–14.
  5. Chakrabarti, R. (2013, December 02). South Korea's schools: Long days, high results. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-25187993
  6. Choi, A. (2015, December 22). What the best education systems are doing right. Retrieved January 10, 2019, from https://ideas.ted.com/what-the-best-education-systems-are-doing-right/ Chosunilbo. (2009, August 10). Korean Youth Study Longest Hours in OECD. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/08/10/ 2009081000200.html Denison, E.F., (1967). Why Growth Rates Differ; Postwar Experience in Nine Western Countries. The World Bank, Washington: D.C. Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2011). Are High-Quality Schools Enough to Increase Achievement Among the Poor? Evidence from the Harlem Childrens Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158-187. doi:10.1257/app.3.3.158 Erdelen, W. (2008). One Size Does Not Fit All. A World of Science, 6(4), 1-24. Retrieved January 8, 2019, from http://www.unesco.org/science/document/AWOS_Vol6_4web.pdf
  7. Fitzsimons P. (2017) Human Capital Theory and Education. In: Peters M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Singapore: Springer. Fox, D. (1983). Personal Theories of Teaching. Studies