Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2018 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

A Study on Assessing the Importance of Attributes for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Meme Kanseri Tanısı İçin Özniteliklerin Öneminin Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Pages
109–115
Publication Date
2018-08-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental studies showed that the best classification performance (98% accuracy) was achieved by applying the Random Forest algorithm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Breast cancer, one of the most common types of cancer, is a deadly disease affecting women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The learning process involving training and testing phases was performed by utilizing the 5-fold cross-validation technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental studies showed that the best classification performance (98% accuracy) was achieved by applying the Random Forest algorithm.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meme kanseri risk tahmini · özniteliklerin önemliliği · Özyinelemeli Özellik Eleme

Abstract

Breast cancer, one of the most common types of cancer, is a deadly disease affecting women. The importance of attributes was investigated by using the Recursive Feature Selection based on feature selection on Wisconsin breast cancer dataset, and then the machine learnings were performed by utilizing Random Forest and Logistic Regression classifier algorithms in the proposed study. The learning process involving training and testing phases was performed by utilizing the 5-fold cross-validation technique. Experimental studies showed that the best classification performance (98% accuracy) was achieved by applying the Random Forest algorithm.

Özet

En yaygın kanser türlerinden biri olan meme kanseri kadınları etkileyen ölümcül bir hastalıktır. Önerilen çalışmada, Wisconsin meme kanseri veriseti üzerinde öznitelik seçimine dayalı Özyinelemeli Özellik Seçimi metodu kullanılarak özniteliklerin önemliliği araştırılmış ve sonrasında Rastele Orman ve Lojistik Regresyon sınıflandırıcı algoritmaları kullanılarak makine öğrenmeleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Eğitim ve test aşamalarını içeren öğrenme süreci 5 katlı çapraz doğrulama tekniği kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Deneysel çalışmalar, Rastgele Orman algoritması kullanılarak en iyi sınıflandırma başarısı ( %98 doğruluk) elde edildiğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYOL, K. (2018). A Study on Assessing the Importance of Attributes for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 109–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/899614

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Breast cancer basics, http://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/guide/understanding-breast-cancer-basics, Accessed 20 June 2017.
  2. El-Akkad S.M., Amer M.H., Lin G.S., Sabbah R.S., Godwin J.T., Pattern of cancer in Saudi Arabs referred to King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Cancer 58, 1172–1178, 1986.
  3. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A., Cancer statistics, CA Cancer J Clin 67, 7-30, 2017.
  4. Papageorgiou E.I., Subramanian J., Karmegam A., Papandrianos N., A risk management model for familial breastcancer: A new application using Fuzzy CognitiveMap method, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 122, 123–135, 2015.
  5. Lope V., Martín M., Castelló A., Casla S., Ruiz A., Baena-Cañada J.M., Casas A.M., Calvo L., Bermejo B., Muñoz M., Ramos M., de Juan-Ferré A., Jara C., Antón A., Jimeno M.Á., Lluch A., Antolín S., García-Sáenz J.Á., Estévez P., Arriola-Arellano E., Gavilá J., Pérez-Gómez B., Carrasco E., Pollán M., GEICAM, the Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Physical activity and breast cancer risk by pathological subtype, Gynecologic Oncology 144, 577–585, 2017.
  6. Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S. and Vapnik, V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines, Mach Learn 46, 389-422, 2002.
  7. Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. "Applied logistic regression, 2nd ed.", Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Canada, 2000.
  8. Breiman, L. Random forests, Mach Learn 45, 5-32, 2001. Globocan 2012:
  9. Estimated Cancer Incidince, Mortaliyty and Prevalence Worldwide 2012, http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  10. Powell M., Jamshidian F., Cheyne K., Nititham J., Prebil L.A., Ereman R., Assessing Breast Cancer Risk Models in Marin County, a Population With High Rates of Delayed Childbirth, Clinical Breast Cancer 14, 212-220, 2014.
  11. Costantino J.P., Gail M.H., Pee D., Anderson S., Redmond C.K., Benichou J., Wieand H.S., Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence, J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 1541-1548, 1999.
  12. Parmigiani G., Berry D., Aguilar O., Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62, 145-58, 1998.
  13. Tyrer J., Duffy S.W., Cuzick J., A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23, 1111-1130, 2004.
  14. Al Diab A., Qureshi S., Al Saleh K.A., AlQahtani F.H., Aleem A., AlSaif A., Qureshi V.F., Qureshi M.R., Studies on the methods of diagnosis and biomarkers used in early detection of breast cancer in the