Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2019 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Shale Gas Extraction And Treatment Of Shale Gas Wastewater

Kaya Gazı Ekstraksiyonu Ve Kaya Gazı Atıksuyunun Arıtımı

Pages
106–114
Publication Date
2019-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The treatability of shale gas wastewater by evaporation with the mechanical vapor compression, membrane distillation, reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, advanced chemical treatment methods, and biological treatment methods have been investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, shale gas is considered as a new source of energy and researches on shale gas extraction continue to increase all over the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:About 10% to 80% of the water injected into the rock forms returns back and emerges as wastewater.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The treatability of shale gas wastewater by evaporation with the mechanical vapor compression, membrane distillation, reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, advanced chemical treatment methods, and biological treatment methods have been investigated.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kaya gazı ekstraksiyonu · kaya gazı atıksuyu · membran prosesler

Abstract

Nowadays, shale gas is considered as a new source of energy and researches on shale gas extraction continue to increase all over the world. Shale gas extraction uses high volumes of pressurized water which are injected in the shale rock during the horizontal and vertical drilling. About 10% to 80% of the water injected into the rock forms returns back and emerges as wastewater. In order to minimize the volume of generated wastewater, a pre-treatment of shale gas wastewater is on a great importance making their reuse possible in extraction studies. On the other hand, shale gas wastewater contains the high amounts of total dissolved solids, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and organic matter and it must be treated before being discharged. In this review, shale gas extraction methods, the properties and treatment methods of the wastewater produced during extraction were examined. The treatability of shale gas wastewater by evaporation with the mechanical vapor compression, membrane distillation, reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, advanced chemical treatment methods, and biological treatment methods have been investigated.

Özet

Günümüzde kaya gazı yeni bir enerji kaynağı olarak ele alınmakta ve kaya gazı ekstraksiyonuna yönelik araştırmalar tüm dünyada hız kesmeden devam etmektedir. Düşey ve yatay sondajın birlikte kullanıldığı ekstraksiyon çalışmalarında kaya gazının açığa çıkarılabilmesi için kaya formlarına yüksek hacimlerde basınçlı su enjekte edilmektedir. Kaya formlarına enjekte edilen suyun geri çekilmesi ile kullanılan suyun yaklaşık %10’u ila %80’i atıksu olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Oluşacak atıksu hacmini minimize edebilmek için kaya gazı atıksuyunun ön arıtımı yapılarak ekstraksiyon çalışmalarında yeniden kullanımı son derece önemlidir. Diğer yandan kaya gazı atıksuyu yüksek miktarlarda toplam çözünmüş katı madde, ağır metal, hidrokarbon ve organik madde içerir ve bu nedenle atıksuyun deşarj edilmeden önce arıtılması gerekmektedir. Bu derleme çalışmasında kaya gazı ekstraksiyonunda kullanılan yöntemler ve ekstraksiyon esnasında üretilen atıksuyun özellikleri ve arıtım metodları irdelenmiştir. Kaya gazı atıksuyunun mekanik buhar kompresyonu ile buharlaştırılması, membran distilasyonu, ters ozmos, ileri ozmos, ileri kimyasal arıtma yöntemleri ve biyolojik arıtma yöntemleri ile arıtılabilirliği araştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAN, H. S., TURAN, N. B., ENGİN, G. Ö. (2019). Shale Gas Extraction And Treatment Of Shale Gas Wastewater. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 106–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/899571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. “Key World Energy Statistics 2012,” Key World Energy Statistics, 2013. [2] S. Pacala, “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5686, pp. 968–972, 2004. [3] M. Melikoglu, “Vision 2023: Forecasting Turkeys natural gas demand between 2013 and 2030,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 22, pp. 393–400, 2013. [4] V. A. Kuuskraa, “Natural Gas Resources, Unconventional,” Encyclopedia of Energy, pp. 257–272, 2004. [5] Q. Wang, X. Chen, A. N. Jha, and H. Rogers, “Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 30, pp. 1–28, 2014. [6] S. D. Golding, C. J. Boreham, and J. S. Esterle, “Stable isotope geochemistry of coal bed and shale gas and related production waters: A review,” International Journal of Coal Geology, vol. 120, pp. 24–40, 2013. [7] M. Melikoglu, “Shale gas: Analysis of its role in the global energy market,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 37, pp. 460–468, 2014. [8] D. M. Kargbo, R. G. Wilhelm, and D. J. Campbell, “Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 15, pp. 5679–5684, 2010. [9] R. A. Kerr, “Natural Gas From Shale Bursts Onto the Scene,” Science, vol. 328, no. 5986, pp. 1624–1626, 2010. [10] “Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources.” [Online]. Available: https://www.bing.com/cr?IG=A691EDAF1780442E86B1EDF22E3984CE&CID=3660B06AF0D26492028FBBA9F17D6598&rd=1&h=Qv8EDLVknr03YA3v-iEi1bj89d6oJ371cJEWh4_EL-w&v=1&r=https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/pdf/overview.pdf&p=DevEx,5068.1. [Accessed: 31-Mar-2018]. [11] K.A.N. Bozdogan, T. Erten, Y. H. Iztan, A. Cubukcu, M. G. D. Korucu, "Anadolu Diyarbakir Bolgesi Paleozoyik birimlerin stratigrafisi ve petrol potansiyeli", Turkiye 10. Petrol Kongresi ve Sergisi Bildiri Kitabi. Ankara, 125-139, 1994. [12] A. Aydemir, “Comparison of Mississippian Barnett Shale, Northern-Central Texas, USA and Silurian Dadas Formation in Southeast Turkey,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 81–93, 2011. [13] “Turkey's shale gas hopes draw growing interest,” Reuters, 18-Feb-2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/turkey-shale/turkeys-shale-gas-hopes-draw-growing-interest-idUSL6N0BI8CQ20130218. [Accessed: 31-Mar-2018]. [14] S. Jenner and A