Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2019 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

Modeling Relationship Maps for The Factors of Purchasing Management System According to Selected Key Drivers Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

Pages
515–523
Publication Date
2019-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results will be presented at the end of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Strategic management is the philosophy of the creation which provides a goal, a plan and a model for the competitive advantage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Companies define their own goals and generate the plan for goal according to this management philosophy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results will be presented at the end of the study.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Purchasing Management System · Fuzzy Cognitive Map · Relationship Maps for Cost

Abstract

Strategic management is the philosophy of the creation which provides a goal, a plan and a model for the competitive advantage. Companies define their own goals and generate the plan for goal according to this management philosophy. However, company can utilize successively from this philosophy so long as it is able to be adapted to all management systems such as product, inventory, manufacturing and etc... Purchasing management system is the one of them. It is a basic management unit where decisions, goals and plans are structured according to production and customer requirements which give the competitive advantage to each company. All of them can be managed strategically by being focused on the appropriate purchasing conditions including low-cost, high quality, and on-time delivery. In this study, we will determine variables and the relationships between them which affect in achieving the strategies of the company in terms of purchasing management system. Fuzzy cognitive mapping method will be selected in order to find them out because this method creates a map by using some strategies for system. The results will be presented at the end of the study.

Özet

Strategic management is the philosophy of the creation which provides a goal, a plan and a model for the competitive advantage. Companies define their own goals and generate the plan for goal according to this management philosophy. However, company can utilize successively from this philosophy so long as it is able to be adapted to all management systems such as product, inventory, manufacturing and etc... Purchasing management system is the one of them. It is a basic management unit where decisions, goals and plans are structured according to production and customer requirements which give the competitive advantage to each company. All of them can be managed strategically by being focused on the appropriate purchasing conditions including low-cost, high quality, and on-time delivery. In this study, we will determine variables and the relationships between them which affect in achieving the strategies of the company in terms of purchasing management system. Fuzzy cognitive mapping method will be selected in order to find them out because this method creates a map by using some strategies for system. The results will be presented at the end of the study.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNACAN, T., TOPAL, B., GÖKSU, A. (2019). Modeling Relationship Maps for The Factors of Purchasing Management System According to Selected Key Drivers Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 515–523. https://ajindex.com/articles/899536

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Azadeh, M.A, Harandi, S.J., Izadbakhsh, H., “Re-engineering design of purchasing system by BPS and PCA” Industrial Informatics 2006 IEEE International Conference, pp. 863-869, 2007
  2. Baier, C., Hartmann, E., Moser, R., “Strategic alignment and purchasing efficacy: an exploratory analysis of their impact on financial performance”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 44, pp. 36-52, 2008
  3. Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., Platts, K.,“Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 20, pp.754-771, 2000
  4. Carr, A., Pearson, J., ”The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 22, pp. 1032–1053, 2002
  5. Chen, I.J., Paulraj, A., Lado, A., “Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22, pp. 505–523, 2004
  6. Chrysostomos, S., Stylios, D., Groumpos, P.P., “Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: A model for intelligent supervisory control systems”, Computers in Industry, pp. 229-238, 1999
  7. Cousins, P.D., Lawson, B., Squire, B., “An empirical taxonomy of purchasing functions”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 26, pp. 775-794, 2006
  8. Das, A., Narasimhan, R.,“Purchasing Competence and Its Relationship with Manufacturing Performance” The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 36, pp. 17-20, 2000
  9. Easton, L., Murphy, D.J., Pearson, J.N., “Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 8, pp. 123-134, 2002
  10. Ellram, L.M., Zsidisin, G.A., Siferd, S.P., Stanly M.J., “The Impact of Purchasing and Supply Management Activities on Corporate Success” The Journal Of Supply Chain Management, pp. 4-17, 2002
  11. Emiliani, M.L., Stec, D.J., Grasso L.P., “Unintended responses to a traditional purchasing performance metric” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 10, pp.150-156, 2005
  12. Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R. and Voss, C., “Performance Measurement in Service Business” CIMA, London, 1991
  13. Gonzalez-Benito, J., “A theory of purchasing’s contribution to business performance” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, pp. 901-917, 2007
  14. Hacisalihoglu, M., “Development of a procurement model to en