SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Soil Studies / 2017 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Comparing the Nutritional Status of Organic and Conventional Oil-Bearing Rose (Rosa Damascena Mill.) Gardens in Lakes Region With Leaf and Flower Analyzes

İbrahim ERDAL
Hilal MUNDUZ
Pages
26–31
Publication Date
2017-09-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, flower nutrient concentration of conventional gardens were higher for all examined nutrients and differences between organic and conventional gardens for nitrogen, potassium, calcium and iron concentrations were significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to compare nutritional status of organic and conventional oil-bearing rose (Rosa damascena Mill) gardens in Lakes Region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:And these results were significant in terms of nitrogen, manganese, and zinc concentrations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, flower nutrient concentration of conventional gardens were higher for all examined nutrients and differences between organic and conventional gardens for nitrogen, potassium, calcium and iron concentrations were significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Conventional farming · organic farming · nutrient

Özet

In this study, it was aimed to compare nutritional status of organic and conventional oil-bearing rose (Rosa damascena Mill) gardens in Lakes Region. For this, leaf and flower samples were collected from oil-bearing rose gardens in Lakes Region, Isparta. In these samples nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, manganese, copper and boron analyses were made. When the leaf analysis results obtained from conventional and organic production areas were compared, it was seen that nutrient concentrations of the leaves from conventional gardens were higher generally. And these results were significant in terms of nitrogen, manganese, and zinc concentrations. Similarly, flower nutrient concentration of conventional gardens were higher for all examined nutrients and differences between organic and conventional gardens for nitrogen, potassium, calcium and iron concentrations were significant.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDAL, İ., MUNDUZ, H. (2017). Comparing the Nutritional Status of Organic and Conventional Oil-Bearing Rose (Rosa Damascena Mill.) Gardens in Lakes Region With Leaf and Flower Analyzes. Soil Studies, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 26–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/898074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baydar H, Kazas S (2013). Yağ Gülü ve Isparta Gülcülüğü. Gülbirlik Yayınları 1. El-Jendoubi H, Abadía J, Abadía A (2013). Assessment of nutrient removal in bearing peach trees (Prunus Persica L. Batsch) based on whole tree analysis. Plant and Soil, 369(1- 2), 421-437.
  2. Entz M H, Guilford R, Gulden R (2001). Crop yield and soil nutrient status on 14 organic farms in the eastern portion of the northern Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 81(2), 351-354.
  3. Erdal İ, Ertek A, Şenyiğit U, Yılmaz H İ (2006). Effects of different irrigation programs and nitrogen levels on nitrogen concentration, uptake and utilization in processing tomatoes (Lycopersicum Esculentum). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46, 1653-1660
  4. Gosling P, Shepherd M (2005). Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105(1), 425-432.
  5. Güçdemir İ H (2006). Türkiye Gübre ve Gübreleme Rehberi, 5. Baskı T.C. Tarım ve Köy işleri Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Araştırma Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  6. Jones Jr J.B, Wolf B, H A Mills (1991). Plant Analysis Handbook. A Practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc, Athens Ga Kacar B, Inal A (2008). Plant Analysis. Nobel Pres, (1241), 891. Koseva D (1978). Effect of fertilizers on the utilization and removal of NPK by kazanlik rose. Rast. Nauki, 15 (8), 107-118.
  7. Küçükyumuk Z, Erdal İ (2008). Evaluation of nutritional status of rose gardens in Isparta district. 4. National Plant Nutrition Fertilizer and Congress. 8-10 Septembre. Konya- Turkey. 554-562. Mäder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296 (5573), 1694-1697.
  8. Mengel K, Kirkby E A, Kosegarten H, Appel T (2001). Principles of Plant Nutrition (pp. 397-434).
  9. Springer Netherlands. Pang X P, Letey J (2000). Organic farming challenge of timing nitrogen availability to crop nitrogen requirements. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(1), 247-253.
  10. Ryan M H, Derrick J W, Dann P R (2004). Grain mineral concentrations and yield of wheat grown under organic and conventional management. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 84(3), 207-216
  11. Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley J A (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature. 485 (7397): 229-232.
  12. Singh D V, Ram M (1987). Effect of spacing, extent of