Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 16

The Investigation of Socioscientific Issues Scenarios: A Content Analysis Research

Sosyobilimsel Konu Senaryolarının İncelenmesi: Bir İçerik Analizi Çalışması

Pages
1968–1991
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found that there is consensus on selecting the issues which are relevance to real life, related to target curriculum, and which offer opportunities for debate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine how socioscientific issues (SSI) scenarios have been written in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three criteria were defined to identify socioscientific issue scenarios: Studies which have been published in the last 5 years and in pre-reviewed journals and identified the issue as socioscientific issue scenario.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found that there is consensus on selecting the issues which are relevance to real life, related to target curriculum, and which offer opportunities for debate.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyobilimsel argümantasyon · Sosyobilimsel konular · Sosyobilimsel konu senaryoları

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how socioscientific issues (SSI) scenarios have been written in the literature. Three criteria were defined to identify socioscientific issue scenarios: Studies which have been published in the last 5 years and in pre-reviewed journals and identified the issue as socioscientific issue scenario. Relevant databases were reviewed using both Turkish and English versions of "socioscientific issues", "socioscientific issue scenarios" and "socioscientific argumentation" keywords. After the literature review fifteen scenarios included in the seven articles selected with lottery were analyzed with content analysis. Analyzes showed that there is no consensus on how much and in which order the objective, positive, or negative information should be included in socioscientific issue scenarios. However, it was found that there is consensus on selecting the issues which are relevance to real life, related to target curriculum, and which offer opportunities for debate. It is believed that the present study will contribute to the writing of socioscientific issue scenarios.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatürdeki sosyobilimsel konu (SBK) senaryolarının nasıl yazıldığının incelenmesidir. SBK senaryolarını içeren çalışmaların tespit edilmesi amacıyla yapılan literatür taramasında üç temel kriter belirlenmiştir: (a) Çalışmaların son beş yılda yayınlanmış olması, (b) hakemli dergilerde yayınlanan çalışmalar olması, (c) SBK içeriklerinin çalışmalarda senaryo olarak tanımlanması. İlgili veri tabanları “sosyobilimsel konular”, “sosyobilimsel konu senaryoları” ve “sosyobilimsel argümantasyon” anahtar kelimelerinin hem Türkçe hem de İngilizce versiyonları kullanılarak taranmıştır. Literatür taraması sonucunda kura yöntemi ile seçilen yedi makale içerisinde yer alan on beş SBK senaryosu içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Analizler, SBK senaryoları yazılırken, sosyobilimsel konu ile ilgili tarafsız, olumlu ya da olumsuz bilgilere ne derece ve hangi sırayla yer verilmesi gerektiği noktasında bir fikir birliği olmadığını göstermiştir. Ancak gerçek yaşamla ilişkili olan, insanlık için önem arz eden, tartışma fırsatı sunan ve hedef öğretim programı ile ilişkili konuların seçilmesi noktalarında bir uyum olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Mevcut çalışmanın SBK senaryolarının yazılması ve SBK temelli öğretimlerde bu senaryoların kullanılması açısından literatüre katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATABEY, N., TOPÇU, M. S., ÇİFTÇİ, A. (2018). The Investigation of Socioscientific Issues Scenarios: A Content Analysis Research. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 16, 1968–1991. https://ajindex.com/articles/897045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Atabey, N., ve Topçu, M. S. (2017). The development of a socioscientific issues-based curriculum unit for middle school students: Global warming issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(3), 153-170.
  2. Bosser, U., ve Lindahl, M. (2017). Students’ positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007-/s11165-017-9627-1.
  3. Carson, K., ve Dawson, V. (2016). A teacher professional development model for teaching socioscientific issues. Teaching science, 62(1), 28-35.
  4. Dawson, V. (2015). Western Australian high school students’ understandings about the socioscientific issue of climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1024-1043.
  5. Dawson, V., ve Carson, K. (2017). Using climate change scenarios to assess high school students’ argumentation skills. Research in Science ve Technological Education, 35(1), 1-16.
  6. Dolan, T. J., Nichols, B. H., ve Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Using socioscientifıc issues in primary classes. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 1-12.
  7. Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., ve Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315.
  8. Emery, K., Harlow, D., Whitmer, A., ve Gaines, S. (2017). Compelling evidence: An influence on middle school students’ accounts that may impact decision-making about socioscientific issues. Environmental Education Research, 23(8), 1115-1129.
  9. Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A., ve Kaptan, F. (2018). Sosyobilimsel durum temelli öğretim yaklaşımının argümantasyon becerilerinin gelişimine katkısı: Bir karma yöntem araştırması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,37(1),1-19. Fleiss,. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 378-382.
  10. Genel, A., ve Topçu, M. S. (2016) Turkish preservice science teachers’ socioscientific issues-based teaching practices in middle school science classrooms. Research in Science ve Technological Education, 34(1), 105-123.
  11. Gustafsson, B., ve Öhman, J. (2013).DEQUAL: A tool for investigating deliberative qualities in students’ socioscientific conversations. International Journal of Environmental ve Science Education, 8(2), 319-338.
  12. Halim, M., ve Saat, R. M. (2017). Exploring students’ understanding in making a decision on a socioscientific issu