Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 26

Moderation Effect Of Recovery Strategies On The Relationship Between Brand Hate And Its Possible Outcomes

Marka Nefreti ve Olası Sonuçları Üzerinde İşletme Telafi Süreçlerinin Düzenleyici Etkisi

Pages
4101–4133
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is revealed that recovery strategies (apology, compensation and voice) put forward by companies are not be able to decrease the relationship between brand hate and brand rejection, retaliation or negative word of mouth (nWOM) From this point of view, it is seen that no matter what kind of compensation service the consumer receives from the hated brand prevails in the process (as hate is the strongest negative emotion) and is unable to return the customer to his former attitude

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the limited number of studies in the literature, in this study, the concept of brand hate and its possible outcomes (brand rejection, negative word of mouth, retaliation) were examined in the moderation effect of recovery strategies (apology, compensation and voice).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study is a quantitative descriptive study and it is reached to 213 consumers who had hate relationship with brands.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is revealed that recovery strategies (apology, compensation and voice) put forward by companies are not be able to decrease the relationship between brand hate and brand rejection, retaliation or negative word of mouth (nWOM) From this point of view, it is seen that no matter what kind of compensation service the consumer receives from the hated brand prevails in the process (as hate is the strongest negative emotion) and is unable to return the customer to his former attitude
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:marka nefreti · marka öcü · marka reddi

Abstract

Due to the limited number of studies in the literature, in this study, the concept of brand hate and its possible outcomes (brand rejection, negative word of mouth, retaliation) were examined in the moderation effect of recovery strategies (apology, compensation and voice). The study is a quantitative descriptive study and it is reached to 213 consumers who had hate relationship with brands. Convinient sampling method was used and the data obtained were subjected to data analysis such as Explanatory, Confirmatory Factor analysis and Path Analysis, using statistical package programme of SPSS 19 and AMOS 23. The findings of the study indicate that consumers who have a brand hate are showing respectively a negative word of mouth, brand rejection and brand retaliation. In addition, it is revealed that recovery strategies (apology, compensation and voice) put forward by companies are not be able to decrease the relationship between brand hate and brand rejection, retaliation or negative word of mouth (nWOM) From this point of view, it is seen that no matter what kind of compensation service the consumer receives from the hated brand prevails in the process (as hate is the strongest negative emotion) and is unable to return the customer to his former attitude

Özet

Literatürde az sayıda çalışma olması nedeniyle, çalışmamızda marka aşkı kavramının zıddı olan marka nefreti kavramı incelenmiş ve marka nefreti ile olası sonuçları arasında (marka reddi, negatif WOM, marka öcü) işletmelerin telafi süreçlerinin (tazmin, özür dileme, kendini ifade edebilme) düzenleyici bir etkisi olup olmayacağı araştırılmıştır. Çalışma, kantitatif tanımsal bir araştırma olup, çalışmada 213, markayla nefret ilişkisi yaşamış tüketiciye ulaşılmıştır. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılan araştırmada, elde edilen veriler, Açıklayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör analizi, Yol Analizi gibi ileri bazı analiz yöntemleri ile SPSS 19 ve AMOS 23 paket programları kullanılarak veri analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, tercih ettiği marka ile nefret boyutuna gelmiş negatif bir ilişki yaşayan tüketicilerde, sırasıyla marka ile ilgili etrafındaki kişilere negatif yönde iletişim yapma (nWOM), markayı reddetme ve markanın ürün ve/veya hizmetlerine karşı bilinçli bir şekilde zarar verme eğilimi olarak adlandırılan markadan öc alma durumlarının geliştiği görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte işletmelerin ortaya koydukları tazmin, özür dileme ve kendini ifade edebilme telafi stratejilerinin, marka nefreti yaşayan tüketicilerin ortaya koydukları reddetme, öc alma veya negatif iletişim yapma davranışlarının azalmasında herhangi bir etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür. Buradan hareketle tüketicinin nefret boyutunda bir ilişki yaşadığı markadan, ne türlü bir telafi hizmeti alırsa alsın, kuvvetli bir negatif duygu olan nefretin süreçte hakim geldiği ve müşteriyi eski tutumuna döndüremediği yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖRS, M., KAYTAZ, M. (2020). Moderation Effect Of Recovery Strategies On The Relationship Between Brand Hate And Its Possible Outcomes. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 26, 4101–4133. https://ajindex.com/articles/896368

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alba, J.W. ve Lutz, R.J. (2013). Broadening (and narrowing) the scope of brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 265-268.
  2. Albert, N., Merunka, D., ve Valette-Florence, P. (2008). When consumers love their brands. Exploring the concept and its dimensions. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1062– 1075. Bagozzi, R. Ve Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
  3. Barlow, J. ve Moller, C. (1996). A complaint is a gift: Using customer feedback as a strategic tool. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Baruönü Latif F. Ö and Uslu A. (2019). Building e-loyalty for e-retailers: role of justice perception and consumer forgiveness. Middle East J. Management, 6(3), 298-317
  4. Batra R, Ahuvia A. ve Bagozzi R (2012) Brand love.Journal of Marketing, 76(2) 1-16.
  5. Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. and Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=S0rkL_Unl-cC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Ben- Ze%E2%80%99ev,+A.+(2000).+The+subtlety+of+emotions.+Cambridge,+MA:+MIT+Press.&ots= mebM0zLvlK&sig=i7-St2AbJNjG1wxu_r8EiUHSf2c#v=onepage&q=Ben- Ze%E2%80%99ev%2CCambridge%2CMA%3AMIT Press.&f=false adresinden erişilmiştir. Bennett, R. (1997). Anger, catharsis, and purchasing behavior following aggressive customer complaints. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(2), 156–172.
  6. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H. ve Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: Unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54, 71–84.
  7. Blodgett, J. G., Granbois, D. H. ve Walters, R. G. (1993). The effects of perceived justice on complainants' negative word-of-mouth behavior and repatronage intentions. Journal of Retailing, 69(4), 399–428.
  8. Breivik, E. Ve Thorbjørnsen, H. (2008). Consumer brand relationships: an investigation of two alternative models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 443-472.
  9. Bryson, D., Atwal, G. ve Hultén, P. (2013). Towards the conceptualisation of the antecedents of extreme negative affect towards luxury brands. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16, 393-405.
  10. Carroll, B. ve Ahuvia, A. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17, 79-89.
  11. Casidy, R. and Shin, H. (2015). The effects of harm directions and service recovery strategies on customer forgiveness and negative word-of-mouth intention