Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: Pandemi Özel Sayısı

Investigation of Anxiety and Peritraumatic Distress Levels in Context of Various Variables through Covid-19 Outbreak: Turkey, the UK and the USA Comparison

Covid-19 Salgın Sürecinde Kaygı ve Peri-travmatik Stres Düzeyinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Bağlamında İncelenmesi: Türkiye, İngiltere ve Amerika Karşılaştırması

Pages
3221–3244
Publication Date
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This suggests that the level of anxiety is affected more by political decisions, preventive measures and social environment rather than by common cultural characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aimed to gather socio-demographic information, compliance with personal/governmental precautionary measures from Turkish nationals (age 18 or older) reside in Turkey, the UK and the USA to investigate and compare the effects on peritraumatic distress and anxiety levels within these coun-tries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Peritraumatic Stress and Anxiety Levels are measured by Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). 70 participants from Turkey, 63 from the UK and 67 from the USA have participated in this causal-comparative study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This suggests that the level of anxiety is affected more by political decisions, preventive measures and social environment rather than by common cultural characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Covid-19 · pandemi · anksiyete

Abstract

The study aimed to gather socio-demographic information, compliance with personal/governmental precautionary measures from Turkish nationals (age 18 or older) reside in Turkey, the UK and the USA to investigate and compare the effects on peritraumatic distress and anxiety levels within these coun-tries. Peritraumatic Stress and Anxiety Levels are measured by Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). 70 participants from Turkey, 63 from the UK and 67 from the USA have participated in this causal-comparative study. According to the statistical analy-sis, even though there was no difference between three sample groups according to the STAI-State and PDI scores; the analysis showed that the STAI-Trait points of Turkey sample were higher than the other countries (p<.01). This study identified variables such as being a woman, living alone, trusting official statements, and positive test results from relatives or acquaintances as factors that affect anxiety level. However, these factors differ when evaluated within the scope of country-based responses. This suggests that the level of anxiety is affected more by political decisions, preventive measures and social environment rather than by common cultural characteristics.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye, İngiltere ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde (ABD) ikamet eden Türk vatandaşlarının (18 yaş ve üstü) sosyo-demografik bilgi ve Covid-19 salgın sürecinde hükümet ve bireylerin kendileri tarafından alınan önlemlere ilişkin algılarının alınması sonrasında; peri-travmatik stres ve kaygı düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada peri-travmatik stres ve kaygı düzeyleri Peri-travmatik Stres Envanteri ve Durumluk ve Sürekli Kaygı Ölçeği ile ölçülmüştür. Söz konusu ülkelerle yapılan bu nedensel karşılaştırmalı çalışmaya Türkiye'den 70, İngiltere'den 63 ve ABD'den 67 katılımcı katılmıştır. İstatistiksel analize göre Durumluk Kaygı Ölçeği ve Peritravmatik Stres Ölçeği puanlarında ülkeler arasında bir farklılık tespit edilmezken, Türkiye’deki katılımcıların Sürekli Kaygı Ölçeği toplam puanlarının diğer gruplara göre yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<.01). Bu çalışma kadın olmak, yalnız yaşamak, resmi kurumların açıklamalarına güven duymak, akraba veya tanıdıkların pozitif test sonuçları gibi değişkenleri kaygı düzeyini etkileyen faktörler olarak belirlemiştir. Ancak bu faktörler ülke bazında verilen yanıtlar kapsamında değerlendirildiğinde farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu durum kaygı düzeyinin ortak kültürel özelliklerden ziyade siyasi kararlardan, önleyici tedbirlerden ve sosyal çevreden daha fazla etkilendiği düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAGLAR, E. E., HAMZAOĞLU, N., SANAL, Y., KURTÇA, T. T. (2021). Investigation of Anxiety and Peritraumatic Distress Levels in Context of Various Variables through Covid-19 Outbreak: Turkey, the UK and the USA Comparison. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: Pandemi Özel Sayısı, 3221–3244. https://ajindex.com/articles/895972

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ann-Herring, D., and Sattenspiel, L. (2007). Social contexts, syndemics, and infectious disease in northern Aboriginal populations. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association, 19(2), 190-202.
  2. American Psychological Association (2020). Stress in the Time of COVID-19. https://www.apa.org/news/preSd/releases/streSd/2020/streSd-in-america-covid.pdf Last retrieved date: 28.05.2020.
  3. Asmundson G.J. and Taylor, S. (2020). How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know. J Anxiety Disord. 71, 102211. Başoǧlu, M., Şalcioǧlu, E., and Livanou, M. (2002). Traumatic stresd responses in earthquake survivors in Turkey. Journal of Traumatic StreSd: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 15(4), 269-276.
  4. Benight, C. C., Swift, E., Sanger, J., Smith, A., and Zeppelin, D. (1999). Coping self‐efficacy as a mediator of distress following a natural disaster. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2443-2464.
  5. Bonanno, G. A., Ho, S. M., Chan, J. C., Kwong, R. S., Cheung, C. K., Wong, C. P., and Wong, V. C. (2008). Psychological resilience and dysfunction among hospitalized survivors of the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: a latent class approach. Health Psychology, 27(5), 659. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet., 395(1022), 912-920.
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  8. Brunet A, Weiss DS, Metzler TJ, Best SR, Neylan TC, Rogers C, et al. (2001). The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: A proposed measure of PTSD criterion A2. Am J Psychiatry, 158: 1480–1485.
  9. Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., and Landau, M. J. (2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta‐analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12005
  10. Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., and Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID- 19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 112934. Chen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong,