SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kütüphaneciliği / 2006 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Cognitive Structure and Processeson Information Seeking

Bilişsel Yapının ve İşlemlerin Bilgi Arama Davranışı Üzerine Etkisi

Nazan Özenç Uçak
Şemsa Olşen Güzeldere
Pages
7–28
Publication Date
2006-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This viewpoint has emphazised on cognitive processes and emotional motivations in information seeking behaviour In this paper, user's cognitive structure, relevance, information seeking behaviour and the relations among them are examined

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Early information retrieval systems had been developed by working on the system and its outputs by ignoring the user.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At theend of 1970 s and in the beginning of 1980 s it was realised that the cognitive and affective aspects of the user have an effect upon the interaction between the system and the user, and the information seeking behaviour The studies related with user's information seeking behaviour and needs came to focus and a new viewpoint which is called cognitive viewpoint was applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This viewpoint has emphazised on cognitive processes and emotional motivations in information seeking behaviour In this paper, user's cognitive structure, relevance, information seeking behaviour and the relations among them are examined
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilgi Arama Davranışı · Bilişsel Yaklaşım · Bilişsel Yapı

Abstract

Early information retrieval systems had been developed by working on the system and its outputs by ignoring the user. However, traditional processing and organization of the information are different from those in user's mind. At theend of 1970 s and in the beginning of 1980 s it was realised that the cognitive and affective aspects of the user have an effect upon the interaction between the system and the user, and the information seeking behaviour The studies related with user's information seeking behaviour and needs came to focus and a new viewpoint which is called cognitive viewpoint was applied. This viewpoint has emphazised on cognitive processes and emotional motivations in information seeking behaviour In this paper, user's cognitive structure, relevance, information seeking behaviour and the relations among them are examined

Özet

Uzun yıllar bilgi erişim sistemleri, kullanıcı dikkate alınmaksızın, sadece sistem ve sistemden alınan çıktı üzerinde çalışılarak geliştirilmiştir. Ancak, bilgi erişim sistemlerinin işleyişi ve bilginin düzenlenmesi, kullanıcının bilgiyi zihninde işleyişinden farklıdır. 1970'lerin sonu ve 1980'lerin ilk yıllarında, kullanıcının bilişsel ve duygusal niteliğinin, sistemle olan iletişmini ve bilgi arama davranışını etkilediği anlaşılmıştır. Kullanıcının bilgi arama davranışı ve bilgi ihtiyacıyla ilgili araştırmalara yeni bir bakış açısı getiren Bilişsel Yaklaşım, çalışmalarda uygulanmıştır. Bu yaklaşım, kullanıcının zihinsel işlemlerinin ve duygusal güdülerinin bilgi arama davranışını nasıl etkilediği üzerinde odaklanmıştır. Bu makalede, kullanıcının bilişsel yapısı, ilgililik, bilgi arama davranışı ve bu kavramlar arasındaki ilişki incelenecek ve daha iyi bilgi erişim sistemleri geliştirme yönünde önerilerde bulunulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uçak, N. Ö., Güzeldere, Ş. O. (2006). The Impact of Cognitive Structure and Processeson Information Seeking. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 7–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/89519

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Allen,BryceL. (1991).Cognitive research in informationscience:Implicationsfor design.M.E.Williams (Yay. Haz.),Annual review of informationscience andtechnologyiçinde(Cilt 26,ss.1-37). New Jersey:American Society forInformationScience. Ausubel, D.P.(1963).Cognitive structure andthe facilitation of meaningfulverbal learning.Journal of Teacher Education,14, 217-221. Barnett,GeorgeA. ve Siegel G.(1988).Thediffusion ofcomputer assistedlegal research systems. Journal of theAmericanSociety for Information Science,39(4), 224-234.
  2. Barry, CarolL.veSchamberL. (1998).Users' criteria for relevanceevaluation:A cross-situationalcomparison. InformationProcessingandManagement, 34(2/3),219 Bates, M.J. (1989). Thedesignofbrowsing and berrypickingtechniquesfor the onlinesearchinterface. Online Review,13, 407-424. Belkin,N.J.,Oddy R.N.ve BrooksH.M. (1982a). ASK for informationretrieval: PartI. background andtheory. Journalof Documentation, 38(2),61-71. Belkin,N.J.,Oddy R.N.ve BrooksH.M.(1982b). ASKfor informationretrieval: Part II.result of designstudy. Journal of Documentation, 38(3), 145-164. Borgman,Christine L.(1986).The user'smentalmodel of aninformationretrieval system: An experimentona prototype onlinecatalog.International Journalof Man-MachineStudies,24(1),47-64.
  3. Bruce, HarryW.(1994). A cognitiveview of thesituationaldynamismof user­ centered relevanceestimation.Journal of the AmericanSocietyfor InformationScience,45(3), 142-148. Burnkrant,R. E. (1976). A motivationalmodel of information-processing intensity. Journal ofConsumer Research, 3,21-30. Cosijn,E. ve Ingwersen,P.(2000). Dimensions of relevance. Information ProcessingandManagement,36,533-550.
  4. Cuadra, C.A.veKatter,R.V.(1967).Openingthe black boxof relevance. Journal of Documentation, 23(4),291-303.
  5. Das, J.P.,Kirby, J.R. ve Jarman, R.F.(1979).Simultaneousand sequential cognitive processes. NewYork:Academic Press. Davidson,D. Theeffect of individual differences cognitivestyle on judgments of documentrelevance.Journalof the AmericanSocietyfor InformationScience,28,273-184. Dervin,B. (1983). An overview of sensemaking research,concepts,methodsand resultsto date. Seattle,WA: Schoolof Communication,Universityof Washington. Dervin,B. veNilan, M.(1986). Informationneedsanduses.M.E. Williams (Yay. Haz.), Annual Review of InformationScience andTechnology içinde(Cilt 21,ss.3-33). White Plains,NY:Knowledge Industry Publications. Doyle,Lauren B. (1963). Isrelevance anadequatecriterionin retrievalsystem evaluation?HP Luhn (Ya