SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Perspectives in Social Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3

-

Factors Affecting Public Drivers’ Sense of Rule Violations / Sürücülerin Kural İhlalleri Algısını Etkileyen Faktörler

İsmail DEMİRKOL
Hamza TOSUN
Yusuf YÜKSEL
Pages
351–366
Publication Date
2015-03-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result showed that sensation seeking, assertiveness, confidence in driving ability, time pressure, and possibility of being caught affected drivers’ perception of rule violation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research was to examine the predictors of drivers’ sense of rule violations including sensation seeking, aggressiveness, assertiveness, confidence in driving ability, time pressure, and perception of changes of being caught.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three hundred and forty-nine drivers working in various public departments participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result showed that sensation seeking, assertiveness, confidence in driving ability, time pressure, and possibility of being caught affected drivers’ perception of rule violation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tehlikeli araba kullanma · heyecan arayışı · saldırganlık

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the predictors of drivers’ sense of rule violations including sensation seeking, aggressiveness, assertiveness, confidence in driving ability, time pressure, and perception of changes of being caught. Three hundred and forty-nine drivers working in various public departments participated in the study. The dependent variable namely drivers’ perception of rule violations was used to examine factors leading risky driving. The result showed that sensation seeking, assertiveness, confidence in driving ability, time pressure, and possibility of being caught affected drivers’ perception of rule violation

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı sürücülerin kuralları ihlal etmelerine neden olan heyecanarayışı, saldırganlık, sertlik, sürüş yeteneğine güven, zaman baskısı ve yakalanma algısıgibi etkenlerin incelenmesidir. Değişik kamu kurum ve kuruluşlarında çalışan 349 kamusürücüsü çalışmaya katılmıştır. Çalışmada sürücülerin yasaları ihlal algıları sürücülerintehlikeli sürüş davranışlarını anlamak için bağımlı değişken olarak kullanılmıştır.Sonuçlar heyecan arayışı, sertlik, sürüş yeteneğine güven, zaman baskısı ve yakalanmaalgısı gibi nedenlerin sürücülerin kuralları ihlal algısı ile ilgili olduğunu göstermiştir. Keywords: Risky driving, sensation seeking, aggressiveness, time pressure.Anahtar Kelimeler: Tehlikeli araba kullanma, heyecan arayışı, saldırganlık, zamanbaskısı.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKOL, İ., TOSUN, H., YÜKSEL, Y. (2015). -. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 351–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/894394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aberg, L., & Rimmo, P. (1998). “Dimensions of aberrant driver behavior”. Ergonomics, 41(1), 39-56.
  2. Adams-Guppy, J. R., & Guppy, A. (1995). “Speeding in relation to perceptions of risk, utility and driving style by British company car drivers”. Ergonomics, 38(12), 2525-2535.
  3. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  4. Allen, M. E., & McCarthy, P. (2014). Sport psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. Alper, S. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2009). “A systematic review of safety violations in industry”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(4), 739-754.
  5. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). “Human aggression”. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
  6. Arnett, J. J. (1994). “Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale”. Personality and Individual Differences, 16 (2), 289-296.
  7. Arnett, J. J. (1996). “Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior”. Personality and Individual Differences, 20 (6), 693-702.
  8. Arnett, J. J., Offer, D., & Fine, M. A. (1997). “Reckless driving in adolescence: ‘State’ and ‘trait’ factors”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29 (1), 57-63.
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
  10. Bandura, A. (1995). “Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies”. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Baron, R. A. (1977). Human aggression. New York: Plenum Press.
  12. Beilock, R. (1995). “Schedule-induced hours-of-service and speed limit violations among tractor-trailer drivers”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27(1), 33-42.
  13. Berdoulat, E., Vavassori, D., & Sastre, M. T. M. (2013). “Driving anger, emotional and instrumental aggressiveness, and impulsiveness in the prediction of aggressive and transgressive driving”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 758-767.
  14. Berkowitz, L. (1989). “Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation”. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 1, 59-73.
  15. Bushman, B. J., & O’Brien, E. H. (2012). “Aggression”. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encylopedia of human behavior (pp. 37-43).
  16. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. Dahlen, E. R., & White, R. P. (2006). “The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving”. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 903-915.
  17. Dahlen, E.