Journals / Türk Kütüphaneciliği / 2016 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Criteria for Open Access and Publishing

Açık Erişim ve Yayıncılık Değerlendirme Kriterleri

Pages
782–794
Publication Date
2016-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result is a renewed DOAJ that offers a more robust platform, a more stable database and enhanced services to allow the upload and collection of metadata.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article gives an overview of the history and current status of the DOAJ.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After a brief historical overview, DOAJ policies regarding open access, intellectual property rights and questionable publishers are explained in detail.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result is a renewed DOAJ that offers a more robust platform, a more stable database and enhanced services to allow the upload and collection of metadata.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilgi bilim · iletişimağları · veri tabanları

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the history and current status of the DOAJ. After a brief historical overview, DOAJ policies regarding open access, intellectual property rights and questionable publishers are explained in detail. The larger part of this article is a much requested explanation on how DOAJ uses its new set of criteria for the evaluation of open access journals and the rationale behind choosing the seven extra criteria that qualify for the DOAJ Seal. A final section is devoted to the extended possibilities that DOAJ will be offering shortly to scholars and publishers for searching the database and for uploading metadata. The result is a renewed DOAJ that offers a more robust platform, a more stable database and enhanced services to allow the upload and collection of metadata.

Özet

Bu makale DOAJ’ın tarihsel gelişimi ve bugünkü durumuna ilişkin genel bir değerlendirme sunmaktadır. Makalede DOAJ tarihine kısaca değinildikten sonra DOAJ’ın açık erişim, fikri mülkiyet hakları ve kuşku uyandıran yayıncılarla ilgili politikaları detaylı biçimde anlatılmaktadır. Makalenin büyük bir kısmını, DOAJ’ın açık erişim dergi değerlendirme sürecinde yeni belirlenen değerlendirme kriterlerinin nasıl kullanıldığına ilişkin açıklamalar ve DOAJ Seal’ı nitelendirmek için seçilen yedi yeni değerlendirme kriterinin arkasında yatan gerekçeler oluşturmaktadır. Son bölüm, DOAJ’ın yakında akademisyen ve yayıncılara sunacağı veri tabanı arama ve üst veri yükleme ile ilgili genişletilmiş seçeneklere ayrılmıştır. Sonuç, daha güçlü bir platform ve daha istikrarlı bir veri tabanı sunan, yükleme ve üst verinin derlenebilmesi için gelişmiş hizmetlere izin veren yenilenmiş bir DOAJ’dır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALABAN, B., ÇELİK, S., GÜRDAL, G., HOLT, İ. (2016). Criteria for Open Access and Publishing. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 782–794. https://ajindex.com/articles/89408

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adams, C. (2015, 5 Mart). Directory of Open Access Journals introduces new standards to help community address quality concerns. Erişim adresi http://sparcopen.org/news/2015/directory-of- open-access-journals-introduces-new-standards-to-help-community-address-quality-concerns/ BudapestOpen Access Initiative. (2012, 12 Eylül). Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations The Conversation. (2015, 29 Ekim). African academics are being caught in the predatory journal trap. Erişim adresi https://theconversation.com/african-academics-are-being-caught-in-the-predatory- journal-trap-48473 DOAJ news service news, updates & developments from DOAJ. (2015, 19 Mayıs). Copyright and licensing incompatibility - Part 1. Erişim adresi https://doajournals.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/copyright-and-licensing-incompatibility-part-1/ DOAJ news service news, updates & developments from DOAJ. (2015, 2 Haziran). Copyright and licensing - Part 2. Erişim adresi https://doajournals.wordpress.com/2015/06/02/copyright-and- licensing-part-2/ DOAJ. (2015a, Haziran). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Erişim adresi https://doaj.org/bestpractice DOAJ. (2015b). DOAJ API documentation. Erişim adresi. https://doaj.org/api/v1/docs Elsevier Scopus. (2015, 17 Temmuz). Scopus to launch Open Access indicator for journals on July 29. Erişim adresi http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-to-launch-open-access-indicator-for-journals-on- july-29#.VayHUk8V7vc.twitter First Nordic Conference on Scholarly Communication in 2002. (2002). Erişim adresi http://www.lub.lu.se/ncsc2002 The gold OA landspace 2011-2014. (2015 October). Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large, 15(9), 1-73. Erişim adresi http://citesandinsights.info/civ15i9on.pdf
  2. Google Analytics. (2015). Erişim adresi https://www.google.com/analytics/
  3. Inasp. (2015). Journals online. Erişim adresi http://www.inasp.info/en/work/journals-online/ Infrastructure services for open access. (2015). DOAJ finances from 2013 to 2015. Erişim adresi https://is4oa.org/2015/10/23/doaj-finances-from-2013-to-2015/ Infrastructure services for open access. (2016, 22 Mart). IDRC grant to improve OA journals from the Global South. Erişim adresi http://is4oa.org/
  4. Most important benefits of DOAJ. (2013). DOAJ publishers' spring survey 2013. Erişim adresi https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kuU7N8XS-aZUgSu5XaLoamTd7ZE3buu69fJyYYKFtns
  5. ROAD. (2015). Erişim adresi http://road