SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2023 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADOPTION OF MOOC IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Nour Awni ALBELBISI
Ahmad Samed AL-ADWAN
Akhmad HABIBI
Pages
217–231
Publication Date
2023-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed 12 sub-factors influencing the adoption of MOOCs, seven subfactors for the opportunities for using MOOC, namely, improve the higher education system, support lifelong learning, the accessibility, interactivity, flexibility, individualized instructions, and the positive attitude toward using MOOC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to highlight the factors influencing the adoption of MOOCs in the Malaysian context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings revealed 12 sub-factors influencing the adoption of MOOCs, seven subfactors for the opportunities for using MOOC, namely, improve the higher education system, support lifelong learning, the accessibility, interactivity, flexibility, individualized instructions, and the positive attitude toward using MOOC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Such findings are important for improving the implementation of MOOCs in the Malaysian higher education system for MOOC learners and related stakeholders.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Focus group discussion · Higher Education · MOOCs

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to highlight the factors influencing the adoption of MOOCs in the Malaysian context. This qualitative study was designed using focus group discussions (FGs) with fifty postgraduate students from two Malaysian Universities. The thematic analysis revealed two major themes, opportunities, and challenges. The findings revealed 12 sub-factors influencing the adoption of MOOCs, seven subfactors for the opportunities for using MOOC, namely, improve the higher education system, support lifelong learning, the accessibility, interactivity, flexibility, individualized instructions, and the positive attitude toward using MOOC. The challenges included 5 sub-factors, namely, lack of openness feature, lack of knowledge and skills, poor technology infrastructure, low self-regulated learning skills, and lack of instructor’ support. Such findings are important for improving the implementation of MOOCs in the Malaysian higher education system for MOOC learners and related stakeholders.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALBELBISI, N. A., AL-ADWAN, A. S., HABIBI, A. (2023). A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADOPTION OF MOOC IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 217–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/892765

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ab Jalil, H., Ismail, A., Bakar, N., Azizan, N. A., & Nasir, K. (2016). Evaluation of Malaysia Pilot MOOC (Final Report). Serdang, Malaysia: CADe UPM Abdel-Maksoud, N. F. (2019). Factors Affecting MOOCs' Adoption in the Arab World: Exploring Learners' Perceptions on MOOCs' Drivers and Barriers. Higher Education Studies, 12(11), 164-177.
  2. Abeer, W., & B. Miri, B. (2014). Students’ preferences and views about learning in a MOOC. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, pp. 318-323, 2014.
  3. Abu-Shanab, E., & Musleh, S. (2018). The adoption of massive open online courses: Challenges and benefits. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 13(4), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2018100104.
  4. Al-Adwan, A. S. (2020). Investigating the drivers and barriers to MOOCs adoption: The perspective of TAM. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10250-z.
  5. Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Aladwan, S. H., Horani, O., Al-Madadha, A., & Al Khasawneh, M. H. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Social Media Use on Student’s Perception of Academic Performance in Higher Education: Evidence from Jordan. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 953-975.
  6. Al-Rahmi, W., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M., Alyoussef, I., Al-Rahmi, A., & Kamin, Y. (2019). Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: Supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629599.
  7. Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38.
  8. Authors (2018). Mapping the Factors Influencing Success of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) in Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2995-3012.
  9. Authors (2019). Factors influencing Learners' self-regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.598191.
  10. Authors (2020). Systematic review of a Nationwide Mooc initiative in Malaysian higher education system. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(4), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.34190/ EJEL.20.18.4.002 Authors (2021). Impact Of Quality Antecedents on Satisfaction toward MOOC. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22 (2),