SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kütüphaneciliği / 2020 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Cumulative Advantage and “Science Elites”

Birikimli Üstünlük ve “Bilimin Seçkinleri”

Zehra TAŞKIN
Pages
249–254
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main aim of this comment is to list the various factors that make “some” more visible than others in the scientific communities and to warn those who are concerned about such factors in research evaluations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Science is measured by using numbers today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it is possible to see that some factors that significantly affect the number of publications and citations in research performance evaluation processes are not taken into consideration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main aim of this comment is to list the various factors that make “some” more visible than others in the scientific communities and to warn those who are concerned about such factors in research evaluations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Matthew etkisi · Matilda etkisi · bilimde birikimli üstünlük

Abstract

Science is measured by using numbers today. However, it is possible to see that some factors that significantly affect the number of publications and citations in research performance evaluation processes are not taken into consideration. The main aim of this comment is to list the various factors that make “some” more visible than others in the scientific communities and to warn those who are concerned about such factors in research evaluations.

Özet

Günümüzde üretilen bilimsel çıktıların değerlendirilmesi için sıklıkla sayısal değerlendirmeler tercih ediliyor. Ancak araştırma performans değerlendirme süreçlerinde yayın ve atıf sayılarını önemli oranda etkileyen bazı unsurların dikkate alınmadığını görmek mümkün. Bu yazının temel amacı bilimsel camiada “bazılarının” daha görünür olmasını sağlayan çeşitli etkenleri listelemek ve araştırma değerlendirmelerinde bu gibi unsurlara özen gösterilmesi konusunda ilgilileri uyarmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, Z. (2020). Cumulative Advantage and “Science Elites”. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 249–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/89248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bol, T., de Vaan, M. ve van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887-4890. Erişim adresi: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/115/19/4887.full.pdf
  2. Doğan, G. (2017). Akademik performans odaklı uluslararası üniversite sıralama sistemlerinin genel sıralamalarına ve ölçütlerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Doktora tezi]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Erişim adresi: http://www.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11655/3482
  3. Gladwell, M. (2009). Outliers: The story of success (Çizginin dışındakiler) (Aytül Özer, Çev.). İstanbul:
  4. Kapital Medya Hizmetleri A.Ş. Huang, J., Gates, A.J., Sinatra, R. ve Barabási, A-L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201914221. Erişim adresi: https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/02/14/1914221117
  5. King, M.M., Bergstrom, C.T., Correll, S.J., Jacquet, J. ve West, J.D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1-22. Erişim adresi: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2378023117738903
  6. Kuzhabekova, A. (2019). Invisibilizing Eurasia: How north–south dichotomization marginalizes post-soviet scholars in ınternational research collaborations. Journal of Studies in International Education [Basım aşamasında]. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1028315319888887
  7. Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. Doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 Müller, M. (2018). In search of the global east: Thinking between north and South. Geopolitics, 21(7), 998-1014. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2019.1585911 Özet öğretim elemanı sayıları raporu. (2020). https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  8. Rossiter, M.W. (1993). The Matthew Mathilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325-341. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/285482?seq=1
  9. Times Higher Education. (2020). World University Rankings 2020. Erişim adresi: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/100/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats