Journals / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2023 / Sayı: 93

The Relationship Between Secondary Students' Perceptions on The Interactional Behavior of Mathematics Teachers and the Students' Approach to Mathematics Learning

İLKÖĞRETİM MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN ETKİLEŞİM DAVRANIŞLARI İLE ÖĞRENCİLERİN MATEMATİK ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Pages
198–210
Publication Date
2023-03-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been seen that there is a positive relationship between the leader teacher feature and the deep learning approach, a negative relationship between the strict teacher feature and the deep learning approach, a positive relationship between the strict teacher feature and the surface learning approach, and a negative relationship between the strict teacher feature and the strategic learning approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between secondary school students' perceptions of mathematics teachers' teacher interaction behaviours and their mathematics learning approaches The study group of the research, in which the relational scanning model was used, consists of 1013 volunteer students. ‘'Teacher Interaction Scale’’ and ‘'Mathematics Learning Approaches Scale’’ were used to collect data in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The following findings were reached in the study: (1) It is seen that secondary school students adopt strategic, in-depth and surface learning approaches respectively in mathematics lessons. (2) Students perceive their mathematics teachers as helpful/friendly the most, then as understanding and leader, respectively. (3) There is a relationship between teacher interaction behaviours and students' approaches to learning mathematics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been seen that there is a positive relationship between the leader teacher feature and the deep learning approach, a negative relationship between the strict teacher feature and the deep learning approach, a positive relationship between the strict teacher feature and the surface learning approach, and a negative relationship between the strict teacher feature and the strategic learning approach.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğretmen Etkileşim Davranışları · Öğrenme Yaklaşımları · Matematik öğrenme Yaklaşımları

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between secondary school students' perceptions of mathematics teachers' teacher interaction behaviours and their mathematics learning approaches The study group of the research, in which the relational scanning model was used, consists of 1013 volunteer students. ‘'Teacher Interaction Scale’’ and ‘'Mathematics Learning Approaches Scale’’ were used to collect data in the study. While the teacher interaction scale consists of eight sub-dimensions and the mathematics learning approaches scale consists of three consists of sub-dimensions. Descriptive statistics and regression analyzes were used to analyze the data. The following findings were reached in the study: (1) It is seen that secondary school students adopt strategic, in-depth and surface learning approaches respectively in mathematics lessons. (2) Students perceive their mathematics teachers as helpful/friendly the most, then as understanding and leader, respectively. (3) There is a relationship between teacher interaction behaviours and students' approaches to learning mathematics. Strict and leader teacher behaviour characteristics are significant predictors of mathematics learning approaches. It has been seen that there is a positive relationship between the leader teacher feature and the deep learning approach, a negative relationship between the strict teacher feature and the deep learning approach, a positive relationship between the strict teacher feature and the surface learning approach, and a negative relationship between the strict teacher feature and the strategic learning approach.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ilköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin etkileşim davranışları ile öğrencilerin matematik öğrenme yaklaşımları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. İlişkisel tarama modelinin kullanıldığı araştırmanın çalışma grubu 1013 ortaokul öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Çalışma grubunun belirlenmesinde kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verileri sekiz alt boyuttan oluşan ‘‘Öğretmen Etkileşim Ölçeği’’ ve üç alt boyuttan oluşan ‘‘Matematik Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Ölçeği’’ ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde betimsel istatistikler ve regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada şu bulgulara ulaşılmıştır: (1) Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik dersinde sırayla stratejik, derinlemesine ve yüzeysel öğrenme yaklaşımlarını benimsedikleri görülmektedir. (2) Öğrenciler matematik öğretmenlerini en çok yardımsever/arkadaşça, daha sonra sırasıyla anlayışlı ve lider olarak algılamaktadırlar. (3)Öğretmen etkileşim davranışlarıyla öğrencilerin matematik öğrenme yaklaşımları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Öğrencilerin öğretmenlerini katı ve lider bir öğretmen olarak algılamaları onların matematik öğrenmeye yönelik yaklaşımlarını anlamlı olarak yordamaktadır. Lider öğretmen özelliği ile derin öğrenme yaklaşımı arasında pozitif yönlü, katı öğretmen özelliği ile derin öğrenme yaklaşımı arasında negatif yönlü, katı öğretmen özelliği ile yüzeysel öğrenme yaklaşımı arasında pozitif yönlü, katı öğretmen özelliği ile stratejik öğrenme yaklaşımı arasında negatif yönlü zayıf bir ilişkinin olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, G., DENİZ, S. (2023). The Relationship Between Secondary Students' Perceptions on The Interactional Behavior of Mathematics Teachers and the Students' Approach to Mathematics Learning. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Sayı: 93, 198–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/891781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Al Dweet, F. (2019). College level business courses in the UAE: Learning environment, teacher interpersonal behaviour and student adaptive learning engagement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Curtin. Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526
  2. Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes A study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education, 11(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280210153254
  3. Ekinci, N. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(151), 74-88.
  4. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
  5. Entwistle, N. J. (2001). Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes, 30( 5/6), 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110391823
  6. Fisher, D., Henderson, D., & Fraser, B. (1995). Interpersonal behaviour in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356447
  7. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. (3. baskı). Routledge. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6. baskı). Longman. Goh, S.C., & Fraser, B. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning Environments Research,1, 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009910017400
  8. Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Validation of an elementary school version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Psychological Reports, 79(2), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.515
  9. Göktepe-Yıldız, S., & Özdemir, A. Ş. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 17(3), 1378-1401. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466358 Henry,G.T.(1990).
  10. Practical sampling. Sage. Holmes, A. G. (2018). Contemporary students’ approaches to learning: a case study of the relationship between assessment and approaches to learning of education students at two English universities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Sheffield. Kim, H., Fisher, D., & Fraser, B. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher inter