SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of the Factors Hindering the Widespread Use of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques and House of Quality

Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Türkiye’de Yaygın Kullanımını Engelleyen Faktörlerin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ve Kalite Evi ile Analiz Edilmesi

Mehmet Ali ILGIN
Elifnur ALKAN
Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2020-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, alternative solutions which lessen the impact of the factors are presented using house of quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey has a great potential for the production of renewable energy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, a substantial portion of Turkey’s energy needs is fulfilled by using non-renewable energy sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, alternative solutions which lessen the impact of the factors are presented using house of quality.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yenilenebilir Enerji · Çok Kriterli Karar Verme · Kalite Evi

Abstract

Turkey has a great potential for the production of renewable energy. However, a substantial portion of Turkey’s energy needs is fulfilled by using non-renewable energy sources. The factors hindering the widespread use of renewable energy sources in Turkey are analyzed in this study. First, the factors are determined through literature review and a survey. Next, the importance levels of the factors are determined using DEMATEL and Analytical Network Process multi criteria decision making methods. Finally, alternative solutions which lessen the impact of the factors are presented using house of quality.

Özet

Türkiye, yenilenebilir enerji üretimi için yüksek bir potansiyele sahiptir. Buna karşın, Türkiye’nin enerji ihtiyacının önemli bir kısmı yenilenemeyen enerji kaynakları kullanılarak karşılanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının Türkiye’de yaygın kullanımını engelleyen faktörler analiz edilmiştir. İlk olarak, literatür taraması ve anket yoluyla faktörler belirlenmiştir. Daha sonra DEMATEL ve analitik ağ süreci çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile faktörlerin önem düzeyleri belirlenmiştir. Son olarak, Kalite Evi kullanılarak faktörlerin etkilerini azaltacak çözüm önerileri sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ILGIN, M. A., ALKAN, E. (2020). Analysis of the Factors Hindering the Widespread Use of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques and House of Quality. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/889325

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aktaş, R., Doğanay, M.M., Gökmen, Y., Gazibey, Y.,Türen, U. (2015). Sayısal Karar Verme Yöntemleri. İstanbul:
  2. Beta Yayıncılık. Armaroli, N.,Balzani, V. (2007). The Future of Energy Supply: Challenges and Opportunities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46, 52-66.
  3. Beddoe, M.,Chamberlin, A. (2003). Avoiding confrontation: securing planning permission for on-shore wind energy developments in England: comments from a wind energy developer. Planning Practice & Research, 18 (1), 3-17.
  4. Bezir Çiçek, N., Öztürk, M.,Özek, N. (2009). Renewable energy market conditions and barriers in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (6), 1428-36.
  5. Carley, S. (2009). State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy, 37 (8), 3071-81.
  6. Eleftheriadis, I.M.,Anagnostopoulou, E.G. (2015). Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources. Energy Policy, 80, 153-64.
  7. Foxon, T.,Pearson, P. (2008). Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (1, Supplement 1), S148-S61. Fthenakis, V., Mason, J.E.,Zweibel, K. (2009). The technical, geographical, and economic feasibility for solar energy to supply the energy needs of the US. Energy Policy, 37 (2), 387-99.
  8. Fuchs, D.A.,Arentsen, M.J. (2002). Green electricity in the market place: the policy challenge. Energy Policy, 30 (6), 525-38.
  9. Gabus, A.,Fontela, E. 1972. "World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL." In. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Center. Guerin, T.F. (2001). Transferring Environmental Technologies to China: Recent Developments and Constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67 (1), 55-75.
  10. Kaya, D. (2006). Renewable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10 (2), 152-63.
  11. Kumar, A., Kumar, K., Kaushik, N., Sharma, S.,Mishra, S. (2010). Renewable energy in India: Current status and future potentials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (8), 2434-42.
  12. Liu, M.F.M.,Pistorius, T. (2012). Coping with the energy crisis: Impact assessment and potentials of non-traditional renewable energy in rural Kyrgyzstan. Energy Policy, 44, 130-9.
  13. Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Garg, D.,Haleem, A. (2015). Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 762-76.
  14. Mondal, M.A.H., Ka