Journals / Sakarya Tıp Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Development and treatment of CSF fistula, post-operative headache, cerebellar ptosis in 62 patients who underwent posterior fossa cranioplasty or not following posterior fossa surgery

Posterior fossa cerrahisinde kraniyoplasti yapılan ve yapılmayan 62 hastada BOS fistülü, postoperatif baş ağrısı, serebellar pitozis gelişimi ve tedavisi

Pages
141–149
Publication Date
2023-03-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The preliminary study suggests that cranioplasty is useful for headache and cerebellar ectopy however insufficient for prevention of CNF fistula development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The approaches in posterior fossa surgery are used for accessing various tumors and vascular lesions including neuro-glial tumors, vestibular Schwannomas, inclusion tumors, meningiomas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 62 patients who underwent operation due to infra-tentorial intra-cranial mass lesion in Neuro-Surgery Clinic between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The preliminary study suggests that cranioplasty is useful for headache and cerebellar ectopy however insufficient for prevention of CNF fistula development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:posterior fossa · kranioplasti · beyin omurilik sıvısı fistülü

Abstract

Objective: The approaches in posterior fossa surgery are used for accessing various tumors and vascular lesions including neuro-glial tumors, vestibular Schwannomas, inclusion tumors, meningiomas. Materials and Methods: A total of 62 patients who underwent operation due to infra-tentorial intra-cranial mass lesion in Neuro-Surgery Clinic between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study. Result: The study was conducted with 62 patients of whom 61.3% (n=38) were males and 38.72% (n=24) were females between 2014 and 2018. While 33.9% (n=21) of the patients underwent cranioplasty, 66.1% (n=41) did not undergo cranioplasty. Conclusion: The preliminary study suggests that cranioplasty is useful for headache and cerebellar ectopy however insufficient for prevention of CNF fistula development.

Özet

Amaç: Posterior fossa cerrahi yaklaşımları nöro-glial tümörler, vestibüler Schwannomlar, inklüzyon tümörleri, meningiomlar gibi çeşitli tümörlere ve vasküler lezyonlara ulaşmak için kullanılmaktadır Yöntem ve Gereçler: 2014-2018 yılları arasında Nöroşirürji Kliniği'nde infratentoryal intrakranial kitle lezyonu nedeniyle opere edilen toplam 62 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bulgular: Çalışma 2014-2018 yılları arasında %61,3 (n=38) erkek ve %38,72 (n=24) kadın olmak üzere 62 hasta ile gerçekleştirildi. Hastaların %33,9'una (n=21) kraniyoplasti yapılırken, 66,1 % (n=41) kranyoplasti geçirmedi. Sonuç: Bizim bu çalışmamız, kranioplastinin baş ağrısı ve serebellar ektopi için yararlı olduğunu ancak BOS fistül gelişimini önlemede yetersiz olduğunu düşündürmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

YALDIZ, C., TÜRK, O., TAHMAZOĞLU, B., ŞAHİN, Ö. F., BARAN, Ö., KARAOĞLU, A. C., AMBARCIOĞLU, M. A., KAYA, M., CEYLAN, D. (2023). Development and treatment of CSF fistula, post-operative headache, cerebellar ptosis in 62 patients who underwent posterior fossa cranioplasty or not following posterior fossa surgery. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 141–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/888405

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Aslantürk Y, Yılmaz N, Ökten AI, Akbay FY, Basmacı M, Taşkın Y. Posterior Fossa Tümörlerinde Cerrahi Tedavi Sonuçları. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2006; 13 (1):4-8.
  2. Ling PY, Zachary S, Rohit K, Jyung RW, Liu JK. Reconstruction after retrosigmoid approaches using autologous fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty: assessmentof postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks and headachesin 60 cases. Acta Neurochir. 2014; 156:1879–1888. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2190-x 3. Castaño-Leon AM, Cepeda S, Paredes I. Symptomatic ptosis cerebelli after suboccipital craniectomy in a patient with severe brain trauma. Brain injury. 2017;31(10):1294-1297. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1309571 4. Holly LT, Batzdorf U. Management of cerebellar ptosis following craniovertebral decompression for Chiari I malformation. J Neurosurg. 2001; 94:21–6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.1.0021 5. Heller JB, Lazareff J, Gabbay JS, Lam S, Kawamoto HK, Bradley JP. Posterior cranial fossa box expansion leads to resolution of symptomatic cerebellar ptosis following Chiari I malformation repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18:274–80. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31802c05ab 6. Udani V, Holly LT, Chow D, Batzdorf. Posterior fossa recon- struction using titanium plate for the treatment of cerebellar ptosis after decompression for Chiari malformation. World Neurosurg. 2014; 81:836–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.081 7. Catalano PJ, Jacobowitz O, Post KD. Prevention of headache after retrosigmoid removal of acoustic tumors. Am J Otol. 1996; 17:904–908.
  3. Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V. Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J Cranio fac Surg. 2003; 14:144–153. DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200303000-00003 9. Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ. Cranioplasty. Review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011; 2:162–167. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.83584 10. Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ. Retrosigmoidap- proach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012; 45:375–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001 11. Charalampakis S, Koutsimpelas D, Gouveris H, Mann W. Post-operative complications after removal of sporadic vestibular schwannoma via retrosigmoid-suboccipital approach: current diagnosis and management. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L. 2011, 268:653–660. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1480-z 12. Wazen JJ, Sisti M, Lam S