Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2023 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Regulations on Private School Choice Program Participation: Experimental Evidence from the United States

Pages
142–186
Publication Date
2023-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some regulations are more likely to deter private schools with higher reported tuitions, higher enrollment trends, more specialization, and more climate problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Private school leaders weigh costs and benefits when deciding whether to participate in school voucher programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Relative to no regulations, we find that open-enrollment mandates reduce the likelihood that private school leaders report being certain to participate in a hypothetical choice program by about 14 percentage points, or 67%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some regulations are more likely to deter private schools with higher reported tuitions, higher enrollment trends, more specialization, and more climate problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:private school · school choice · regulation

Abstract

Private school leaders weigh costs and benefits when deciding whether to participate in school voucher programs. Regulatory costs associated with accepting voucher funding could reduce private school leaders’ willingness to participate. We test this hypothesis through the first random assignment analysis of the effects of various regulations on the expressed willingness of private school leaders to participate in hypothetical voucher programs that draws upon national data. We randomly assign different regulations to U.S. private school leaders and ask them whether they would participate in a hypothetical school voucher program during the following school year. Relative to no regulations, we find that open-enrollment mandates reduce the likelihood that private school leaders report being certain to participate in a hypothetical choice program by about 14 percentage points, or 67%. The requirement that private schools accept the voucher funding amount as payment-in-full reduces the likelihood that private school leaders report being certain to participate by 16 percentage points, or 77%. Some regulations are more likely to deter private schools with higher reported tuitions, higher enrollment trends, more specialization, and more climate problems.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEANGELİS, C., BURKE, L., WOLF, P., DİLLS, A. (2023). The Effects of Regulations on Private School Choice Program Participation: Experimental Evidence from the United States. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 142–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/888350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2018). Free to choose: can school choice reduce student achievement? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 175-206. American Federation of Teachers (n.d.). Private school vouchers don’t help kids. https://www.aft.org/private-school-vouchers-dont-help-kids
  2. Austin, M. J. (2015). Schools’ responses to voucher policy: Participation decisions and early implementation experiences in the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program. Journal of School Choice, 9(3), 354-379.
  3. Austin, M. (2019). Organizational and social costs of schools' participation in a voucher program. In M. Berends, R. J. Waddington, & J. Schoenig (Eds.), School choice at the crossroads research perspectives (pp. 30-51).
  4. New York City, NY: Routledge. Barnum, M. 2017. To Test or Not to Test: As Tax Credit Scholarships Expand, Questions About Accountability and Outcomes. The 74 Million. https://www.the74million.org/article/to-test-or-not-to-test-as-tax-credit-scholarships-expand-questions-about-accountability-and-outcomes/
  5. Bedrick, J. (2016). The folly of overregulating school choice. Education Next. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/the-folly-of-overregulating-school-choice/
  6. Bettinger, E., Kremer, M., Kugler, M., Medina, C., Posso, C., & Saavedra, J. E. (2019).
  7. School Vouchers, Labor Markets and Vocational Education. Borradores de Economía. Retrieved from http://banrep.gov.co/en/school-vouchers-labor-markets-and-vocational-education
  8. Burke, L. M. (2016). Avoiding the “inexorable push toward homogenization” in school choice: Education savings accounts as hedges against institutional isomorphism. The Journal of School Choice, 10(4), 560-578.
  9. Cheng, A., Henderson, M., Peterson, P.E., and M.R. West (2019). Public Support Climbs for Teacher Pay, School Expenditures, Charter Schools, and Universal Vouchers: Results from the 2018
  10. EdNext Poll. Education Next, Winter, 8-26.
  11. DeAngelis, C. A. (2020). Regulatory compliance costs and private school participation in voucher programs. Journal of School Choice, 14(1), 95-121.
  12. DeAngelis, C. A., & Burke, L. M. (2017). Does regulation induce homogenisation? An analysis of three voucher programmes in the United States. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(7-8), 311-327.
  13. DeAngelis, C. A., & Burke, L. M. (2019). Does regulation reduce specialization? Examining the impact of regulations on private schools of choice in five locations. EdChoice Working Paper No. 2019-1. Retrieved from https://www.edc