Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of Interventional Studies on COVID-19 in Turkey: A Systematic Review

COVID-19 ile ilgili Türkiye’deki Girişimsel Çalışmaların İncelenmesi: Sistematik Bir Derleme

Pages
24–41
Publication Date
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, there is a need for more comprehensive studies on the diagnosis, treatment, symptoms, effects, and management of COVID-19, including children and older people at risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aims to systematically review the interventional studies from Turkey published in national and international databases for the treatment and management of COVID-19.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The studies conducted between January-2020 and August-2021 were searched through PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, EBSCHO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Turkey Citation Index, ULAKBİM, and COVID-19 Turkey Web Portal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, there is a need for more comprehensive studies on the diagnosis, treatment, symptoms, effects, and management of COVID-19, including children and older people at risk.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · farmakolojik tedavi · non-farmakolojik tedavi

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to systematically review the interventional studies from Turkey published in national and international databases for the treatment and management of COVID-19. Material and Methods: The studies conducted between January-2020 and August-2021 were searched through PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, EBSCHO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Turkey Citation Index, ULAKBİM, and COVID-19 Turkey Web Portal. Fourteen studies meeting the criteria were included. Results: The studies were conducted with randomized controlled (n=6), clinical trial (n=1), interventional double-controlled trial (n=1), and quasi-experimental study design (n=5). One is a randomized, prospective crossover, model simulation study. The evaluated studies include non-pharmacological (n=8) and pharmacological (n=6) approaches. Tele-rehabilitation or online methods were used in all non-pharmacological studies. Six studies aimed at reducing the stress, depression, and anxiety levels of individuals. Pharmacological studies were (n=6) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment modalities. The result shows that interventions in non-pharmacological studies are highly effective, and treatment methods applied in pharmacological studies also have a positive effect. Conclusion: This review will contribute to the literature by shedding light on future research. Moreover, there is a need for more comprehensive studies on the diagnosis, treatment, symptoms, effects, and management of COVID-19, including children and older people at risk.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, COVID-19'un tedavisi ve yönetimi için yürütülmüş ulusal ve uluslararası veri tabanlarında yayınlanmış Türkiye adresli girişimsel araştırmaların sistematik olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2020-Ağustos 2021 tarihlerinde yapılan araştırmalar; PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, EBSCHO, Web of Science, Google Akademik/Scholar, Türkiye Atıf Dizini, ULAKBİM ve COVID-19 Türkiye Web Portalını içeren veri tabanları üzerinden taranmıştır. Kriterleri karşılayan on dört çalışma dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmalar randomize kontrollü (n=6), klinik çalışma (n=1), girişimsel çift kontrollü çalışma (n=1) ve yarı deneysel çalışma tasarımı (n=5) ile yürütülmüştür. Bir çalışma randomize, prospektif çapraz, manken simülasyon çalışmasıdır. Araştırmaların sekizi non-farmakolojik, altısı ise farmakolojik içerikli araştırmalardır. Non-farmakolojik çalışmaların içeriklerinin tümünde tele-rehabilitasyon veya online yöntemlerin kullanıldığı görülmüştür. Altı çalışmada bireylerin stres, depresyon ve anksiyete düzeyini azaltmaya yönelik girişimler uygulanmıştır. Farmakolojik çalışmaların içeriklerinin ise (n=6) farklı tedavi yöntemlerinin etkinliğini değerlendirmeye yönelik olduğu belirlenmiştir. Non-farmakolojik çalışmalarda uygulanan girişimlerin büyük oranda etkili olduğu, farmakolojik çalışmalarda uygulanan tedavi yöntemlerinin ise olumlu etkiye sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Sonuç: Bu derleme çalışmasının ileride yapılacak araştırmalara ışık tutması açısından literatüre önemli bir katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca, çocuklar ve risk altındaki yaşlı bireyler de dahil olmak üzere COVID-19’un tanı, tedavi, semptom, etki ve yönetimi gibi konularda daha geniş kapsamlı çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, E., DÖNMEZ, A. A., ÇINAR, F. İ. (2023). Investigation of Interventional Studies on COVID-19 in Turkey: A Systematic Review. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 24–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/886319

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Chowdhury R, Luhar S, Khan N, Choudhury SR, Matin I, Franco OH. Long-term strategies to control COVID-19 in low and middle-income countries: An options overview of community-based, non-pharmacological interventions. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2020;35(8):743-8.
  2. Mitchell EJ, Ahmed K, Breeman S, Cotton S, Constable L, Ferry G, et al. It is unprecedented: Trial management during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Trials. 2020;21(1):1-7. World Health Organisation (WHO) Coronavirus (COVID-19). [Internet]. 2021 [Erişim tarihi 27 Aralık 2021]. Erişim adresi: https://covid19.who.int/.
  3. Stub T, Jong MC, Kristoffersen AE. The impact of COVID-19 on complementary and alternative medicine providers: A cross-sectional survey in Norway. Adv Integr Med. 2021;8(4):247-55.
  4. Qi Y, Shaman J, Pei S. Quantifying the impact of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions on influenza transmission in the United States. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;224(9):1500-8.
  5. Tarighi P, Eftekhari S, Chizari M, Sabernavaei M, Jafari D, Mirzabeigi P. A review of potential suggested drugs for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) treatment. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;895:173890. Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ, Cutrell JB. Pharmacologic treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A review. Jama. 2020;323(18):1824-36.
  6. Panyod S, Ho CT, Sheen LY. Dietary therapy and herbal medicine for COVID-19 prevention: A review and perspective. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2020;10(4):420-7.
  7. Boozari M, Hosseinzadeh H. Natural products for COVID‐19 prevention and treatment regarding to previous coronavirus infections and novel studies. Phytother Res. 2021;35(2):864-76.
  8. Hertzog RG, Bicheru NS, Popescu DM, Călborean O, Catrina AM. Hypoxic preconditioning-a nonpharmacological approach in COVID-19 prevention. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;103:415-9.
  9. Dehghan M, Ghanbari A, Heidari FG, Shahrbabaki PM, Zakeri MA. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in general population during COVID-19 outbreak: A survey in Iran. J. Integr. Med. 2021;20(1):45-51.
  10. Kretchy IA, Boadu JA, Kretchy JP, Agyabeng K, Passah AA, Koduah A, et al. Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine for the prevention of COVID-19 infection in Ghana: a national cross-sectional online survey. Prev. Med. Rep. 2021;24:101633. Karataş Y, Khan Z, Bilen Ç, Boz A, Özagil ES, Abussuutoğlu AB, Rahman H. Traditional and complementary medicine use and beliefs during COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional survey among the general population in Turkey. Adv Integr Med. 2021;8(4):261-