Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Refugee Entrepreneurs with Similarities and Differences: A Typology Proposal

Benzerlikleri ve Farklılıklarıyla Göçmen Girişimciler ve Mülteci Girişimciler: Bir Tipoloji Önerisi

Pages
1–31
Publication Date
2022-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study will constitute a legitimate basis for the theory, practice and policies to be developed in terms of the entrepreneurial characteristics, conditions, interactions and legal status of the people who immigrated from their homeland.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Migration, caused by war, disaster, political and economic conditions, can turn into commercial entrepreneurship due to the necessity situation or taking advantage of opportunities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to try to define the entrepreneurship of people who migrated from their homeland, by the definition of immigration of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, by considering the similarities and differences in terms of physical, institutional and social capital, by determining the reasons for migration and starting a business, and to create a typology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study will constitute a legitimate basis for the theory, practice and policies to be developed in terms of the entrepreneurial characteristics, conditions, interactions and legal status of the people who immigrated from their homeland.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Göçmen Girişimciliği · Mülteci Girişimciliği · İtme-Çekme Girişimcilik Modeli

Abstract

Migration, caused by war, disaster, political and economic conditions, can turn into commercial entrepreneurship due to the necessity situation or taking advantage of opportunities. The contribution of the interaction with immigration to economic development and institutional incentives are important in creating an entrepreneurship ecosystem. It is seen that there are problems with identification in academic studies, incentive programs and legal legislation on the entrepreneurship of those who have left their homeland. Concepts such as immigrant, refugee, ethnic, diaspora entrepreneurship are used intertwined in academic literature. The aim of this study is to try to define the entrepreneurship of people who migrated from their homeland, by the definition of immigration of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, by considering the similarities and differences in terms of physical, institutional and social capital, by determining the reasons for migration and starting a business, and to create a typology. In order to contribute to the theory and policies to be developed, a nomological and discretization-based approach to the classification of entrepreneurship of immigrants has been adopted. This study will constitute a legitimate basis for the theory, practice and policies to be developed in terms of the entrepreneurial characteristics, conditions, interactions and legal status of the people who immigrated from their homeland.

Özet

Savaş, afet, siyasi ve ekonomik koşulların neden olduğu göçmenlik, zorunluluk durumu veya fırsatların değerlendirilmesiyle ticari girişimciliğe dönüşebilmektedir. Göçmenlikle oluşan etkileşimin ekonomik kalkınmaya olan katkısı ve girişimcilik ekosistemi oluşturulmasında kurumsal teşvikler önemlidir. Anavatanından ayrılanların girişimciliklerine ilişkin yapılan akademik çalışmalarda, teşvik programlarında ve hukuki mevzuatta tanımlamayla ilgili sorunların olduğu görülmektedir. Göçmen, mülteci, etnik, diaspora girişimciliği gibi kavramlar akademik yazında birbirine geçmiş şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı anavatanından göçen insanların girişimciliğini Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteci Yüksek Komiserliğinin göçmenlik tanımı kapsamında fiziksel, kurumsal ve sosyal sermaye açısından benzerliklerini ve farklılıklarını göç etme ve iş kurma nedenleri çerçevesinde tanımlamaya çalışmak ve bir tipoloji oluşturmaktır. Geliştirilecek teori ve politikalara yardımcı olmak için göçen insanların girişimciliğinin sınıflandırılmasına yönelik nomolojik ve ayrıştırmaya dayalı bir yaklaşım benimsenmiştir. Bu çalışma, anavatanından göç eden kişilerin girişimcilik özellikleri, koşulları, etkileşimleri, hukuki durumları açısından geliştirilecek teori, uygulama ve politikalara meşru bir zemin teşkil edecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, Ö., REYHANOGLU, M. (2022). Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Refugee Entrepreneurs with Similarities and Differences: A Typology Proposal. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 1–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/885493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acs, Z. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth. Innovations, 1(1), 97-107.
  2. Adriana, G. (2016). Educational barriers for disadvantaged groups in entrepreneurship. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 791-799.
  3. Aldrich, H.E., ve Zimmer. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton and R. Smulor (ed.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23), Newyork: Ballinger. Aldrich, H.E. (1999). Organisations evolving. International Edition:
  4. Sage Publications. Alvarez, S., ve Busenitz, L. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource based theory. Journal of Management, 27, 755-775.
  5. Asoba, S.N., ve Mefi, N.P. (2020). Theories of immigrant entrepreneurship in the South African context. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 26(3), 1-13.
  6. Baltacı, A. (2017). A comparison of Syrian migrant students in Turkey and Germany: entrepreneurial tendencies and career expectations. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 15-27.
  7. Baranik, L.E., Hurst, C.S., ve Eby, L.T.(2018). The stigma of being a refugee: A mixed-method study of refugees’ experiences of vocational stress. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 105, 116-130.
  8. Basu, A., ve Altinay, E. (2002). The interaction between culture and entrepreneurship in London's immigrant businesses. International Small Business Journal, 20(4), 371-393.
  9. Becker, G.S. (1975). Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Bernard, W.S. (1976). Immigrants and refugees: Their similarities, differences, and needs. International Migration, 14(4), 267-280.
  11. Betts, A., Bloom, L., Kaplan, J.D., ve Omata, N. (2014). Refugee economies: Rethinking popular assumptions. Oxford: University of Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre. https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/refugee-economies-2014.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30 Mayıs 2022)
  12. Bizri, R.M. (2017). Refugee-entrepreneurship: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(9-10), 847-868.
  13. Bonacich, E. (1973). A theory of middleman minorities. American Sociological Review, 38(5), 583–594.
  14. Brockhaus, R.H. (1980), Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509-520.
  15. Büyükhan, M. (2021). Uluslararası ve ulusal mevzuata göre Türkiye’deki Suriyelilerin hukuki statüsü. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 4(2), 76-90. doi: 10.33723/rs.851412 Chaganti, R., ve Greene, P.G. (2002). Who are ethnic entrepreneurs? A study of entrepreneurs’ ethnic ınvolvement and business characteristics. Journal of Small Business Management, 20(