SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Deep Transfer Learning to Classify Mass and Calcification Pathologies from Screen Film Mammograms

Volkan Müjdat TİRYAKİ
Pages
57–65
Publication Date
2023-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are promising for the implementation of automated diagnosis of breast cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The number of breast cancer diagnosis is the biggest among all cancers, but it can be treated if diagnosed early.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 3,360 patches were used from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) and CBIS-DDSM mammogram databases for convolutional neural network training and testing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are promising for the implementation of automated diagnosis of breast cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Breast cancer · image classification · nodule

Abstract

The number of breast cancer diagnosis is the biggest among all cancers, but it can be treated if diagnosed early. Mammography is commonly used for detecting abnormalities and diagnosing the breast cancer. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis are still being performed by radiologists. In the last decade, deep learning was successfully applied on big image classification databases such as ImageNet. Deep learning methods for the automated breast cancer diagnosis is under investigation. In this study, breast cancer mass and calcification pathologies are classified by using deep transfer learning methods. A total of 3,360 patches were used from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) and CBIS-DDSM mammogram databases for convolutional neural network training and testing. Transfer learning was applied using Resnet50, Xception, NASNet, and EfficientNet-B7 network backbones. The best classification performance was achieved by the Xception network. On the original CBIS-DDSM test data, an AUC of 0.9317 was obtained for the five-way classification problem. The results are promising for the implementation of automated diagnosis of breast cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİRYAKİ, V. M. (2023). Deep Transfer Learning to Classify Mass and Calcification Pathologies from Screen Film Mammograms. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 57–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/885290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. H. L. Bleich, “The computer as a consultant,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 284, no. 3, pp. 141–7, 1971
  2. M. E. Cohen and D. Le Hudson, “A hybrid system for diagnosis involving biosignals,” Proc. 2005 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Meas. Syst. Appl. CIMSA 2005, vol. 2005, no. July, pp. 312–315, 2005
  3. I. Gökbay, S. Karaman, S. Yarman, and B. Yarman, “An intelligent decision support tool for early diagnosis of functional pituitary adenomas,” TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 169, 2015
  4. P. Xi, C. Shu, and R. Goubran, “Abnormality Detection in Mammography using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, Proceedings, 2018, pp. 1–6
  5. J. Tang, R. M. Rangayyan, J. Xu, I. E. El Naqa, and Y. Yang, “Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: Recent advances,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 236–251, 2009
  6. V. Ozmen, “Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients),” J. Breast Heal., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2014
  7. L. Ackerman and E. Gose, “Breast lesion classification by computer and xeroradiograph,” Cancer, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1025–1035, 1972
  8. Y. Kaya, “A new intelligent classifier for breast cancer diagnosis based on a rough set and extreme learning machine: Rs + elm,” Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 21, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 2079–2091, 2013
  9. P. Görgel, A. Sertbas, and O. N. Uçan, “Computer-aided classification of breast masses in mammogram images based on spherical wavelet transform and support vector machines,” Expert Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 155–164, 2015
  10. A. Jain and D. Levy, “Breast Mass Classification from Mammograms using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1612.00542, 2016
  11. N. Wu et al., “Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists’ Performance in Breast Cancer Screening,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1184–1194, 2020
  12. L. Shen, L. R. Margoiles, J. H. Rothstein, E. Fluder, R. McBride, and W. Sieh, “Deep Learning to improve Breast cancer Detection on Screening Mammography,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 12495, pp. 1–12, 2019
  13. B. Zoph, V. Vasudevan, J. Shlens, and Q. V. Le, “Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 8697–8710, 2018
  14. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, R. Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-F