Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2023 / Sayı: 46

Hybrid Approach to Supply Chain Project Manager Selection Problem

Tedarik Zinciri Proje Yöneticisi Seçim Probleminde Hibrit Yaklaşım

Pages
98–108
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, suggestions have been developed for manufacturing companies, supply chain project manager candidates and researchers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supply chain management covers the management of all processes, from determining the material needs of manufacturing companies to delivering value-added products to customers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theoretical approaches and practical applications for supply chain management processes are presented in the literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, suggestions have been developed for manufacturing companies, supply chain project manager candidates and researchers.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Proje Yöneticisi Seçim Problemi · İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi · Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi

Abstract

Supply chain management covers the management of all processes, from determining the material needs of manufacturing companies to delivering value-added products to customers. Theoretical approaches and practical applications for supply chain management processes are presented in the literature. However, there is no project-based supply chain manager selection for the improvement of supply chain processes yet. In this research, the supply chain project manager selection problem is discussed. In this context, multi criteria decision making techniques used for project manager selection problem applications were used. According to the literature review and interviews with the manufacturing executive jury, seven criteria were determined. The criterion weights were determined by the fuzzy the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (F-SWARA) method. The grey operational competitiveness rating method (OCRA-G) method was applied to select the most suitable candidate among the four candidates. According to the research findings, the experience criterion was determined as the most important criterion in the selection of the supply chain project manager. The second candidate was found to be the most suitable candidate. In this research, an alternative hybrid model method for the project selection problem has been presented to the literature by using fuzzy and gray based approaches in a hybrid way. In addition, suggestions have been developed for manufacturing companies, supply chain project manager candidates and researchers.

Özet

Tedarik zinciri yönetimi imalat firmalarının malzeme ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesinden değer katılarak dönüştürülen ürünlerin müşterilere ulaştırılmasına kadar tüm süreçlerin yönetimini kapsamaktadır. Literatürde tedarik zinciri yönetim süreçlerine yönelik teorik yaklaşımlar ve pratik uygulamalar sunulmaktadır. Fakat tedarik zinciri süreçlerinin iyileştirilmesine yönelik proje tabanlı tedarik zinciri proje yönetici seçimine rastlanmamaktadır. Bu araştırmada tedarik zinciri proje yöneticisi seçim problemi ele alınmıştır. Bu kapsamda proje yöneticisi seçim problemi uygulamalarına yönelik kullanılan çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinden faydalanılmıştır. Literatür incelemesi ve imalat firması yönetici jürisi ile yapılan görüşmelere göre yedi kriter belirlenmiştir. Kriter ağırlıkları F-SWARA yöntemiyle belirlenmiştir. Dört aday arasından en uygun adayın seçimi için OCRA-G yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre tedarik zinciri proje yöneticisi seçiminde tecrübe kriteri en önemli kriter olarak belirlenmiştir. İkinci aday en uygun aday olarak bulunmuştur. Bu araştırmada bulanık ve grey tabanlı yaklaşımlar hibrit şekilde kullanılarak literatüre proje seçim problemi için alternatif hibrit model yöntemi sunulmuştur. Ayrıca imalat firmalarına, tedarik zinciri proje yönetici adaylarına, araştırmacılara öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, K., EDİNSEL, S., YALÇIN, G. C. (2023). Hybrid Approach to Supply Chain Project Manager Selection Problem. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 46, 98–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/884969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Afshari, A. R., Anisseh, M., Shahraki, M. R., & Hooshyar, S. (2016). PROMETHEE use in Personnel selection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT Management for Global Competitiveness and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies-ICTM. http://ieomsociety.org/ieom2017/papers/56.pdf
  2. Afshari, A., & Kowal, J. (2017). Decision making methods for the selection of ICT project manager. Gospodarka Rynek Edukacja= Economy Market Education, 18(4), 19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3118075
  3. Afshari, A. R., & Yusuff, R. M. (2013). Fuzzy integral project manager selection. Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering, 9(2), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.7158/14488388.2013.11464855
  4. Ahsan, K., Ho, M., & Khan, S. (2013). Recruiting project managers: A comparative analysis of competencies and recruitment signals from job advertisements. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21366
  5. Alimardani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Aghdaie, M. H., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2013). A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment. Technological and economic development of economy, 19(3), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.814606
  6. Ansari, Z. N., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2020). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: a hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1758973
  7. Chaghooshi, A., Arab, A., & Dehshiri, S. (2016). A fuzzy hybrid approach for project manager selection. Decision Science Letters, 5(3), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.1.001
  8. Chen, L. S., & Cheng, C. H. (2005). Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method. European journal of operational research, 160(3), 803-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.07.003
  9. Çelikbilek, Y. (2018). A grey analytic hierarchy process approach to project manager selection. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(3), 749-765. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2017-0102
  10. Dağdeviren, M. (2010). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing, 21(4), 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0200-7
  11. Dodangeh, J., Sorooshian, S., & Afshari, A. R. (2014). Linguistic extension for group multicriteria project manager selection. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014. htt