Journals / Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 21

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM: A METAANALYSIS STUDY IN NATIONAL LITERATURE

ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME VE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZM ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: ULUSAL YAZINDA BİR META-ANALİZ ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
137–172
Publication Date
2020-04-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it was seen that the effect size, which indicates the level of the relationship between organizational identification and organizational cynicism, was at medium level (ES =-0,301, p <0.005).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the total effect size of individual studies, which have examined the relationship between organizational identification and organizational cynicism in the national literature, with the help of meta-analysis method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the data obtained from 13 individual studies (n = 3341) were tested with random effects model in Comprehensive Meta Analysis (CMA) software program by scanning individual studies with determined keywords.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it was seen that the effect size, which indicates the level of the relationship between organizational identification and organizational cynicism, was at medium level (ES =-0,301, p <0.005).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:örgütsel özdeşleşme · örgütsel sinizm · meta-analizi

Abstract

This study aims to determine the total effect size of individual studies, which have examined the relationship between organizational identification and organizational cynicism in the national literature, with the help of meta-analysis method. For this purpose, the data obtained from 13 individual studies (n = 3341) were tested with random effects model in Comprehensive Meta Analysis (CMA) software program by scanning individual studies with determined keywords. According to the results, it was seen that the effect size, which indicates the level of the relationship between organizational identification and organizational cynicism, was at medium level (ES =-0,301, p <0.005). Effect sizes of individual studies at 95% confidence interval are between the lower and upper limit ranges (-0,474) and (-0,107). Moderator analyses were also conducted to test whether there were differences according to the type of publication, year of publication, organizational identification scales, organizational cynicism scales and the sector in which the individual studies were conducted. In the national literature, the relationship between organizational identification and organizational cynicism has been presented comprehensively.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişkiyi ulusal yazında incelemiş olan bireysel çalışmaların toplam etki büyüklüğünü meta-analize yöntemi yardımıyla tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla, belirlenen anahtar kelimelerle bireysel çalışmalar taranarak 13 bireysel çalışmadan elde edilen veriler (n=3341) Comprehensive Meta Analysis (CMA) yazılım programında rastgele etki modeliyle test edilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişki düzeyini gösteren etki büyüklüğünün orta düzeyde (EB=-0,301, p<0,005) olduğu görülmüştür. Bireysel çalışmaların %95 güven aralığındaki etki büyüklükleri, alt ve üst limit aralıkları (-0,474) ile (-0,107) arasındadır. Yayın türü, yayın yılı, örgütsel özdeşleşme ölçekleri, örgütsel sinizm ölçekleri ve bireysel çalışmaların yapıldığı sektöre göre farklılık olup olmadığını test etmek amacıyla moderatör analizleri de yapılmıştır. Ulusal yazında örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişki kapsamlı olarak sunulmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜRÜ, S. A. (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM: A METAANALYSIS STUDY IN NATIONAL LITERATURE. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 21, 137–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/881781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ABRAHAM, Rebecca (2000). Organizational Cynicism: Bases And Consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 3(126), 269-292.
  2. AKÇAY, Vildan Hilal (2018). Örgütlerde prososyal davranışlar, sinizm ve psikolojik sermaye ilişkisi: Örgütle özdeşleşmenin moderatör etkisi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 381-393.
  3. ALAGÖZ, Musa (2019). Dönüştürücü Liderlik Anlayışı ile Örgütsel Sinizm ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisi: Bir Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, Kars. ARGON, Türkan ve EKİNCİ, Serkan (2016). İlk ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sinizm düzeylerine ilişkin görüşleri. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 1-19.
  4. AYIK, Ahmet, ŞAYİR, Gönül ve BİLİCİ, Ayşe (2016). Investigation of the predictor effect of organizational cynicism on organizational identification according to teachers' perceptions. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(2), 233-254, http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2016.013.
  5. BEDEIAN, Arthur, G. (2007). Even if the Tower Is “Ivory,” It Isn’t “White:” Understanding the Consequences of Faculty Cynicism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 9-32.
  6. BEGG, Colin B. ve MAZUMDAR, Madhuchhanda (1994). Operating Characteristics of A Rank Correlation Test For Publication Bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088-1101.
  7. BELDEK, Emine Gülsün (2015). Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Örgütsel Sinizm ve Örgütsel Muhalefet İlişkisi: Görgül Bir Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Türk Hava Kurumu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, İşletme Programı, Ankara.
  8. BERNERTH, Jeremy, B., ARMENAKIS, Achilles, A., FEILD, Hubert, S. ve WALKER, H. Jack (2007).
  9. Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment a Study af Important Organizational Change Variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326.
  10. BORA, Tanıl. (2011).
  11. Sol, Sinizm, Pragmatizm. İstanbul:
  12. Birikim. BRANDES, Pamela, M. (1997), Organizational Cynicism: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati. BRANDES, Pamela, DHARWADKAR, Ravi ve DEAN, James W. Jr. (1999) “Does Organizational Cynicism Matter? Employee and Supervisor Perspectives on Work Outcomes”, 36th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, Philadelphia PA., 1-34.
  13. CARD, Noel A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: The Guilfo