Journals / İstanbul İktisat Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 72 - Sayı: 2

Quality of Life Index: Istanbul 2020

Yaşam Kalitesi Endeksi: İstanbul 2020

Pages
543–568
Publication Date
2023-01-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the clustering study, when evaluated in terms of 5 clusters, it is observed that 4.8 percent of the population of Istanbul lives in the first level, which is the highest quality of life, while 15.9% are second, 31.5% are third, 36.2% are fourth, and 11.6% are in districts with a fifth level of quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper is based on a quality of life index study comparing 39 districts in Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study is the third of a series of studies, where the first study was conducted and published in 2011 and the second in 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the clustering study, when evaluated in terms of 5 clusters, it is observed that 4.8 percent of the population of Istanbul lives in the first level, which is the highest quality of life, while 15.9% are second, 31.5% are third, 36.2% are fourth, and 11.6% are in districts with a fifth level of quality of life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yaşam Kalitesi · Yaşam Kalitesi Endeksi · Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Endeks

Abstract

This paper is based on a quality of life index study comparing 39 districts in Istanbul. The study is the third of a series of studies, where the first study was conducted and published in 2011 and the second in 2016. The results of the periodic research reveal the transformation of districts in Istanbul in terms of quality of life. The study, carried out on the same methods and parameters, aims to monitor the quality of life at the district level in Istanbul over the years. The weighted average method was used in the analysis made with the district-level 2020 data in Istanbul. According to the index results, Kadıköy, Beşiktaş, Bakırköy, Üsküdar, and Şişli are the districts with the highest quality of life, while Gaziosmanpaşa, Esenler, Sultanbeyli, Sultangazi, and Arnavutköy districts are in the last place. As a result of the clustering study, when evaluated in terms of 5 clusters, it is observed that 4.8 percent of the population of Istanbul lives in the first level, which is the highest quality of life, while 15.9% are second, 31.5% are third, 36.2% are fourth, and 11.6% are in districts with a fifth level of quality of life.

Özet

Bu çalışma ilki 2011 yılında ikincisi 2016 yılında yayınlanan İstanbul’da 39 ilçeyi karşılaştıran yaşam kalitesi endeksinin güncel verilerle yenilendiği ve geçmiş yıllarla karşılaştırmaların yapıldığı bir araştırmadır. Periyodik olarak yapılan araştırmanın sonuçları İstanbul’daki ilçelerin yaşam kalitesi açısından dönüşümünü ortaya koymaktadır. Aynı yöntem ve parametreler üzerinden gerçekleştirilen çalışma yıllar itibariyle İstanbul’da ilçeler düzeyinde yaşam kalitesinin izlenmesini hedeflemektedir. İstanbul’da ilçe düzeyinde 2020 verileri ile yapılan analizde ağırlıklandırılmış ortalama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Endeks sonuçlarına göre Kadıköy, Beşiktaş, Bakırköy, Üsküdar ve Şişli yaşam kalitesinin en yüksek olduğu ilçeler iken, Gaziosmanpaşa, Esenler, Sultanbeyli, Sultangazi ve Arnavutköy ilçeleri sıralamada sonlarda yer almıştır. Yapılan kümeleme çalışması sonucunda 5 küme açısından değerlendirildiğinde, İstanbul nüfusunun yüzde 4,8’inin en yüksek yaşam kalitesi olan birinci düzeyde yaşadığı gözlenirken, %15,9’u ikinci, %31,5’i üçüncü, %36,2’si dördüncü ve %11,6’sı beşinci düzeyde yaşam kalitesine sahip ilçelerde bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, M., BAYPINAR, M. B., ÇELİKBIÇAK, G., ÖZBAY, B. K. (2023). Quality of Life Index: Istanbul 2020. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 72 - Sayı: 2, 543–568. https://ajindex.com/articles/877470

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. AFAD (2020). Ministry Disaster And Emergency Management Presidency. Retrieved from https:// en.afad.gov.tr/ google scholar Albrechts, L., Balducci, A., & Hillier, J. (2016). Situated practices of strategic planning. An international perspective. Routledge. google scholar Andrews, F. M. and Whitney, B.S., ( 1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press. google scholar Bache, I. (2013). Measuring quality of life for public policy: an idea whose time has come? Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 21-38. doi:10.1 080/13501763.2012.699658 google scholar Baypınar, M.B., Taş, A., and Şeker, M. (2018). İstanbul uluslararası finans merkezi yapılanmasına hizmet edecek bölgelerin fiziki ve sosyal gelişmişliğinin izlenmesine yönelik model. (Model for monitoring of physical and social development of zones serving the making Istanbul a financial center). Scientific Report. Tender no. 2017/200587. Greater Municipality of Istanbul, ITUNOVA, Vera Research Corp. google scholar Bilir, M. (2019). İstanbul’daki spor Istanbul çalışanlarının fiziksel aktivite ve yaşam kalitesi düzeyinin araştırılması (Master’s thesis, Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi). google scholar Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar Chow, S. M., Lo, S. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2005). Self-perceived quality of life of children and adolescents with physical disabilities in Hong Kong. Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 415-423. google scholar Council, N. R. (2002). Community and quality of life: Data needs for informed decision making. National Academy Press. Washington DC. google scholar Craglia, M., Leontidou, L., Nuvolati, G., & Schweikart, J. (2004). Towards the development of quality of life ındicators in the ‘digital’ city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(1), 5164. doi:10.1068/b12918 google scholar Doward, L. C., & McKenna, S. P. (2004). Defining patient-reported outcomes. Value in health, 7, S4-S8. google scholar Dülger Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., Baran, P. K., & Marans, R. W. (2009). İstanbul’da yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi. İTÜDERGİSİ/a, 7(2). google scholar Evans, D. R. (1994). Enhancing quality of life in the population at large. Social indicators research, 33(1), 47-88. google scholar Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2015). Sectoral resilience: conceptualizing industry-specific spatial patte