Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2023 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Coding Program Selection Using Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy and Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Processes

Pages
11–18
Publication Date
2023-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After performing the analysis by using the proposed method, it was found that technological facilities, diversity, cost and environmental conditions were the most critical factors according to SF-AHP and PF-AHP methodologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, coding is not a field that belongs only to software developers; it has become a field of interest to many people from different professions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The coding education designed for elementary school level resulting from the changes made in the curriculum has led to teaching analytical thinking to children.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After performing the analysis by using the proposed method, it was found that technological facilities, diversity, cost and environmental conditions were the most critical factors according to SF-AHP and PF-AHP methodologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Multi Criteria Decision Making · AHP · Spherical Fuzzy-AHP

Abstract

Today, coding is not a field that belongs only to software developers; it has become a field of interest to many people from different professions. The coding education designed for elementary school level resulting from the changes made in the curriculum has led to teaching analytical thinking to children. Deciding the most suitable software for children among all the options is an important issue. This paper aims to extend the classical Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and look at the spherical fuzzy analytical hierarchy (SF-AHP) method to show its applicability to the problems of coding software program selection for children through a comparative analysis using Pythagorean AHP (PF-AHP). After performing the analysis by using the proposed method, it was found that technological facilities, diversity, cost and environmental conditions were the most critical factors according to SF-AHP and PF-AHP methodologies. According to these criteria, the educational programming platform ‘Tynker’ was determined to be the best alternative using both these methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEPE, S. (2023). Coding Program Selection Using Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy and Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Processes. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 11–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/875904

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Saaty, T. L., (1986), Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 32 (7), 841-855
  2. Keskenler M.F. ve Keskenler E.F., (2017). Bulanık Mantığın Tarihi Gelişimi, Takvim-i Vekayi, 5(1),1-10
  3. Torra, V., (2010). Hesitant Fuzzy Sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25,529–539
  4. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L. ve Herrera, F., (2013). A Group Decision Making Model Dealing with Comparative Linguistic Expressions Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets, Information Sciences, 241,28-42
  5. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C. (2019). A Novel Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Using Emerging Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Sets. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 85, 307–323
  6. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning. Synthese, 30 (3-4), 407-428
  7. Bojadziev G., Bojadziev M. (1998). Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Applications, World Scientific, London
  8. Ertuğrul, İ., Tuş, A. (2007). Interactive Fuzzy Linear Programming and an Application Samplat a Textile Firm. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 6(1), 29-49
  9. Zimmermann, H. J. (1992). Methods and Applications of Fuzzy Mathematical Programming. In an Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications n Intelligent Systems 97-120. Springer, Boston, MA
  10. Wu, D., Mendel, J. M. (2008). A Vector Similarity Measure for Linguistic Approximation: Interval Type-2 and Type-1 Fuzzy Sets. Information Sciences, 178(2), 381-402
  11. Castillo, O., Melin, P., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (2007). Type-2 Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007),145-147. IEEE
  12. Xu, Z. (2014). Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Theory (Vol. 314). Cham: Springer International Publishing
  13. Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529- 539
  14. Tepe, S., Kaya, I. (2019) A Fuzzy-Based Risk Assessment Model for Evaluations of Hazards with a Real-Case Study, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 26(2), 512-537, DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1521262 [15] Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F. (2011). Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109-119
  15. Wang, F., Li, X., Chen, X. (2014). Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Set and Its Applications in Multicriteria Decision Making. Journal of Applied Mathematics
  16. Bustince, H., Burillo, P. (1996). Vague Sets are Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and S