Journals / Maliye ve Finans Yazıları / 2022 / Sayı: 118

The Ottoman International Trade Policies in the 19th Century World Economy

19. Yüzyıl Dünya Ekonomisinde Osmanlı Devleti Uluslararası Ticaret Politikaları

Pages
271–306
Publication Date
2022-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research is based on a historical event analysis of case study on the customs tariffs applied in the 19th century.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Ottoman State was established at the center of international trade routes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the expansion of its land period, the Ottoman State followed aggressive international trade relations with the powerful states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research is based on a historical event analysis of case study on the customs tariffs applied in the 19th century.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dış ticaret · tarife · Osmanlı

Abstract

The Ottoman State was established at the center of international trade routes. In the expansion of its land period, the Ottoman State followed aggressive international trade relations with the powerful states. Although it has been discussed in the past, the foreign trade policies implemented in the Ottoman have been recompiled and evaluated in the light of the data obtained recents decades. These policies and their effects were analyzed in comparison with the trade policies implemented by the leading countries in the world economy. The advantages and limitations of the Ottoman economy have been revealed. The research is based on a historical event analysis of case study on the customs tariffs applied in the 19th century.

Özet

Osmanlı Devleti’nin uluslararası ticaret yollarının merkezinde, kurulmuş, hızla topraklarını genişletmiş; bu süreçte dönemin güçlü devletleri ile uluslararası ticaret ilişkilerine önem vermişlerdir. Geçmişte, çok sayıda araştırmada ele alınmış olmasına rağmen, Osmanlı’ da uygulanan dış ticaret politikaları bugüne kadar elde edilmiş veriler ışığında yeniden derlenmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir. Bu politikalar ve sonuçları, dönemin dünyanın ekonomisinde önde gelen ülkelerin uyguladıkları dış ticaret politikaları ile karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Osmanlı ekonomisinin sahip olduğu üstünlükler ve kısıtlamalar ortaya konmuştur. Araştırma, temel olarak, tarihsel açıdan gümrük tarifelerinin karşılaştırılmasına ile ilgili literatür taramasına ve vaka çalışmasına dayanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINKAYA, Z. (2022). The Ottoman International Trade Policies in the 19th Century World Economy. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, Sayı: 118, 271–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/875742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Acartürk, E. ve R. Kılıç (2011).Osmanlı Devleti̇nde Kapi̇tülasyonların İkti̇sadi̇ Ve Si̇yasi̇ Perspekti̇ftenAnali̇zi̇. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi.Cilt 29. Sayı 2 ss.1-21
  2. Accominotti, O. and M. Flandreau (2008). Bilateral Treaties and the Most Favored Nation Clause: the Myth of Trade Liberalization in the Nineteenth Century. World Politics.Vol. 60.No. 2.pp. 147-188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40060194
  3. Agoston, Gabor(200 )Merces Prohibitae: The Anglo-Ottoman Trade In war Material Dependence Theory.Oriente Moderno. Nuova Serie. Anno 20. pp.177-192. http://www.jstor.com/stable/25817751
  4. Ay, Ahmet (2007) Türkiye'de Dış Ticaret ve Kur Politikaları Uygulamaları. Çizgi Kitabevi.İstanbul. Bailey,M.,A,Goldstein J. and B. R.Weingast (1997).The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade World Politics. Vol.49. No.3. pp.309-338https://www.jstor.org /stable/25054005 Bairoch, P.(1973)European Foreign Trade in the XIX Century: The Development of the Value and Volume of Exports Preliminary Results.Journal of European Economic History.Vol.,Issue.1, p:5 https://www.proquest.com/openview/0871c9267bd1266aff3274709658cd62/1?cbl=1819397&pq-origsite=gscholar
  5. Bairoch, P. (1989).The paradoxes of economic history: economic laws and history. European Economic Review, Vol.33, pp.225–249.https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:33:y:1989:i:2-3:p:225 -249 Barlett, Bruce (1997) The Truth about Trade in History. Edward, L. Hudgins, ed. Freedom to Trade: Refuting New Protectionism. Cato Institute. Bulbeck, D.,Reid, A.,Cheng, T.L. and W. Yiqi (1998) Southeast Asian Exports Since the 14th Century: Cloves, Pepper, Coffee, and Sugar.KITLV Press,
  6. Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, p.5. Brander, James A. and Barbara J.Spencer.(1985).Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry. Journal of International Economics.Vol.18.No.1-2.pp.83-100.http://.w1464.pdf (nber.org) Brock, Philip (2000) Trade Liberalization and the Lender of Last Resort by Philip Brock. Stanford University Center For Research On Economic Development And Policy Reform Working Paper No. 74.https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu /viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.197.9239&rep=rep1&type=pdf Chalmers, Henry (1931) American Foreign Trade, 1830-1930. Current History (1916-1940).Vol.33. No.5. pp. 661-666. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45339129
  7. Chin-Keong, Ng.(2017).Chapter Title: Commodity and Market