Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 41

Systemic View of Urban Public Space, Proposing a "Human-First" Model For Livable Interspaces/Interfaces.

Pages
508–516
Publication Date
2022-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

İn this context, a model proposal with a participatory apporoach has been developed which leads to research on the qualities of livable search interspace/interface.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Livability requires creating public spaces that can question the quality of cities and places, increase physical activity in urban life, and provide opportunities for social interaction in the built environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In national and international meetings such as Habitat II, Habitat III, Vision 2023, and Arama Conference, it has been stated that what is expected from a city whose basic reality is "human priority" is public space/place with the phenomenon of publicity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:İn this context, a model proposal with a participatory apporoach has been developed which leads to research on the qualities of livable search interspace/interface.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:The Phenomenon of Publicity · Human Friendly Space · Livable interface/interspace.

Abstract

Livability requires creating public spaces that can question the quality of cities and places, increase physical activity in urban life, and provide opportunities for social interaction in the built environment. In national and international meetings such as Habitat II, Habitat III, Vision 2023, and Arama Conference, it has been stated that what is expected from a city whose basic reality is "human priority" is public space/place with the phenomenon of publicity. With in the scope of the study of experts on the quality of urban space and the Jacops, Gehl, PPS, TOD models and approaches they have developed are explanied. Based on the inter-scale approach, systematic parts and urban networks from micro to macro scale are evaluated. İn this study the “neigbourhood” structure, which is the most basic unıt of the local scale, which reflects the social value of societies in addition to physcial characterics of the development of thecities was taken as a scale. Buıldıng-space, avenue-street, square etc. Openings are referred to as networks that make up the public system. İn this context, a model proposal with a participatory apporoach has been developed which leads to research on the qualities of livable search interspace/interface.

Özet

Livability requires creating public spaces that can question the quality of cities and places, increase physical activity in urban life, and provide opportunities for social interaction in the built environment. In national and international meetings such as Habitat II, Habitat III, Vision 2023, and Arama Conference, it has been stated that what is expected from a city whose basic reality is "human priority" is public space/place with the phenomenon of publicity. With in the scope of the study of experts on the quality of urban space and the Jacops, Gehl, PPS, TOD models and approaches they have developed are explanied. Based on the inter-scale approach, systematic parts and urban networks from micro to macro scale are evaluated. İn this study the “neigbourhood” structure, which is the most basic unıt of the local scale, which reflects the social value of societies in addition to physcial characterics of the development of thecities was taken as a scale. Buıldıng-space, avenue-street, square etc. Openings are referred to as networks that make up the public system. İn this context, a model proposal with a participatory apporoach has been developed which leads to research on the qualities of livable search interspace/interface.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, K. P. K., ÇELİKYAY, S. (2022). Systemic View of Urban Public Space, Proposing a "Human-First" Model For Livable Interspaces/Interfaces.. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 41, 508–516. https://ajindex.com/articles/875593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Amin, A. (2006). The Good City. Urban Studies 43, pp.1009-1023.
  2. Amare, S. (2014). Enhancing Livability of Squares and Streets: The Case of Romanat District. (Published Master Thesis). Mekelle CBD, Mekelle, Tigray, pp.32. Appleyard, D., (1981). Livable Streets. Berkeley University of California Press.
  3. Ashihara, Y. (1983).
  4. The Aesthetic Townscape. MIT Press,
  5. Cambridge. Baday, Ö.N. (2011). Modern Kent Mekanlarında Mahallenin Konumu. (Published Master Thesis). Selçuk Unıvercity. Konya. Bala, a.h. (2006). Mimarlık-şehircilik, bina-kent, iç-dış, özel-kamusal arasında: kentsel arayüzler. Yapı mimarlık-kültür-sanat dergisi. Vol. 293, 44-49.
  6. Barte, P. and Mulukutla, P. (2013). Parking and Transit Oriented Developments Presentation, The HUB, WRI INDIA. http://wricitieshub.org/contributors/paul-barter [09.05.2016].
  7. Bertlin, J. (2014). Socıal Sustaınability from the perspectıve of three concept: human scale, the city at eye level and publıc lıfe. (Published Degree Project In Urban And Plannıng). Advanced Cycle Stockholm, Kth Royal Instıtute Of Technology School Of Architecture And The Buılt Environment,.29-33
  8. Bilsel, G. (2002). Kent Kültürü - Kültürel Süreklilik ve Yaşanılası Kentsel Mekan Kavramı Üzerine, Kentleşme ve Yerel Yönetimler Sempozyumu. Çukurova Üniversitesi Adana Kent Konseyi-Yerel Gündem 21 Yayınları.(5). 107-114.
  9. Bloomberg, M., Burden, A., Burney, D., Farley, T. and Khan, J. (2013).
  10. Shaping the Sıdewalk Experıence, Active Design, Newyork, NYC. Carmona, M., Tiesdell,S., Heath,T., and Oc, T., (2010). Public places public spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Archtectural press, UK. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Mekânsal Planlama Genel Müdürlüğü. (2016). Kentsel Tasarım Rehberlerinin Hazırlanması. http://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/csb/dokumanlar/mpgm0002.pdf. [20.04.2016]
  11. Cilliers, E.J., Timmermans, W., Goorberg, F. and Slijkhuis, J.S.A. (2015). The Story Behind the Place: Creating Urban Spaces That Enhance Quality of Life, Applied research in Quality of Life. 10(4), 589-598.
  12. Conzen, M.R.G. (1960).
  13. Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town Plan Analysis, IBG Monograph No. 27, London. Elshater, A. (2012). New Urbanısm Principles Versus Urban Design Dimensions Toward Behavior Performance Efficiency İn Egyptian Neıghbourhood Unıt. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (68), 826–843.
  14. Erdönmez, E. (2005). Açık Kamusal Kent Mekânlarının Toplumsal İlişkileri Yapılandırmadaki Rolü, Büyükdere-Levent-Maslak Aksı. (Published PHD Thesis). Yıldız Teknik Univercity. İstan