SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

DIRTY DOZEN SCALE: ADAPTATION TO TURKISH, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY

KARANLIK ÜÇLÜ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRKÇE’ YE UYARLAMA, GÜVENİLİRLİK VE GEÇERLİLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Duygu TOPLU YAŞLIOĞLU
Özgür ATILGAN
Pages
725–739
Publication Date
2018-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, these findings show that the dark triad scale can be used as a reliable and valid tool to be used especially in the field of business management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to demonstrate the reliability and validity by adapting the scale called “Dark triad dirty dozen” to Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Employees who were in managerial positions in any enterprise were selected as research sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, these findings show that the dark triad scale can be used as a reliable and valid tool to be used especially in the field of business management.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dirty Dozen · Machiavellianism · Psychopathy

Abstract

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the reliability and validity by adapting the scale called “Dark triad dirty dozen” to Turkish. Employees who were in managerial positions in any enterprise were selected as research sample. In order to test the reliability and validity of the scale in Turkish language, data collected from two different samples. The results of the exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that three factor structre was confirmed. Since there is no problem in convergent and divergent validity tests, it can be argued that the scale is reliable and valid. In other words, these findings show that the dark triad scale can be used as a reliable and valid tool to be used especially in the field of business management.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı “Karanlık Üçlü” adı verilen, makyavelizm, psikopati ve narsizm kişilik özelliklerini ölçmek için kullanılmakta olan ölçeğin Türkçe’ye uyarlanarak güvenilirlik ve geçerliliğinin ortaya konulmasıdır. Bir işletmede yönetici pozisyonunda çalışanlar araştırma örneklemi olarak seçilmiştir. Ölçeğin Türkçe dilinde güvenilirlik ve geçerliliğinin test edilebilmesi için iki farklı örneklemden veriler toplanarak önce keşfedici ve daha sonra da doğrulayıcı faktör analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Yapılan analizler sonucunda ölçeğin üç faktörlü yapısının doğrulandığı görülmüştür. Ardından yapı geçerliliği için gerçekleştirilen yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerlilik testlerinde de herhangi bir sorun gözlenmediğinden ölçeğin güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçek olduğu ileri sürülebilmektedir. Söz konusu bu bulgular, karanlık üçlü ölçeğinin özellikle işletme yönetimi alanında yapılacak çalışmalarda kullanılabilmesi için güvenilir ve geçerli bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAŞLIOĞLU, D. T., ATILGAN, Ö. (2018). DIRTY DOZEN SCALE: ADAPTATION TO TURKISH, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 725–739. https://ajindex.com/articles/87523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aish, A. M. ve Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares, Quality and Quantity, 24(4), 405-426.
  2. Allsopp, J., Eysenck, H.J., ve Eysenck, S.B.G. (1991). Machiavellianism As a Component in Psychoticism and Extraversion, Personality and Individual Differences, 12(1), 29-41.
  3. Arlow, P. (1991). Personal Characteristics in College Students Evaluations of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 63-69.
  4. Babiak, P., ve Hare, R.D. (2006). Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work, New York, NY: HarperCollins. Bagozzi, R. P. ve Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  5. Baloch M.A, Meng, F., Xu Z. ve Cepede-Carrion I. (2017).
  6. Dark Triad, Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Counterproductive Work Work Behaviours: The Moderating Effect of Political Skills, Frontiers in Psychology, 8,1-14.
  7. Bentler, P. M. ve Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588. Bogart, L.M, Benotsch, E.G. ve Pavlovic, J.D.P. (2004).Feeling Superior But Threatened: The Relation of Narcissism to Social Comparison, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 35-44.
  8. Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall Fit in Covariance Structure Models: Two Types of Sample Size Effects, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256. Buffardi, L.E. ve Campbell, W.K. (2008).Narcissism and Social Networking Sites, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34,1303-1314.
  9. Buss, D. (1991).
  10. Evolutionary Personality Psychology, Annual Review of Pyschology, 42, 459-491.
  11. Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Multivariate Applications Series), New York: Routledge. Carmines, E. G. ve Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment (Vol. 17). New York: Sage publications. Christie R. ve Geis, F. (1970).
  12. Studies in Machiavelliansim, New York, NY: Academic Press.
  13. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98. Czarna A.Z., Jonason P.K., Dufner M. ve Kossowska M. (2016). The Dirty Dozen Scale: Validation of a Polish Version and Extension of the Nomological Net, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 445. Dahling, J.J., Whitaker, B.G. ve Levy, P.E. (2009). The Development and Validat