Journals / EDUCATIONE / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Research Self-Efficacy According to Different Variables and Determination of Predictors

Öğretmen Adaylarında Araştırma Özyeterliliğinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi ve Yordayıcılarının Belirlenmesi

Journal
EDUCATIONE
Pages
137–147
Publication Date
2018-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was found that the variables of control beliefs, the belief that learning depends on effort, the belief that learning depends on ability and the belief that there is only one truth do not significantly predict research selfefficacy of pre-service teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine whether self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service teachers differ according to specific characteristics they have and to determine predictors of their perceptions of research self-efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, whether the variables of research anxiety, control beliefs, intrinsic goal orientation, extrinsic goal orientation, task value, test anxiety, the belief that learning depends on effort, the belief that learning depends on ability, and the belief that there is only one truth are significant predictors of research self-efficacy were tested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was found that the variables of control beliefs, the belief that learning depends on effort, the belief that learning depends on ability and the belief that there is only one truth do not significantly predict research selfefficacy of pre-service teachers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Araştırma özyeterliliği · Araştırmaya yönelik kaygı · Güdülenme

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service teachers differ according to specific characteristics they have and to determine predictors of their perceptions of research self-efficacy. In this context, whether mean scores of pre-service teachers’ research self-efficacy differ according to their taking the courses of scientific research methods and statistics, their taking the course of scientific research methods and participating in a scientific activity related to their field, and lastly their taking the course of scientific research methods and being actively involved in a project were examined. Besides, whether the variables of research anxiety, control beliefs, intrinsic goal orientation, extrinsic goal orientation, task value, test anxiety, the belief that learning depends on effort, the belief that learning depends on ability, and the belief that there is only one truth are significant predictors of research self-efficacy were tested. The research was conducted within the scope of associational model. Data were collected from 810 pre-service teachers having initial teacher training at Ankara University. However, two-way ANOVA test was carried out with the data of 574 participants, and multiple linear regression (stepwise) analysis was carried out with the data of 261 participants who took the course of scientific research methods during undergraduate education. Analysis results reveal that interaction effects of taking the course of scientific research methods and participating in a scientific activity related to their field on average scores of research self-efficacy are not significant. On the other hand, the interaction effects of taking the course of scientific research methods and being actively involved in a project are significant; however, it was determined that its effect size is near zero. In addition, it was found that the variables of control beliefs, the belief that learning depends on effort, the belief that learning depends on ability and the belief that there is only one truth do not significantly predict research selfefficacy of pre-service teachers. On the other hand, it was found that task value, research anxiety, extrinsic goal orientation, intrinsic goal orientation, and test anxiety significantly predict research self-efficacy

Özet

Bu araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının araştırma özyeterliliğine ilişkin algılarının sahip oldukları belirli özelliklere göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığının ve araştırma özyeterlilik algılarının yordayıcılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu çerçevede öğretmen adaylarının araştırma özyeterliliği puan ortalamalarının bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve istatistik derslerini alma durumuna, bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri dersi alma ve alanıyla ilgili bilimsel bir etkinliğe katılma durumuna ve son olarak bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri dersi alma ve bir projede aktif görev alma durumuna göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı test edilmiştir. Ayrıca araştırmaya yönelik kaygısı, kontrol inancı, içsel hedef düzenleme, dışsal hedef düzenleme, görev değeri, sınav kaygısı, öğrenmenin çabaya bağlı olduğuna inanç, öğrenmenin yeteneğe bağlı olduğuna inanç ve tek bir doğrunun var olduğuna inanç değişkenlerinin araştırma özyeterliliğinin manidar birer yordayıcısı olup olmadığı test edilmiştir. Araştırma ilişkisel model bağlamında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler Ankara Üniversitesinde pedagojik formasyon eğitimi alan toplam 810 öğretmen adayından toplanmış, ancak iki faktörlü varyans analizi testleri 574 katılımcının ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi (aşamalı) ise lisans eğitiminde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri dersi alan 261 katılımcının verileri üzerinden yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri dersini alma ile istatistik dersi alma ve bilimsel bir etkinliğe katılma durumu değişkenlerinin araştırma özyeterliliği puanları üzerindeki ortak etkilerinin manidar olmadığı, buna karşılık bir araştırma projesinde aktif görev alma durumuyla olan ortak etkisinin manidar olduğu, ancak etki büyüklüğünün sıfıra yakın olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Diğer taraftan, öğretmen adaylarının kontrol inancı, öğrenmenin çabaya bağlı olduğuna inanç, öğrenmenin yeteneğe bağlı olduğuna inanç ve tek bir doğrunun var olduğuna inanç değişkenlerinin araştırma özyeterliliği değişkenini manidar bir biçimde yordamadığı, ancak görev değeri, araştırmaya yönelik kaygı, dışsal hedef düzenleme, içsel hedef düzenleme ve sınav kaygısı değişkenlerinin araştırma özyeterliliği değişkenini manidar bir biçimde yordadığı belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKERCİOĞLU, G., BÖKEOĞLU, Ö. Ç., BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2018). Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Research Self-Efficacy According to Different Variables and Determination of Predictors. EDUCATIONE, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 137–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/875138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Arslantaş, H.A. (2015). Epistemological beliefs and academic achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), 215-220. DOI:10.11114/jets.v4i1.1107 Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122– 147. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 Bard, C.C., Bieschke, K.J., Herbert, J.T., & Eberz, A.B. (2000). Predicting research interest among rehabilitation counseling students and faculty. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44(1), 48- 55. DOI:10.1177/ 003435520004400107 Bell, P.D. (2006). Can factors related to self-regulated learning and epistemological beliefs predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous web-based courses?. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 3(7), 1-17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2047299
  3. Bieschke, K.J. (2006) Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 77- 91. DOI: 10.1177/1069072705281366 Bieschke, K.J., Bishop, R.M., & Garcia, V.L. (1996). The utility of the search self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 59-75. DOI: 10.1177/106907279600400104 Bishop, R.M., & Bieschke, K.J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 45(2), 182-188. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.45.2.182 Buehl, M.M., & Alexander, P.A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychological Review, 13(4), 385-418. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FA%3A10119179147 56.pdf Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1997). Araştırmaya yönelik kaygı ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(4), 453- 464. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/kuey/article/view/5000050958/5000048190
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö.E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 231-239. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aedd/bf1bee84cc34ca4735fd e4dfe66db4d915f7.pdf Büyüköztürk, Ş., Atalay, K., Sozgun, Z., & Kebapçı, Ş. (2011). The development of research self- efficacy scale. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 1, 22-29. https://www.researchgate.net/publica