Journals / ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Comparative Analysis of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission of Wheat Farming in Edirne Province of Türkiye

Edirne İlinde Buğday Üretiminde Enerji Kullanım Etkinliği ve Sera Gazı Emisyonunun Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Pages
277–286
Publication Date
2022-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it was determined that wheat production in the enterprises that had soil analysis was more efficient in terms of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions compared to enterprises that did not have analysis and these results revealed the importance of having soil analysis and applying fertilizer amounts according to soil analysis results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine the energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission of wheat production in enterprises that had soil analysis or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A survey was conducted with 60 producers who had soil analysis in three laboratories in Edirne province, which accepted the most sampling for soil analysis and gave fertilizer recommendations in 2015 and 40 producers who did not have soil analysis in the same region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it was determined that wheat production in the enterprises that had soil analysis was more efficient in terms of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions compared to enterprises that did not have analysis and these results revealed the importance of having soil analysis and applying fertilizer amounts according to soil analysis results.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Buğday · enerji kullanımı · sera gazı emisyonu

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission of wheat production in enterprises that had soil analysis or not. A survey was conducted with 60 producers who had soil analysis in three laboratories in Edirne province, which accepted the most sampling for soil analysis and gave fertilizer recommendations in 2015 and 40 producers who did not have soil analysis in the same region. Thus, a total of 100 producers were interviewed. Energy use efficiency, energy productivity, specific energy and net energy were 3.54, 0.20 kg MJ-1, 5.09 MJ kg-1 and 60191.34 MJ in the enterprises that had soil analysis, respectively. On the other hand, these values were 3.19, 0.17 kg MJ-1, 5.74 MJ kg-1, and 54508.49 MJ in the enterprises that did not have soil analysis. Greenhouse gas (GHG) ratios per kg were found as 0.66 and 0.72 for the wheat production in the enterprises that had and did not have soil analysis, respectively. In the enterprises that had soil analysis, the shares of the chemical fertilizers in energy use and total GHG emissions were lower than the other producer group. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that wheat production in the enterprises that had soil analysis was more efficient in terms of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions compared to enterprises that did not have analysis and these results revealed the importance of having soil analysis and applying fertilizer amounts according to soil analysis results.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Edirne ilinde toprak analizi yaptıran ve yaptırmayan işletmelerde buğday üretiminin enerji kullanım etkinliği ve sera gazı emisyonunun belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Edirne ilinde toprak analizi için en fazla numune alımı kabul eden ve gübre tavsiyesi veren üç laboratuvarda 2015 yılında toprak analizi yaptıran 60 üretici ve aynı bölgede toprak analizi yaptırmayan 40 üretici ile anket çalışması yapılmış olup, toplamda 100 üretici ile görüşülmüştür. Toprak analizi yaptıran işletmelerde enerji kullanım etkinliği, enerji verimliliği, spesifik enerji ve net enerji sırasıyla 3,54, 0,20 kg MJ-1, 5,09 MJ kg-1 ve 60191.34 MJ, toprak analizi yaptırmayan işletmelerde ise sırasıyla 3,19, 0,17 kg MJ-1, 5,74 MJ kg-1 ve 54508.49 MJ olarak bulunmuştur. Toprak analizi yaptıran ve yaptırmayan işletmelerde buğday üretimi için kg başına sera gazı oranları sırasıyla 0,66 ve 0,72 olarak bulunmuştur. Toprak analizi yaptıran işletmelerde kimyasal gübrelerin enerji kullanımı ve toplam sera gazı emisyonlarındaki payları diğer üretici grubuna göre daha düşüktür. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, toprak analizi yaptıran işletmelerde buğday üretiminin enerji kullanımı ve sera gazı emisyonları bakımından analiz yaptırmayan işletmelere göre daha verimli olduğu belirlenmiş olup, bu sonuçlar toprak analizi yaptırmanın ve gübre miktarını toprak analiz sonuçlarına göre uygulamanın önemini ortaya çıkarmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, B., ÖZKAN, E., GÜRBÜZ, M. A., KURŞUN, İ., KAYHAN, İ. E. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission of Wheat Farming in Edirne Province of Türkiye. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 277–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/874545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abbas, A., M. Yang, R. Ahmad, K. Yousaf, and T. Iqbal. 2017. Energy use efficiency in wheat production: A case study of Paunjab Pakistan. Fresenius Environ Bull. 28 (11): 6773-6779.
  2. Altuntaş, E., O.N. Bulut, and E. Özgöz. 2019. Energy use efficiency analysis of wheat production with different soil systems in dry agriculture. Anadolu J Agr Sci. 34 (2019): 57-64. Anonymous 2022c. IBM® SPSS® Statistics 26 Algorithms. Licensed materials property of IBM corporation © copyright IBM corporation and other(s), International. Anonymous. 2015. Harmonised Calculations of Biofuel Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe. BioGrace, Utrecht, The Netherlands. http://www.biograce.net. Anonymous. 2021. 2020 Yılı Hububat Sektör Raporu. https://www.tmo.gov.tr/Upload/Document/ sektorraporlari/hububat2020.pdf (Accessed 20.05.2022). Anonymous. 2022a. Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri. Erişim adresi: http://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr (Accessed 22.05.2022). Anonymous. 2022b. Turkish Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2020. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/iklim/icerikler/ sera_gazi_em-syon-raporu-20200506141834.pdf (Accessed 20.05.2022).
  3. Clark, S., B. Khoshnevisan, and P. Sefeedpari. 2016. Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions during transition to organic and reduced-input practices: Student farm case study. Ecol. Eng. 88: 186-194.
  4. Erdal, G., K. Esengün, H. Erdal, and O. Gündüz. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat Province of Türkiye. Energy 32 (1): 35-41.
  5. Eren, O., O. Gokdogan, and M. F. Baran. 2019. Determination of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the production of different plants in Türkiye. Fresenius Environ Bull. 28(2A): 1158-1166.
  6. Ghorbani, R., F. Mondani, S. Amirmoradi, H. Feizi, S. Khorramdel, and M. Teimouri. 2011. A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dry land wheat production systems. Appl. Energy 88 (1): 283-288.
  7. Gökdoğan, O., and B. Sevim. 2016. Determination of energy balance of wheat production in Türkiye: A case study of Eskil District of Aksaray Province. J. Tekirdag Agric. Fac. 13 (04): 36-43.
  8. Güldal, H.T. 2016. Buğday yetiştiriciliğinde toprak analizi sonucuna göre kullanılan gübrenin maliyete etkilerinin belirlenmesi: Konya İli Cihanbeyli İlçesi örneği. Yüksek lisans tezi. A. Ü. Zir. Fak. Fen Bil. Ens. Tarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı - Ankara.
  9. Gültekin, R., S. Aykanat, Y. Korkmaz, and H.A. Karaağaç. 2016. Energy balance of different tillage and sowing systems in wheat production. Jou