SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Aviation / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Birds vs. Metalic Birds: A review of Bird Strikes in Aviation

Rıdvan ORUÇ
Şafak AKTEMUR
Mehmet YAŞAR
Öztürk Özdemir KANAT
Pages
372–379
Publication Date
2022-11-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the results were evaluated, it was concluded that bird strikes are an essential factor to consider for safety and risk management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study gathered statistical data about bird strikes from various countries, including Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, data on bird strikes per 10000 flights, distribution of the number of birds strikes according to months, phases of flight, the components hit by the birds, and the time of the event occurred on a day were presented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the results were evaluated, it was concluded that bird strikes are an essential factor to consider for safety and risk management.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bird Strike · Safety · Safety Management

Abstract

This study gathered statistical data about bird strikes from various countries, including Türkiye. The study aims to compare the bird strike events that occurred in Türkiye and other countries by investigating bird strike data analysis from targeted countries. In this context, data on bird strikes per 10000 flights, distribution of the number of birds strikes according to months, phases of flight, the components hit by the birds, and the time of the event occurred on a day were presented. The data includes findings from Türkiye, USA, UK, Australia, Finland, Iran, and Czechia. When the results were evaluated, it was concluded that bird strikes are an essential factor to consider for safety and risk management. It is crucial that countries must conduct regular reporting to manage this safety issue. With the help of appropriate modelling conducted via proper measurements, the industry will come a long way in solving the safety issues caused by bird strikes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORUÇ, R., AKTEMUR, Ş., YAŞAR, M., KANAT, Ö. Ö. (2022). Birds vs. Metalic Birds: A review of Bird Strikes in Aviation. Journal of Aviation, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 372–379. https://ajindex.com/articles/872801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Airbus. (2004). Flight Operations Briefing Notes. http://wildlifecenter.pr.erau.edu/flightOperations/airbus_flightop.pdf
  2. Allan, J. R. (2000). The costs of bird strikes and bird strike prevention. Human Conflicts with Wildlife: Economic Considerations, 18, 147–153.
  3. ATAG. (2008). Economic and Social Benefits of Air Transport. Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2019). Australian aviation wildlife strike statistics, 2008-2017. CAA. (n.d.). Reported birdstrikes 2012-2016. https://www.caa.co.uk/media/ynyhgvh0/20170316-reported-birdstrikes-2012-2016.pdf
  4. Cbc.ca (2017), Robotic falcons to scare away real birds at Edmonton airport, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-airport-robots-birds-falcons-1.4106703#:~:text= Edmonton/20International%20Airport%20will%20soon,paths/20and/20discourage/20nearby/20nesting. Cleary, E. C., & Dickey., A. (2010). Guidebook for Addressing Aircraft/Wildlife Hazards at General Aviation Airports. In Guidebook for Addressing Aircraft/Wildlife Hazards at General Aviation Airports. Transportation Research Board. Coban, R., & Bahar, İ. (2018). A Research on Wildlife Management in Aviation in Hamid Karzai International Airport (Kabul-Afghanistan). Journal of Aviation, 2(2), 87–104.
  5. Dogan, M. O. (2019). Wildlife management in aerodromes and analysis, Master of Science Thesis. Eskisehir Osmangazi University. Dolbeer, R. A., Wright, S. E., & Eschenfelder, P. E. (2005). Animal ambush at the airport: The need to broaden ICAO standards for bird strikes to include terrestrial wildlife. International Bird Strike Committee, 1, 102–113.
  6. ASA. (2013). Bird strike, a European risk with local specificities. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/EGAST_GA6-bird-strikes-final.pdf
  7. FAA. (1970). 14 CFR § 25.631 - Bird strike damage. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/media/TAEgshT1&2-3151993.pdf
  8. FAA. (2021). Wildlife Strikes to Civil Aircraft in the United States, 1990–2020. General Directorate Of State Airports Authority. (2018). Havalimanları İşletme Hizmetleri Yönergesi. Doc 01. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Lists/KanunveYonetmelikler/Attachments/206/DHMI-Havalimanlari-Isletme-Hizmetleri-Yonergesi.pdf
  9. Gerede, Ender; Yaşar, M. (2017). Evaluation of Safety Performance Indicators of Flight Training Organization in Turkey. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(29), 1174–1207.
  10. Gokyuzuhaberci.com. (2011). Antakya Havaalanı'na Kuş Radarı. https://www.gokyuzuhaberci.com/antakya-havaalani-na-kus-ra