Journals / Journal of Aviation / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Artificial Intelligence Supported Aircraft Maintenance Strategy Selection with q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

Pages
260–265
Publication Date
2022-11-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article might be the first quantitative research that evaluates and compares AI-supported aircraft maintenance strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the aviation sector as unscheduled maintenance, repair and overhaul cost too much and these activities also negatively affect the prestige of the companies, deciding the most appropriate maintenance strategy is crucial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Stable and efficient results are obtained regarding the selection of an appropriate maintenance strategy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article might be the first quantitative research that evaluates and compares AI-supported aircraft maintenance strategies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aircraft maintenance · Decision making · q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS

Abstract

In the aviation sector as unscheduled maintenance, repair and overhaul cost too much and these activities also negatively affect the prestige of the companies, deciding the most appropriate maintenance strategy is crucial. Today artificial intelligence methods, especially machine learning techniques facilitate failure detection and predict the wear and tear of the equipment before the occurrence of a serious failure. In this paper, artificial intelligence-supported corrective, predictive, and prescriptive maintenance methods are examined. Those most common aircraft maintenance approaches are compared regarding cost, reliability, failure detection, and downtime period using decision makers' subjective evaluations with the help of the q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method which mitigates the drawbacks of uncertainty in human decision making. Stable and efficient results are obtained regarding the selection of an appropriate maintenance strategy. This article might be the first quantitative research that evaluates and compares AI-supported aircraft maintenance strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

PINAR, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Supported Aircraft Maintenance Strategy Selection with q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Journal of Aviation, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 260–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/872789

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adhikari, P. P., & Buderath, M. (2016). A framework for aircraft maintenance strategy including CBM. PHM Society European Conference, Ahmadi, A., Söderholm, P., & Kumar, U. (2007). An overview of trends in aircraft maintenance program development: past, present, and future. European Safety and Reliability Conference: 25/06/2007-27/06/2007,
  2. Amruthnath, N., & Gupta, T. (2018). A research study on unsupervised machine learning algorithms for early fault detection in predictive maintenance. 2018 5th international conference on industrial engineering and applications (ICIEA), Andrade, P., Silva, C., Ribeiro, B., & Santos, B. F. (2021). Aircraft maintenance check scheduling using reinforcement learning. Aerospace, 8(4), 113. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
  3. Basora, L., Bry, P., Olive, X., & Freeman, F. (2021). Aircraft fleet health monitoring with anomaly detection techniques. Aerospace, 8(4), 103. Basri, E. I., Razak, I. H. A., Ab-Samat, H., & Kamaruddin, S. (2017). Preventive maintenance (PM) planning: a review. Journal of quality in maintenance engineering. Beliën, J., Cardoen, B., & Demeulemeester, E. (2012). Improving workforce scheduling of aircraft line maintenance at Sabena Technics. Interfaces, 42(4), 352-364.
  4. Biswal, S., & Sabareesh, G. (2015). Design and development of a wind turbine test rig for condition monitoring studies. 2015 international conference on industrial instrumentation and control (icic), Cawley, G. C., & Talbot, N. L. (2010). On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2079-2107.
  5. Chen, D., Wang, X., & Zhao, J. (2012). Aircraft maintenance decision system based on real-time condition monitoring. Procedia Engineering, 29, 765-769.
  6. Dinis, D., Barbosa-Póvoa, A., & Teixeira, Â. P. (2019). Valuing data in aircraft maintenance through big data analytics: A probabilistic approach for capacity planning using Bayesian networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 920-936.
  7. Durbhaka, G. K., & Selvaraj, B. (2016). Predictive maintenance for wind turbine diagnostics using vibration signal analysis based on collaborative recommendation approach. 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Eickemeyer, S. C., Borcherding, T., Schäfer, S., & Nyhuis, P. (2013). Validation of data fusion as a method for forecasting the regeneration workload for comp