Journals / Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of hardaliye produced by different starters: Back-slopping and kombucha

Pages
60–68
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, thanks to the metabolic activities of the kombucha mushroom microorganisms and their symbiotic association, natural fermentation takes place without any preservative chemicals in KH and more durable hardaliye production is provided compared to BH.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During traditional hardaliye production by fermentation from grape juice, mustard seeds are insufficient to inhibit yeast activities and alcohol formation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fermentation continued for 7 days (d) and storage for 14 d.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, thanks to the metabolic activities of the kombucha mushroom microorganisms and their symbiotic association, natural fermentation takes place without any preservative chemicals in KH and more durable hardaliye production is provided compared to BH.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hardaliye · Kombucha · Back-slopping

Abstract

During traditional hardaliye production by fermentation from grape juice, mustard seeds are insufficient to inhibit yeast activities and alcohol formation. Chemical preservatives are used for the production of hardaliye of standard quality in traditional and industrial production. Today, consumers prefer natural products that do not contain chemical preservatives and additives. For this reason, in this study, considering that different production techniques should be tried in order to prevent alcohol formation, hardaliye production was carried out with two different methods as back-slopping (BH) and addition of kombucha mushrooms (KH). These methods were tried for the first time on hardaliye. Fermentation continued for 7 days (d) and storage for 14 d. During fermentation, pH and reducing sugar, L* and a* values of samples decreased, while phenolic compounds’ concentration, viscosity, and b* values increased. The pH continued to drop during storage. No significant changes were observed in reducing sugar contents. During storage, phenolic content of KH sample decreased and viscosity and L* values increased. The titratable acidity increase was greater in BH sample compared to the KH sample. While 5.5% alcohol formation was observed in the BH sample on the 7th day of fermentation, no alcohol formation was detected in the KH sample At the end of fermentation and storage, Total mesophilic aerobic bacteria (TMAB), yeast, Lactobacillus spp. and lactic streptococci numbers were found to be higher in BH sample than in KH sample. According to the results of the research, thanks to the metabolic activities of the kombucha mushroom microorganisms and their symbiotic association, natural fermentation takes place without any preservative chemicals in KH and more durable hardaliye production is provided compared to BH.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKCAN, A., ÇOŞKUN, F., ÖKSÜZ, Ö. (2022). Comparison of hardaliye produced by different starters: Back-slopping and kombucha. Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 60–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/870960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmed, Z., Wang, Y., Anjum, N., Ahmad, A., & Khan, S.T. (2013). Characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 isolated from Tibet kefir-part II. Food Hydrocolloids, 30, 343-350.
  2. Akarca, G., & Tomar, O. (2020). Kırmızı ve mor sebzelerle hazırlanan kombucha çaylarının kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 33(2), 215-222.
  3. Altay, F., Karbancıoglu-Güler, F., Daskaya-Dikmen, C., & Heperkan, D. (2013). A review on traditional Turkish fermented non-alcoholic beverages: microbiota, fermentation process and quality characteristics. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 167(1), 44-56.
  4. Amerine, M. A., Roessler, E. B., & Ough, C. S. (1965). Acids and the acid taste. I. The effect of pH and titratable acidity. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16(1), 29-37.
  5. Arici, M., & Coskun, F. (2001). Hardaliye: Fermented grape juice as a traditional Turkish beverage. Food Microbiology, 18(4), 417-421.
  6. Arici, M., Coşkun, F., Çelikyurt, G., Mirik, M., Gülcü, M., & Tokatli, N. (2017). Some technological and functional properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from hardaliye. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23(4), 428-437.
  7. Arıkan, M. (2018). Kombucha’daki (ay mantarı) Mikrobiyal Kompozisyonun Biyoinformatik Analizi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi,
  8. Fen Bilimleri Ensititüsü, Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik Ana Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  9. Aşkın, B., & Atik, A. (2016). Color, phenolic composition, and antioxidant properties of hardaliye (fermented grape beverage) under different storage conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 40(6), 803-812.
  10. Aydogdu, H., Yıldırım, Ş., Halkman, A.K., & Durgun, T. (2014). A study on production and quality criteria of hardaliye; a traditional drink from Thrace region of Turkey. Gıda, 39(3), 139-145.
  11. Ayed, L., Ben Abid, S., & Hamdi, M. (2017). Development of a beverage from red grape juice fermented with the Kombucha consortium. Annals of Microbiology, 67(1), 111-121.
  12. Bayram, M., Esin, Y., Kaya, C., İlhan, M., Akın, G., & Etdöğer, R. (2015). Geleneksel yöntemle müşküle üzümünden üretilen hardaliyenin bazı özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Akademik Gıda, 13(2), 119-126.
  13. Bergmann, R.S.D.O., Pereira, M.A., Veiga, S.M.O.M., Schneedorf, J.M., Oliveira, N.D.M.S., & Fiorini, J.E. (2010). Microbial profile of a kefir sample preparations: grains in natura and lyophilized and fermented suspension. Food Science and Technology, 30(4), 1022-1026. Boehringer-Mannheim (198