SavedAdd your journal

Journals / SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

SUBJECTIVE SLEEP QUALITY IN QUITTERS VERSUS NONQUITTERS ON A TOBACCO SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM

SİGARAYI BIRAKMA PROGRAMINDA SİGARA İÇENLERE KARŞI BIRAKANLARDA SUBJEKTİF UYKU KALİTESİ

Derya Çelebi AYDIN
Haydar Celal KARLIKAYA
Prof. Dr. Levent ÖZTÜRK
Pages
553–559
Publication Date
2022-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results Based on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, the rate of good sleepers was 23.8% in quitters and 7.8% in non-quitters (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective Sleep related factors may affect compliance of tobacco smokers to a cessation program.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was designed to assess sleep quality among individuals who were at least 1 year smoking free versus individuals who failed to quit smoking.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results Based on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, the rate of good sleepers was 23.8% in quitters and 7.8% in non-quitters (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pittsburgh Uyku Kalitesi İndeksi · Sigara Bırakma · Sigara İçmek

Abstract

Objective Sleep related factors may affect compliance of tobacco smokers to a cessation program. This study was designed to assess sleep quality among individuals who were at least 1 year smoking free versus individuals who failed to quit smoking. Material and Method In total, 682 individuals who were on a smoking cessation program between March 2004 and February 2011 were examined for suitability and invited by phone call for this cross-sectional study. Of those, 106 patients (Male/Female, 67/39) agreed to participate and included to the final analysis. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, respiratory function test results, and carbon monoxide measurements were compared between quitters (n=42) and non-quitters (n=64). Results Based on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, the rate of good sleepers was 23.8% in quitters and 7.8% in non-quitters (p

Özet

Amaç Uyku kalitesi ile ilişkili faktörler sigara kullananların bırakma programına uyumları ile ilişkilidir. Bu çalışma, en az bir yıldır sigara kullanımını bırakmada başarılı olan ve olamayan kişiler arasındaki uyku kalitesini karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem Sigara bırakma programında olan toplam 682 kişi Mart 2004-Şubat 2011 tarihleri arasında çalışmaya alınma uygunluğu açısından incelenmiş ve uygun olanlar telefon ile çalışmaya katılmaya davet edilmişlerdir. Davet edilenlerden 106 kişi (Erkek/Kadın 67/39) çalışmaya katılmayı kabul etmiş ve final analizlerine dahil edilmişlerdir. Pittsburgh uyku kalite indeksi skorları, solunum fonksiyon testi ve karbon monoksit ölçümleri başarılı bir şekilde sigarayı bırakanlar (n=42) ve bırakamayanlar (n=64) arasında karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular Sigarayı bırakanların bırakmayanlara göre uyku kalitelerinin daha iyi olduğu saptandı. Pittsburgh uyku kalitesi indeksine göre bırakan olguların %23,8’i (10/42), sigarayı bırakmayanların ise sadece %7,8’i (5/64) iyi uyku kalitesi skoruna sahipti (p=0.021). Sigarayı bırakanların vücut ağırlığı ortalama 8,33 kg, vücut kitle indeksi ortalama 3,13 artmıştı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, D. Ç., KARLIKAYA, H. C., ÖZTÜRK, P. D. L. (2022). SUBJECTIVE SLEEP QUALITY IN QUITTERS VERSUS NONQUITTERS ON A TOBACCO SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 553–559. https://ajindex.com/articles/870551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Veronda AC, Irish LA, Delahanty DL. Effect of smoke exposure on young adults' sleep quality. Nurs Health Sci 2020;22(1):57- 63
  2. Cohrs S, Rodenbeck A, Riemann D, Szagun B, Jaehne A, Brinkmeyer J et al. Impaired sleep quality and sleep duration in smokers – results from the German Multicenter Study on Nicotine Dependence. Addiction Biology 2014;19(3):486-96 3. Bellatorre A, Choi K, Lewin D, Haynie D, Simons-Morton B. Relationships between smoking and sleep problems in black and white adolescents. Sleep 2017;40(1):1-8 4. Liao Y, Xie L, Chen X, Kelly BC, Qi C, Pan C et al. Sleep quality in cigarette smokers and nonsmokers: findings from the general population in central China. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):808 5. Brett EI, Miller MB, Leavens ELS, Lopez SV, Wagener TL, Leffingwell TR. Electronic cigarette use and sleep health in young adults. J Sleep Res 2020;29(3):e12902 6. Zvolensky MJ, D’Souza J, Garey L, Alfano CA, Mayorga NA, Peraza N et al.Subjective sleep quality and electronic cigarette dependence, perceived risks of use, and perceptions about quitting electronic cigarettes. Addictive Behaviors 2020;102:106199 7. Li H, Liu Y, Xing L, Yang X, Xu J, Ren Q et al. Assocation of cigarette smoking with sleep disturbance and neurotransmitters in cerebrospinal fluid. Nature and Science of Sleep 2020;12:801-8 8. Lowery CL 3rd, Elliott C, Cooper A, Hadden C, Sonon RN, Azadi P et al. Cigarette smoking-associated alterations in serotonin/ adrenalin signaling pathways of platelets. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6(5):e005465
  3. Al Ryalat SA, Kussad S, El Khatib O, Hamad I, AL-Tanjy A, Alshneikat M et al. Assessing the effect of nicotine dose in cigarette smoking on sleep quality. Sleep and Breathing 2020; doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02238-3. Online ahead of print 10. Nair US, Haynes P, Collins BN. Baseline sleep quality is a significant predictor of quit-day smoking self-efficacy among low-income treatment-seeking smokers. J Health Psychol 2019;24(11):1484-93 11. Sujarwoto S. Sleep disturbance in Indonesia: how much does smoking contribute? Behavioral Sleep Medicine 2020;18:760- 73 12. Boskabady MH, Dehghani H, Esmaeilzadeh M. Pulmonary Function Tests and Their Reversibility in Smokers. Tanaffos 2003;2(8):23-30 13. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry. 1994 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152(3):1107-36 14. Ağargün MY, Kara H, Anlar Ö. Pittsburgh Uyku Kalitesi İndeksi’nin Geçerliliği ve Güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1996;7(2):107-15 15. Ba