Journals / Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Production and characterization of heat retardant fiber-reinforced geopolymer plates

Pages
282–290
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the next stage, fiber-reinforced plates were prepared, thermal experiments were carried out, and discussions and conclusions were formed according to the results and findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents an alternative environment-friendly thermal insulation material for the construction industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to produce this building material with superior heat resistance properties and comparable strength to the concrete produced with Ordinary Portland Cement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the next stage, fiber-reinforced plates were prepared, thermal experiments were carried out, and discussions and conclusions were formed according to the results and findings.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fiber-Reinforced · Geopolymer · Thermal Instulation

Abstract

This paper presents an alternative environment-friendly thermal insulation material for the construction industry. We aimed to produce this building material with superior heat resistance properties and comparable strength to the concrete produced with Ordinary Portland Cement. The primary purpose of the experimental studies is to produce a basic geopolymeric plate and to add cellubor and polypropylene fibers to the geopolymeric mortar. In the next stage, fiber-reinforced plates were prepared, thermal experiments were carried out, and discussions and conclusions were formed according to the results and findings. This study initially produced different types of fiber-based metakaolin plates with high heat resistance. Then, the flame test examined the heat resistance of the composite plates formed by the mixture of fibers consisting of cellubor, polypropylene, and cellubor + polypropylene fiber mixtures into geopolymeric mortars. It was found that the metakaolin plates containing approximately 6% by weight of Cellubor in the structure, besides their serious resistance to flame, their heat retardancy properties gave 72% better results than Kalekim (cementitious ceramic tile adhesive) plates and 55% better results than non-fiber metakaolin plates.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEZER, T., AKARKEN, G., CENGİZ, U. (2022). Production and characterization of heat retardant fiber-reinforced geopolymer plates. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 282–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/869185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aly, A. M., El-Feky, M. S., Kohail, M., & Nasr, E. S. A. (2019). Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber. Construction and Building Materials, 207, 136–144. [CrossRef] [2] Park, Y., Abolmaali, A., Kim, Y. H., & Ghahremannejad, M. (2016). Compressive strength of fly ashbased geopolymer concrete with crumb rubber partially replacing sand. Construction and Building Materials, 118, 43–51. [CrossRef] [3] Davidovits, J. (1994). Global warming impact on the cement and aggregates industries. World resource review, 6(2), 263–278. [4] Rashad, A. M., & Sadek, D. M. (2020). Behavior of alkali-activated slag pastes blended with waste rubber powder under the effect of freeze/thaw cycles and severe sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials, 265, Article 120716. [CrossRef] [5] Akbarnezhad, A., Huan, M., Mesgari, S., & Castel, A. (2015). Recycling of geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 152– 158. [CrossRef] [6] Qiu, J., Ruan, S., Unluer, C., & Yang, E. H. (2019). Autogenous healing of fiber-reinforced reactive magnesia-based tensile strain-hardening composites. Cement and Concrete Research, 115, 401–413. [CrossRef] [7] Teh, S. H., Wiedmann, T., Castel, A., & De Burgh, J. (2017). Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 312–320. [CrossRef] [8] Ruparathna, R., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2016). Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1032–1045. [CrossRef] [9] Rajendran, M., & Akasi, M. (2020). Performance of crumb rubber and nano fly ash based ferro-geopolymer panels under impact load. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(6), 1810–1820. [CrossRef] [10] Tchadjie, L. N., & Ekolu, S. O. (2018). Enhancing the reactivity of aluminosilicate materials toward geopolymer synthesis. Journal of Materials Science, 53(7), 4709–4733. [CrossRef] [11] Turner, L. K., & Collins, F. G. (2013). Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2 -e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 43(6), 125– 130. [CrossRef] [12] Prakasan, S., Palaniappan, S., & Gettu, R. (2020). Study of energy use and CO2 emissions in the manufacturing of clinker and cement. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 101(1), 221– 232. [CrossRef]