Journals / International Journal of Academic Research in Education / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Sampling techniques involving human subjects: Applications, pitfalls, and suggestions for further studies

Pages
74–83
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, population characteristics cannot be directly or indirectly estimated by using non-random sampling techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The most commonly used sampling techniques in systematic investigations are probability and nonprobability methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While probability sampling is based on the principle of a random selection of participants in a particular study, non-random selection is the basis of probability sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, population characteristics cannot be directly or indirectly estimated by using non-random sampling techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:True-random · quasi-random · non-random

Abstract

The most commonly used sampling techniques in systematic investigations are probability and nonprobability methods. While probability sampling is based on the principle of a random selection of participants in a particular study, non-random selection is the basis of probability sampling. The random and non-random classifications appear to have some potential flaws and are insufficient to represent all sampling procedures involving human participants. Similarly, most authors believe that they use random sampling techniques, although, in reality, they do not use true random sampling. Therefore, the objective of this article is to highlight that sampling techniques can be characterized as true-random, quasi-random, or nonrandom, rather than merely random and non-random. Attempts have been made to show how inadequate random and non-random sampling methods are, the characteristics of true-random, quasi-random, and nonrandom sampling procedures, and when each sampling procedure is appropriate. Since each unit of the population is randomly selected and the chance of selecting the unit is equal, a real random sample is used to estimate the characteristics of the population directly from the sample. With quasi-random sampling, it is not possible to directly estimate population characteristics, but only indirectly. However, population characteristics cannot be directly or indirectly estimated by using non-random sampling techniques.

🔖

Cite This Article

MULİSA, F. (2022). Sampling techniques involving human subjects: Applications, pitfalls, and suggestions for further studies. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 74–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/868561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adam, A. M. (2020). Sample size determination in survey research. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 26(5), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2020/v26i530263
  2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850
  3. Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2018). Research design and methods: A process approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  4. Cassady, R. (1945). Statistical sampling techniques and marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 9, 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224294500900401
  5. Chander, N. G. (2017). Sample size estimation. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 17(3), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_169_17
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775
  7. Delice, A. (2010). The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2001–2018. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919871.pdf
  8. Elfil, M., & Negida, A. (2017). Sampling methods in clinical research; An educational review. Emergency, 5(1), e52. https://doi.org/10.22037/emergency.v5i1.15215
  9. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Combination of probability random sampling method with non probability random sampling method (sampling versus sampling methods). Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00148
  10. Gill, S. L. (2020). Qualitative sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(4), 579–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420949218
  11. Israel, G. D. (2003). Determining sample size. https://www.tarleton.edu/academicassessment/documents/samplesize.pdf
  12. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Kadam, P., & Bhalerao, S. (2010). Sample size calculation