Journals / Environmental Research and Technology / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles

Pages
289–295
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In normal, sandy-lightweight and lightweight screeds, it was determined that as the cement dosage increased; the unit weights, flexural and compressive strengths, fire and abrasion resistance increased, water absorption capacity and the thermal conductivity coefficient decreased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, in order to observe the mechanical and physical properties of ordinary screed, sandy-lightweight screed and lightweight screed samples, expanded polystyrene (EPS) was used as fine aggregate and lightweight screed systems were produced by replacing sand at 100%, 50% and 0%.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Samples of cement dosages of 250, 300, 350 kg/m3 were produced for lightweight screeds, sandy-lightweight screeds and ordinary screeds.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In normal, sandy-lightweight and lightweight screeds, it was determined that as the cement dosage increased; the unit weights, flexural and compressive strengths, fire and abrasion resistance increased, water absorption capacity and the thermal conductivity coefficient decreased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EPS · light-weight screed · screed

Abstract

In this study, in order to observe the mechanical and physical properties of ordinary screed, sandy-lightweight screed and lightweight screed samples, expanded polystyrene (EPS) was used as fine aggregate and lightweight screed systems were produced by replacing sand at 100%, 50% and 0%. Samples of cement dosages of 250, 300, 350 kg/m3 were produced for lightweight screeds, sandy-lightweight screeds and ordinary screeds. Unit weight, water absorption capacity, flexural strength, compressive strength, fire resistance, abrasion and thermal conductivity tests were performed on the produced screed systems. As a result of the research, it was determined that as EPS ratio increases in screed system; unit weights decreased, water absorption rates increased. Besides, the flexural and compressive strengths, fire and abrasion resistance are also decreased. However, it was observed that the thermal conductivity coefficient reduced with the increment of EPS particles in the screed. In normal, sandy-lightweight and lightweight screeds, it was determined that as the cement dosage increased; the unit weights, flexural and compressive strengths, fire and abrasion resistance increased, water absorption capacity and the thermal conductivity coefficient decreased.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, F. M., YORULMAZ, H., ÖZUZUN, S., DURAK, U., İLKENTAPAR, S., KARAHAN, O., ATİŞ, C. (2022). Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles. Environmental Research and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 289–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/867906

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. A. Moreira, J. António, and A. Tadeu, “Lightweight screed containing cork granules: Mechanical and hygrothermal characterization,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 49, pp. 1–8, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.01.012. B. Chen and N. Liu, “A novel lightweight concrete-fabrication and its thermal and mechanical properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 44, pp. 691–698, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.091. A. Ben Fraj, M. Kismi, and P. Mounanga, “Valorization of coarse rigid polyurethane foam waste in lightweight aggregate concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1069–1077, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.010. C. Yang and R. Huang, “Approximate Strength of Lightweight Aggregate Using Micromechanics Method,” Adv Cem Based Mater, vol. 7, pp. 133–138, 1998.
  2. E. Yasar, C. D. Atis, A. Kilic, and H. Gulsen, “Strength properties of lightweight concrete made with basaltic pumice and fly ash,” Mater. Lett., vol. 57, no. 15, pp. 2267–2270, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00146-0. T. W. Bremner, “Environmental Aspects of Concrete: Problems and Solutions,” Proc. First Russ. Conf. Concr. Reinf. Concr. Probl., no. Moscow, Russia, pp. 232–246, 2001. R. Sri Ravindrarajah and A. J. Tuck, “Properties of hardened concrete containing treated expanded polystyrene beads,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 273–277, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0958-9465(94)90039-6.
  3. N. H. Ramli Sulong, S. A. S. Mustapa, and M. K. Abdul Rashid, “Application of expanded polystyrene (EPS) in buildings and constructions: A review,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 136, no. 20, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1002/app.47529. D. S. Babu, K. Ganesh Babu, and T. H. Wee, “Properties of lightweight expanded polystyrene aggregate concretes containing fly ash,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1218–1223, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.015. S. Doroudiani and H. Omidian, “Environmental, health and safety concerns of decorative mouldings made of expanded polystyrene in buildings,” Build. Environ., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 647–654, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.004. D. S. Babu, K. Ganesh Babu, and W. Tiong-Huan, “Effect of polystyrene aggregate size on strength and moisture migration characteristics of lightweight concrete,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 520–527, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.018. TS EN 1015-11,
  4. Mortar Testing Method, Part 11. Measurement of Compressive and Flexural Tensile Strength of Mortar. Ankara: TSE, 2000. TS 2824 EN 1338, Concrete paving blocks