Journals / Ahi Evran Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

An Infodemia Experience from the First Months of the Pandemic, Turkey

Pandeminin İlk Aylarından Bir İnfodemi Deneyimi, Türkiye

Pages
310–318
Publication Date
2022-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of ending COVID-19, the future predictions of the participants were more optimistic for Turkey than all over the world.Conclusion: There was the spread of false information among the participants, and this was not at the desired level, even among the healthcare workers

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects are still ongoing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study was aimed to determine the status of participants in Turkey regarding whether they believe the rumors about COVID-19 in the first months of the pandemic, obtain information about their implementation of the protection measures of the Ministry of Health, and identify their perceptions on ending the pandemic in Turkey and the World.Materials and Methods: A survey containing some questions about COVID-19 which designed as descriptive epidemiological research was applied to 694 individuals between the ages of 18 and 65, who lived in Turkey and actively used their social media accounts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of ending COVID-19, the future predictions of the participants were more optimistic for Turkey than all over the world.Conclusion: There was the spread of false information among the participants, and this was not at the desired level, even among the healthcare workers
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · Ölçüm · Yanlış Bilgi

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects are still ongoing. The present study was aimed to determine the status of participants in Turkey regarding whether they believe the rumors about COVID-19 in the first months of the pandemic, obtain information about their implementation of the protection measures of the Ministry of Health, and identify their perceptions on ending the pandemic in Turkey and the World.Materials and Methods: A survey containing some questions about COVID-19 which designed as descriptive epidemiological research was applied to 694 individuals between the ages of 18 and 65, who lived in Turkey and actively used their social media accounts. Descriptive statistics were used in summarizing the data, whereas chi-square analysis was used in the comparison of the groups. In statistical analysis, the significance value was accepted as p<0.05.Results: The lowest percentage of believing the misinformation on COVID-19 among the participants (38.4%) is "Regularly rinsing the mouth and nose with saline water prevents the new coronavirus disease". The percentage of the healthcare workers who believed the false information about COVID-19 was significantly lower (p=0.004, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) but not at the desired level. In terms of ending COVID-19, the future predictions of the participants were more optimistic for Turkey than all over the world.Conclusion: There was the spread of false information among the participants, and this was not at the desired level, even among the healthcare workers

Özet

Amaç: COVID-19 pandemisi ve etkileri hala devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de yaşayan katılımcıların COVID-19 hakkındaki söylentilere inanma durumlarını belirlemek, Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın korunma önlemlerini uygulamalarına ilişkin bilgi edinebilmek ve Türkiye’de ve dünyada salgının sonlanmasına ilişkin görüşlerini tespit etmek amaçlanmıştır.Araçlar ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı tipteki epidemiyolojik araştırmada, Türkiye’de yaşayan sosyal medya hesaplarını aktif olarak kullanan 18-65 yaş arası 694 kişiye COVID-19 ile ilgili bazı soruları içeren bir anket uygulanmıştır. Verilerin özetlenmesinde (frekans, yüzde ve ortalama gibi) tanımlayıcı istatistiklerden, grupların karşılaştırmasında ise ki-kare analizlerinden faydalanılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizlerde anlamlılık değeri p<0.05 olarak kabul edilmiştir.Bulgular: Katılımcılar arasında COVID-19 ile ilgili yanlış bilgiye inanma yüzdesinin (%38.4) en düşük olduğu ifade şudur: “Ağzı ve burnu düzenli olarak tuzlu su ile çalkalamak yeni koronavirüs hastalığını önler”. Sağlık çalışanlarında COVID-19 ile ilgili yanlış bilgiye inanma yüzdesi anlamlı derecede düşüktür (sırasıyla p=0.004, p<0.001 ve p<0.001), ancak istenilen düzeyde değildir. Katılımcıların COVID-19’un sonlanması hususunda, Türkiye hakkındaki gelecek öngörüleri Dünyaya göre daha iyimserdi.Sonuç: Çalışmaya katılanlar arasında yanlış bilgilerin yayılımı söz konusu olup bu durum sağlık çalışanları arasında dahi istenilen düzeyde değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, G., ÇALIŞKAN, C., ÖZCEBE, H. (2022). An Infodemia Experience from the First Months of the Pandemic, Turkey. Ahi Evran Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 310–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/866791

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157-160
  2. Droogers M, Ciotti M, Kreidl P, et al. European Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Planning: A Review of National Plans, July 2016. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019;13(3):582-592
  3. T.C.Health Ministry. Pandemi̇k İnfluenza Ulusal Hazirlik Plani.; 2019. https://www.grip.gov.tr/depo/ saglik-calisanlari/ulusal_pandemi_plani.pdf. Erişim tarihi 14 Nisan, 2020
  4. Moreno C, Wykes T, Galderisi S, et al. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pan-demic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 0366(20):1-6
  5. Ali I. COVID-19: Are We Ready for the Second Wave? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(5): 16-18
  6. T.C.Health Ministry. COVID-19 Yeni koronavirüs hastalığı. https://covid19bilgi.saglik.gov.tr/tr/. Access date April 14, 2020
  7. Trilla A, Trilla G, Daer C. The 1918 “Spanish Flu” in Spain. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(5):668-673
  8. World Health Organization. Infodemic. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infdemic#tab=tab _1. Access date July 27, 2021
  9. Halk Sağlığı Uzmanları Derneği. Infographics. https://korona.hasuder.org.tr/infografiler/. Access date 29 September, 2022 10. Pan SL, Cui M, Qian J. Information resource orchestration during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study of community lockdowns in China. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;54:102143
  10. Pan SL, Pan G, Leidner DE. Crisis response information networks. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;13(1):31-56
  11. Rahmi R, Joho H, Shirai T. An analysis of natural disaster-related information-seeking behavior using temporal stages. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2019;70(7):715-728
  12. Tim Y, Pan SL, Ractham P, Kaewkitipong L. Digitally enabled disaster response: the emergence of social media as boundary objects in a flooding disaster. Inf Syst J. 2017;27(2):197-232
  13. Muniz-Rodriguez K, Ofori SK, Bayliss LC, et al. Social Media Use in Emergency Response to Natural Disasters: A Systematic Review with a Public Health Perspective. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(1):139-149
  14. The Lancet. COVID-19: fighting panic with information. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):537
  15. Leung GM, Leung K. Crowdsourcing data to mitigate epidemics. Lancet Digit Heal. 2020;2(4):e156-e157
  16. Ramalingam S, Graham C, Dove J, Morrice L, Sheikh A. Hypertonic saline nasal irrigation and gargling should be considered as a treatment option for COVID-19. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):19-22
  17. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-