Journals / Koşuyolu Heart Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Prognostic Value of Logistic Clinical Syntax Score in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Double Stent Technique

Pages
240–249
Publication Date
2022-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: MACE developed in 33.9% of patients with high Log CSS and 8.5% of patients with low Log CSS (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the preprocedural logistic clinical SYNTAX score (Log CSS) and major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with true bifurcation lesions who underwent revascularization with the double stent strategy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: A total of 233 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients who underwent revascularization with a double stent strategy were retrospectively included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: MACE developed in 33.9% of patients with high Log CSS and 8.5% of patients with low Log CSS (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Atherosclerosis · percutaneous coronary intervention · percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the preprocedural logistic clinical SYNTAX score (Log CSS) and major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with true bifurcation lesions who underwent revascularization with the double stent strategy. Patients and Methods: A total of 233 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients who underwent revascularization with a double stent strategy were retrospectively included in the study. Anatomical SYNTAX score (SS) and log CSS were calculated. The patients were divided into two groups according to the cut-off value determined by ROC analysis. The prediction of two-year MACE with Log CSS was evaluated. Results: MACE developed in 33.9% of patients with high Log CSS and 8.5% of patients with low Log CSS (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, G., ASLAN, S., DEMİR, A. R., UYGUR, B., IŞIK, A., ARSLAN, E., ERTÜRK, M. (2022). Prognostic Value of Logistic Clinical Syntax Score in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Double Stent Technique. Koşuyolu Heart Journal, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 240–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/866278

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blöstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012
  2. 33(20):2569-619. [Crossref] 2. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Morice MC. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease. Heart 2004
  3. 90(6):713-22. [Crossref] 3. Bennett J, Dubois C. Coronary bifurcation lesions: Is less more. J Thorac Dis 2016
  4. 8(10):1351-4. [Crossref] 4. Meier B, Gruentzig AR, King SB, Douglas Jr JS, Hollman J, Ischinger T, et al. Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1984
  5. 53(1):10-4. [Crossref] 5. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009
  6. 360(10):961-72. [Crossref] 6. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: An angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005
  7. 1(2):219-27. 7. Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014
  8. 46(4):517-92. 8. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA, Masoudi FA, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012
  9. 143(4):780-803. [Crossref] 9. Sinning JM, Stoffel V, Grube E, et al. Combination of angiographic and clinical characteristics for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing unprotected left main coronary artery stenting. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jun
  10. 101(6):477-85. [Crossref] 10. Garg S, Sarno G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Girasis C, Wykrzykowska J, Dawkins KD