Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2020 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

Identification and Evaluation of the Ways of Meeting Patients' Expectations from a Hospital: An AHP-Weighted QFD Case Study In A Pediatric Hospital

Pages
224–247
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that, from the children’s point of view, accommodation services was found as the most important factor and arrangement of the patient rooms as the most important sub-factor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the expectations of pediatric patients from a hospital and find out feasible solutions to address these expectations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with this purpose, an AHP-weighted QFD case study was carried out in a pediatric hospital in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that, from the children’s point of view, accommodation services was found as the most important factor and arrangement of the patient rooms as the most important sub-factor.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Analytic hierarchy process · quality function deployment · pediatric hospital

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the expectations of pediatric patients from a hospital and find out feasible solutions to address these expectations. In accordance with this purpose, an AHP-weighted QFD case study was carried out in a pediatric hospital in Turkey. In order to determine the expectations of pediatric patients; face-to-face and semi-structured interviews were used and the natural environment of the hospital was observed in many different times. Expectations of the children constituted the left part of the House of Quality (HoQ) of QFD and were weighted using the AHP. Then, technical requirements offering solutions to expectations of children were defined, other parts of the house were added and the whole HoQ was completed. The results show that, from the children’s point of view, accommodation services was found as the most important factor and arrangement of the patient rooms as the most important sub-factor. All remaining factors and sub-factors were also evaluated and prioritized. It is hoped that this study can contribute to the related literature and the QFD model developed in the study can be taken as an example by similar and/or different hospitals. Finally, the limitations of this study and future research directions are outlined.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, N. Ö., AKBAL, H. (2020). Identification and Evaluation of the Ways of Meeting Patients' Expectations from a Hospital: An AHP-Weighted QFD Case Study In A Pediatric Hospital. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 224–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/86615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahmed, M., Islam, R., & Al-wahaibi, S. K. (2006). Developing quality healthcare software using quality function deployment: a case study based on Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 1(4), 408-425.
  2. Aktepe, A., Ersöz, S., Hayat, Y., Orhan, G., Can, C., & Çiftçi, S. (2011). Integrated use of servqual analysis and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) in quality function deployment (QFD): an application ın a university hospital. XI. Production Research Symposium, 23-24 Haziran 2011. 237-246.
  3. Ardıç, K., Çevik, O., & Göktaş, Ş. (2008). Quality function deployment: an application at GOP University. Academic Reviews, 3(2), 112-139.
  4. Antmen, ZF., & Minç, P. (2018). Çocuk yoğun bakım ünitesinde çok kriterli karar verme ile mekanik ventilatör seçimi ve bir uygulama örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 17-30.
  5. Ariani, N. N., Napiyani, N. M., & Wijaya, I. P. (2017). Implementatıon of qualıty functıon deployment to identify priority needs of customers and health providers of child-friendly community health centre. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive, 5(1), 12-17. Bang W., & Chang B. Y. (2013). Quality factor analysis of metalworking process with AHP, International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5741-5756.
  6. Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L. (2002). Quality function deployment: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 463–497.
  7. Chang, H., & Kim, D. (2010). A quality function deployment framework for the service quality of health information websites. Healthcare Research Information, 16(1), 6-14.
  8. Chang Y., Yang Y., & Dong S. (2018). Comprehensive sustainability evaluation of high-speed railway (HSR) construction projects based on unascertained measure and analytic hierarchy process. Sustainability, 10(2), 1-19.
  9. Chen C.W., Huang S. H. (2011). Implementing KM programmes using fuzzy QFD, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2(4), 387-406.
  10. Chiou, C. C., & Cheng, Y. S. (2008). An integrated method of kano model and qfd for designing impressive qualities of healthcare service. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 590-594.
  11. Chou, S. (2004). Evaluating the service quality of undergraduate nursing education in taiwan – using quality function deployment. Nurse Education Today, 24(4), 310–318.
  12. Chou, Y. C., Tsai, P. C., Pai, J. Y., Yen, H. Y., & Lu, C. H. (2014). Application of Kano’s two-dimens