SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

An Experimental Study on Unit Side Resistance of Gaziantep Limestone

Volkan KALPAKCI
İslam TABUR
Pages
11051–11068
Publication Date
2021-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, a linear correlation and non-linear correlation ranges for estimating the unit side resistance of such limestones were also suggested.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the correlation between the uniaxial compressive strength and unit side resistance of Gaziantep limestone was investigated experimentally for dry and fully saturated conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The linear correlations significantly overestimated the measured side resistance values for all tests while the non-linear methods generally overestimated the unit side resistance under fully saturated conditions but provided a reasonable estimation for dry samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, a linear correlation and non-linear correlation ranges for estimating the unit side resistance of such limestones were also suggested.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:limestone · side resistance · rock

Abstract

In this study, the correlation between the uniaxial compressive strength and unit side resistance of Gaziantep limestone was investigated experimentally for dry and fully saturated conditions. The results were compared with the methods given in the literature which correlate these two parameters. The linear correlations significantly overestimated the measured side resistance values for all tests while the non-linear methods generally overestimated the unit side resistance under fully saturated conditions but provided a reasonable estimation for dry samples. As a result, a linear correlation and non-linear correlation ranges for estimating the unit side resistance of such limestones were also suggested.

Özet

In this study, the correlation between the uniaxial compressive strength and unit side resistance of Gaziantep limestone was investigated experimentally for dry and fully saturated conditions. The results were compared with the methods given in the literature which correlate these two parameters. The linear correlations significantly overestimated the measured side resistance values for all tests while the non-linear methods generally overestimated the unit side resistance under fully saturated conditions but provided a reasonable estimation for dry samples. As a result, a linear correlation and non-linear correlation ranges for estimating the unit side resistance of such limestones were also suggested.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALPAKCI, V., TABUR, İ. (2021). An Experimental Study on Unit Side Resistance of Gaziantep Limestone. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 11051–11068. https://ajindex.com/articles/864176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kaderabek, T.J., Reynolds, R.T., Miami limestone foundation design and construction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 107, 1981
  2. Gupton, C., Logan, T., Design guidelines for drilled shafts in weak rocks of south Florida. South Florida Annual ASCE Meeting, Florida, 1984
  3. Reese, L.C., O’Neill, M.W., Drilled shafts: Construction and design. FHWA, Publication No. HI-88, 42, 1988
  4. Toh, C.T., Ooi, T.A., Chiu, H.K., Chee, S.K., Ting, W.H., Design parameters for bored piles in a weathered sedimentary formation. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Engng 2, Rio de Janeiro, 1989
  5. Rosenberg, P., Journeaux, N.L., Friction and end bearing tests on bedrock for high capacity socket design. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 13(3), 324-333, 1976
  6. Meigh, A.C., Wolski, W., Design parameters for weak rocks. 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, 1969
  7. Horvath, R.G., Kenney, T.C., Shaft resistance of rock-socketed drilled piers. Symposium on Deep Foundations, Atlanta, 1979
  8. Horvath, R.G., Kenney. T.C., Kozicki, P., Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 20(4), 758-772, 1983
  9. Rowe, R.K., Armitage, H.H., The design of piles socketed into weak rock. University of Western Ontario Faculty of Engineering Science, 1984
  10. Carter, J.P., Kulhawy, F.H., Analysis and design of drilled shaft foundations socketed into rock (No. EPRI-EL-5918). Electric Power Research Inst., Palo Alto, CA (USA); Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (USA). Geotechnical Engineering Group, 1988
  11. Kulhawy, F.H., Phoon, K.K., Drilled shaft side resistance in clay soil to rock. Design and performance of deep foundations: Piles and piers in soil and soft rock, Texas, 1993
  12. Rezazadeh, S., Eslami, A., Empirical methods for determining shaft bearing capacity of semi-deep foundations socketed in rocks. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(6), 1140-1151, 2017
  13. Rowe, R.K., Armitage, H.H., A design method for drilled piers in soft rock. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 24(1), 126-142, 1987
  14. O’Neill, M.W., Reese, L.C., Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design. Report FHWA-IF-99-025, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, 1999
  15. Akgüner, C., Kirkit, M., Kayaya Soketli Kazıkların Yükleme Deneyi ve Ampirik Yöntemlerle Belirlenen Kapasitelerinin Karşılaştırılması. Teknik Dergi, 22(109), 5713-5723, 2011
  16. Marangoz, L., Co