Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7

Comparison of quality characteristics of muffins produced with einkorn, whole grain and white wheat flours

Siyez, tam buğday ve beyaz buğday unları ile üretilen muffin keklerin kalite karakteristiklerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
1051–1061
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the C formulation received the highest scores for all sensory characteristics, the odor, flavor, and overall acceptability scores of all muffins were statistically (p>0.05) similar.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the chemical, physical and sensory properties of muffin cakes produced with 100% white wheat flour (WWF), 100% whole grain einkorn flour (EF), a 50/50 blend of whole grain einkorn flour/whole grain wheat flour (E-WGWF), and 100% whole grain wheat flour (WGWF) were determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total and insoluble dietary fiber content, Ca, K, P, Mg and Mn content, total antioxidant activity values and total phenolic content of the muffins were increased by using EF and WGWF instead of white wheat flour.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the C formulation received the highest scores for all sensory characteristics, the odor, flavor, and overall acceptability scores of all muffins were statistically (p>0.05) similar.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Siyez · beyaz ve tam tahıllı buğday unları · Muffin

Abstract

In this study, the chemical, physical and sensory properties of muffin cakes produced with 100% white wheat flour (WWF), 100% whole grain einkorn flour (EF), a 50/50 blend of whole grain einkorn flour/whole grain wheat flour (E-WGWF), and 100% whole grain wheat flour (WGWF) were determined. The total and insoluble dietary fiber content, Ca, K, P, Mg and Mn content, total antioxidant activity values and total phenolic content of the muffins were increased by using EF and WGWF instead of white wheat flour. The muffins produced with EF had the highest protein content; the crumb color of the control muffin (C) was the lightest and yellowest, while the crumb color of the muffin produced with 100% WGWF (WGM) was the darkest and reddest. Volume index values, specific volumes, symmetry indexes and uniformity indexes of all muffins were similar. Muffins having 100% einkorn flour (EM) had the highest chewiness, gumminess, and hardness values. According to SEM micrographs, the WGM, EM and muffins produced with E-WGWF (E-WGM) had larger sized pores due to the higher amount of dietary fiber. While the C formulation received the highest scores for all sensory characteristics, the odor, flavor, and overall acceptability scores of all muffins were statistically (p>0.05) similar.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, %100 beyaz buğday unu (WWF), %100 tam tahıllı siyez unu (EF), 50/50 tam tahıllı siyez unu/tam tahıllı buğday unu (EWGWF) ve %100 tam tahıllı buğday unu (WGWF) ile üretilen muffin keklerinin kimyasal, fiziksel ve duyusal özellikleri incelenmiştir. Beyaz buğday unu yerine EF ve WGWF unu kullanılmasıyla muffinlerin toplam ve çözünmeyen diyet lifi, Ca, K, P, Mg, Mn miktarları, toplam antioksidan aktivite değerleri ile toplam fenolik madde içeriklerinin arttığı tespit edilmiştir. EF ile üretilen keklerin en yüksek protein içeriğine sahip olduğu; kontrol kekin (C) iç rengi en açık ve en sarı iken, %100 WGWF (WGM) ile üretilen kekin iç renginin en koyu ve en kırmızı olduğu saptanmıştır. Tüm keklerin hacim indeks değerleri, spesifik hacimleri, simetri ve tekdüzelik indeksleri benzer bulunmuştur. %100 siyez unu (EM) içeren keklerin en yüksek çiğnenebilirlik yapışkanlık ve sertlik değerlerine sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. SEM mikrograflarında;, EM, WGM ve E-WGWF ile üretilen (E-WGM) keklerin, daha yüksek miktarda diyet lifi nedeniyle daha büyük boyutlu gözeneklerine sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Duyusal değerlendirmede, en yüksek puanları C örneği almış olsa da koku, tat ve genel kabul edilebilirlik bakımından tüm kekler istatistiksel olarak benzer (p>0.05) bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

ISIK, F., OZGOREN, E., SOLA, Y. (2022). Comparison of quality characteristics of muffins produced with einkorn, whole grain and white wheat flours. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7, 1051–1061. https://ajindex.com/articles/862550

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Løje H, Møller B, Laustsen AM, Hansen Å. “Chemical composition, functional properties and sensory profilling of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.)”. Journal of Cereal Science, 37, 231-240, 2003
  2. Zaharieva M, Monneveux P. “Cultivated einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum L. subsp. monococcum): the long life of a founder crop of agriculture”. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61, 677-706, 2014
  3. Hidalgo A, Brandolini A. “Nitrogen fertilization effects on technological parameters and carotenoid, tocol and phenolic acid content of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. subsp. monococcum): A two-year evaluation”. Journal of Cereal Science, 73,18-24, 2017
  4. Hendek Ertop M, Atasoy R. “Comparison of physicochemical attributes of einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) and durum wheat (Triticum durum) and evaluation of morohological properties using scanning electron microscopy and image analysis”. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 25, 93-99, 2019
  5. Biel W, Jaroszewska A, Stankowski S, Sobolewska M, Kepinska-Pacelik J. “Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains”. European Food Research and Technology, 247, 1525-1538, 2021 [6] Turhan Ş, Kurnaz A. “Analysis of macro- and microminerals content in the einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) samples cultuvated in Kastamonu, Turkey”. Turkish Journal of Agriculture- Food Science and Technology, 9(8), 1436-1442, 2021
  6. Kızılaslan Y. Siyez Unu ile Üretilen Bebe Bisküvilerinde Protein ve Karbonhidrat Sindirilebilirliğinin İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans. Tezi İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2020
  7. Kissing-Kucek L, Veenstra LD, Amnuaycheeva P, Sorrells ME. “A grounded guide to gluten: How modern genotypes and processing impact wheat sensitivity”. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 14, 285-302, 2015
  8. Yilmaz VA, Koca AF. “Quality, sensorial and textural properties of einkorn and durum bulgur produced with several methods”. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 22, 1-9, 2020
  9. Hidalgo A, Brandolini A. Nutritional, Technological, and health aspects of einkorn flour and bread. Editors: Preedy VR, Watson RR, Patel VB. Flour and Breads and Their Fortification in Health and Disease Prevention, 99-110, New York, USA, Elsevier Inc. Academic Press, 2019
  10. Agnello PD, Landriscina L, Schiavulli A, Lamacchia C. “Polymeric proteins formation during pasta-making with einkorn (Triticum monococcum) and semolina mixtures