Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

A Review on Geological View of Svalbard with its Infrastructure and Strategies

Pages
24–34
Publication Date
2022-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, projects that can be done within the scope of scientific researches of Turkey in AR, are evaluated as a recommendation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Arctic Region (AR); Its role in global climate change, recently opened commercial sea routes, unexploited industrial resources, unique polar ecosystem and international geopolitical balance making it a strategic area that attracts the attention of many countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with the geological significance of Svalbard, many institutions are engaged in educational studies, science strategies, international projects, etc.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, projects that can be done within the scope of scientific researches of Turkey in AR, are evaluated as a recommendation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Arctic · Svalbard · Geology

Abstract

Arctic Region (AR); Its role in global climate change, recently opened commercial sea routes, unexploited industrial resources, unique polar ecosystem and international geopolitical balance making it a strategic area that attracts the attention of many countries. In this aspect, the Arctic Council carries out various studies and international cooperation, especially interdisciplinary scientific research in the AR. Apart from the Council, many institutions, organizations and societies come to the AR to conduct scientific studies. When these studies examined from a geological point of view, it seen that they classified as glacial science, marine geology, geomorphology, microbial ecology, permafrost, biogeochemistry and geochemistry. Svalbard is geologically salient as well as being the place where most scientific studies are conducting in AR. In line with the geological significance of Svalbard, many institutions are engaged in educational studies, science strategies, international projects, etc. In this study, the geological structure, geological infrastructure and scientific strategy for geological researches of the Svalbard Region are examined. Moreover, projects that can be done within the scope of scientific researches of Turkey in AR, are evaluated as a recommendation.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINKAYA, Ş., YİRMİBEŞOĞLU, S., BALCI, N. Ç., OZSOY, B. (2022). A Review on Geological View of Svalbard with its Infrastructure and Strategies. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 24–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/859996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Allaart, L., Müller, J., Schomacker, A., Rydningen, T. A., Håkansson, L., Kjellman, S. E.,. & Forwick, M. (2020). Late Quaternary glacier and sea‐ice history of northern Wijdefjorden, Svalbard. Boreas, 49(3), 417-437. Arctic Council / Working groups, Retrieved 17 August 2021 from: https://arctic-council.org/search/?q=geology&submit= Arctic Council Strategic Plan 2021-2030, (2021). Retrieved 2021 from https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/2601
  2. Arctic Council, Retrieved 17 August 2021 from https://arctic-council.org/ Arctic Office. Retrieved 12 July 2021 from https://www.arctic.ac.uk/uk-arctic-research-station/
  3. Bednorz, E., & Kolendowicz, L. (2010). Summer 2009 thermal and bioclimatic conditions in Ebba Valley, central Spitsbergen. Polish Polar Research, 327-348. Bp, (2021). Statistical Review of World Energy Retrieved 2021 from https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
  4. Bryhn, R. (2016). "Kings Bay AS". https://snl.no/Kings_Bay_AS Burzyński, M., Michalski, K., Manby, G., & Nejbert, K. (2018). Mineralogical, rock-magnetic and palaeomagnetic properties of metadolerites from Central Western Svalbard. Minerals, 8(7), 279. Canturk, I.U., Atvur, S. (2021). “Environmental Degradation, Strategy and Competition in the Arctic Region: An Evaluation in the Context of Environmental Security”. International Journal of Politics and Security (IJPS), 3 (1), 180-217.
  5. Centre for Polar Ecology (2013). Polar Ecology Course Svalbard 2013,
  6. Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Choudhary S, Nayak GN, Khare N. (2020). Source, mobility, and bioavailability of metals in fjord sediments of Krossfjord-Kongsfjord system, Arctic, Svalbard. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May; 27(13):15130-15148.
  7. Cianfarra, P., & Salvini, F. (2013). Evidences for Neogene-Quaternary tectonics in Svalbard. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (pp. EGU2013-10471). Cianfarra, P., & Salvini, F. (2016). Quantification of fracturing within fault damage zones affecting Late Proterozoic carbonates in Svalbard. Rendiconti Lincei, 27(1), 229-241.
  8. Calik, A.G. (2021). “Current Issues and Bilateral Disputes in the Arctic Region”. International Journal of Politics and Security (IJPS), 3(1), 99-128.
  9. Cetin, O., & Buyuksagnak, Y. B. (2021). Turkey's Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 8(3)