Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Creation of a Virtual Tour .Exe Utilizing Very High-Resolution RGB UAV Data

Pages
151–160
Publication Date
2022-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, a first-person player was implemented for a realistic VR experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last decades, developments in game engine technology led to a raised attraction to the virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) concepts which offer users an interactive synthetic environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, with the travel limitations of the current COVID-19 pandemic, VR tour applications that visualize the geospatial data gained popularity more than ever.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, a first-person player was implemented for a realistic VR experience.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:UAV · SFM · 3D Textured Mesh Model

Abstract

In the last decades, developments in game engine technology led to a raised attraction to the virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) concepts which offer users an interactive synthetic environment. Also, with the travel limitations of the current COVID-19 pandemic, VR tour applications that visualize the geospatial data gained popularity more than ever. In this study, a three-dimensional (3D) VR tour application was created for Gebze Technical University (GTU) Campus by integrating unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data into an artificial environment by using cross-platform game development engine Unity. For creating high-quality 3D models of the Campus, different imaging geometries and flight altitudes were applied. The aerial photos were achieved with a ground sampling distance (GSD) of ≤2.2 cm with a 20 megapixel (MP) Sony Exmor RGB camera. Point cloud processing and the generation of high-quality 3D products were carried out by structure from motion (SfM) based photogrammetric software Agisoft Metashape. Using 86 well-distributed ground control points (GCPs), geometric correction accuracy of ±2 cm (~0.9 pixels) was reached as root mean square error (RMSE). Generated 3D models were imported into the Unity environment and the negative influence of high polygon data on the application performance was reduced by applying occlusion culling and space subdivision rendering optimization algorithms. The visual potential of the VR was improved by adding 3D individual object models such as trees, benches and arbors. For enhancing the information content of the VR tour, interactive information panels including the building metadata such as building name, block name and total floor area were placed. Finally, a first-person player was implemented for a realistic VR experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEFERCİK, U. G., KAVZOĞLU, T., NAZAR, M., ATALAY, C., MADAK, M. (2022). Creation of a Virtual Tour .Exe Utilizing Very High-Resolution RGB UAV Data. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 151–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/859988

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Achille, C., Adami, A., Chiarini, S., Cremonesi, S., Fassi, F., Fregonese, L., Taffurelli, L. (2015). UAV-based photogrammetry and integrated technologies for architectural applications—methodological strategies for the after-quake survey of vertical structures in Mantua (Italy). Sensors, 15(7), 15520-15539.
  2. Annis, A., Nardi, F., Petroselli, A., Apollonio, C., Arcangeletti, E., Tauro, F.,. Grimaldi, S. (2020). UAV-DEMs for small-scale flood hazard mapping. Water, 12(6), 1717. Bekele, M. K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E. S., Gain, J. (2018). A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 11(2), 1-36.
  3. Bendig, J., Willkomm, M., Tilly, N., Gnyp, M. L., Bennertz, S., Qiang, C.,. Bareth, G. (2013). Very high-resolution crop surface models (CSMs) from UAV-based stereo images for rice growth monitoring in Northeast China. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., 40, 45-50.
  4. Brooks, F. P. (1999). What's real about virtual reality?. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(6), 16-27.
  5. Bruno, F., Barbieri, L., Lagudi, A., Cozza, M., Cozza, A., Peluso, R., Muzzupappa, M. (2018). Virtual dives into the underwater archaeological treasures of South Italy. Virtual Reality, 22(2), 91-102.
  6. Bruno, F., Bruno, S., De Sensi, G., Luchi, M. L., Mancuso, S., Muzzupappa, M. (2010). From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(1), 42-49.
  7. Campana, S. (2017). Drones in archaeology. State‐of‐the‐art and future perspectives. Archaeological Prospection, 24(4), 275-296.
  8. Carl, E., Stein, A. T., Levihn-Coon, A., Pogue, J. R., Rothbaum, B., Emmelkamp, P.,. Powers, M. B. (2019). Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 61, 27-36.
  9. Carrozzino, M., Bergamasco, M. (2010). Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(4), 452-458.
  10. Coorg, S., Teller, S. (1997). Real-time occlusion culling for models with large occluders. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Providence RI, USA, 83-90.
  11. Duan, H., Li, J., Fan, S., Lin, Z., Wu, X., Cai, W. (2021). Metaverse for social good: A university campus prototype. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 153-161.
  12. Eisenbeiss, H., Zhang, L. (2006).