The results show that the deep-seated magnetic bodies (at least 5 km deep) are possibly emplaced in the upper crust along the NE-SW trending faults.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Çameli basin is situated at the southwestern Anatolia (Turkey), where is tectonically a very active region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results show that the deep-seated magnetic bodies (at least 5 km deep) are possibly emplaced in the upper crust along the NE-SW trending faults.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The AS map indicates that many of the causative sources appear elliptical shaped in the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:The Çameli Basin · Magnetic Anomaly · the Reduction to Pole (RTP)
Abstract
The Çameli basin is situated at the southwestern Anatolia (Turkey), where is tectonically a very active region. The reduction to the pole (RTP), the upward continuation and the analytic signal (AS) methods were used in this study to determine the tectonic lineaments/bodies caused magnetic anomaly beneath the Çameli basin. The results show that the deep-seated magnetic bodies (at least 5 km deep) are possibly emplaced in the upper crust along the NE-SW trending faults. The AS map indicates that many of the causative sources appear elliptical shaped in the study.
AKAR, F., BİLİM, F. (2022). Determination of crustal structure beneath the Çameli Basin (SW Turkey) using an aeromagnetic data. Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 31–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/859098
S. Över, S. Özden, A. Pınar, H. Yılmaz, Z. Kamacı, U.C. Ünlügenç, “Late Cenozoic stres state distributions at the intersection of the Hellenic and Cyprus arcs, SW Turkey,” J. Asian Earth Sci., vol. 132, pp. 94-102, Dec. 2016, doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.10.003
A.M.C. Şengör, “The North Anatolian transform fault:its age, ofset and tectonic significance,” J. Geol. Soc., vol. 136, pp. 269-282, June 1979, doi:10.1144/gsjgs.136.3.0269
J.F. Dewey, A.M.C. Şengör, “Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multiplate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone,” Geo. Soc. Amer. Bull., vol. 90, pp. 84-92, 1979, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1979)90 2.0.CO;2
A.M.C. Şengör and Y. Yılmaz, “Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach,” Tectonophysics vol. 75, pp. 181-241, June 1981, doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(81)90275-4
X. Le Pichon and J. Angelier, “ The Hellenic arc and trench systems: a key to the neotectonic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean area,” Tectonophysics vol. 60, pp. 1-42, Nov. 1979, doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(79)90131-8
J.F. Dewey, “Extensional collapse of orogens,” Tectonics vol. 7, pp. 1123-1139, Dec. 1988, doi:10.1029/TC007i006p01123
G. Seyioğlu and B.C. Scott, “Late Cenozoic crustal extension and basin formation in west Turkey,” Geol. Mag., vol. 128, pp. 155-216, Mar 1991, doi: 10.1017/S0016756800018343
A. Barka, “The North Anatolian fault zone,” Ann. Tecton. vol. 6, pp. 164-195, 1992
S. Över, S. Özden, A. Pınar, H. Yılmaz, U.C. Ünlügenç, Z. Kamacı, “Late Cenozoic stres field in the Çameli Basin, SW Turkey,” Tectonophysics vol. 492, pp. 60-72, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.04.037
J.H. ten Veen, S.J. Boulton, M.C. Alçiçek, “From palaeotectonics to neotectonics in the Neotethys realm: The importance of kinematic decoupling and inherited structural grain in SW Anatolia (Turkey),” Tectonophysics vol. 473, pp. 261-281, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.09.030
M.C. Alçiçek, N. Kazancı, M. Özkul, “Multiple rifting pulses and sedimentation pattern in the Çameli Basin, southwestern Anatolia, Turkey,” J. Sed. Geo., vol, 173, pp. 409-431, Jan. 2005, doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2003.12.012
R.Oberhansli, J. Partzsch, O. Candan, “First occurrence of Fe-Mg-carpholite documenting a high-pressure metamorphism in metasediments of the Lycian Nappes, SW Turkey,” In. J. Earth Sci., vol. 89, pp. 867-873, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s005310000103
A. Ates, P. Kearey, S. Tufan, “New Gravity and Magnetic Maps of Turkey