Journals / Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 39-1

Unveiling Teachers’ Personal Responses to Innovation

Öğretmenlerin Yeniliğe Yönelik Kişisel Yaklaşımlarını Ortaya Çıkarmak

Pages
219–242
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A corpus-based discourse analysis of teachers’ language unveiled their positioning in terms of both their agency and their sense-making in a process of change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:When awareness of the current plurality of English and of its implications for teaching is raised in teacher education courses, this perspective will afterwards emerge in teachers’ classrooms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Teachers’ ELF awareness was enhanced in the ENRICH course through reflective activities and in the forum where teachers shared personal views and beliefs about language learning and teaching within an ELF aware approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A corpus-based discourse analysis of teachers’ language unveiled their positioning in terms of both their agency and their sense-making in a process of change.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ODİ- farkındalığı · söylem analizi · derlem-tabanlı

Abstract

When awareness of the current plurality of English and of its implications for teaching is raised in teacher education courses, this perspective will afterwards emerge in teachers’ classrooms. Teachers’ ELF awareness was enhanced in the ENRICH course through reflective activities and in the forum where teachers shared personal views and beliefs about language learning and teaching within an ELF aware approach. In order to investigate the changes occurring during the course, a specific lens was used to analyze a group of participant teachers’ shift in perspective through their interventions when responding to reflective activities. A corpus-based discourse analysis of teachers’ language unveiled their positioning in terms of both their agency and their sense-making in a process of change.

Özet

Öğretmen eğitimi derslerinde, İngilizcenin mevcut çeşitliliği ve bunun öğretim üzerindeki etkileri konusunda farkındalık oluşturulduğunda, bu bakış açısı daha sonra öğretmenlerin sınıflarında görülecektir. ENRICH eğitiminde düşündürücü etkinliklerle ve öğretmenlerin ortak dil olarak İngilizce (ODİ) farkındalığına sahip bir yaklaşım içinde dil öğrenimi ve öğretimi hakkında kişisel görüş ve inançlarını paylaştığı forumda, öğretmenlerin ODİ farkındalığı artıldı. Eğitim sırasında meydana gelen değişiklikleri araştırmak için, bir grup katılımcı öğretmenin düşündürücü etkinliklere yanıt verirkenki müdahaleleri yoluyla bakış açılarındaki değişimi analiz etmek için belirli bir mercek kullanıldı. Öğretmenlerin diline ilişkin derlem temelli bir söylem analizi, öğretmenlerin değişim sürecinde hem faillik hem de anlam çıkarımı açısından konumlanmalarını ortaya çıkardı.

🔖

Cite This Article

LOPRİORE, L., CANNELLİ, A., FİASCO, V., SPERTİ, S. (2022). Unveiling Teachers’ Personal Responses to Innovation. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 39-1, 219–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/858239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers' stated beliefs and practices. System. 40(2), 282-295.
  2. Bayyurt, Y. & Dewey, M. (2020). Locating ELF in ELT. ELT Journal, 74(4), 369-376.
  3. Bayyurt, Y. & Sifakis, N. (2015). ELF-Aware In-Service teacher education: A transformative perspective. In H. Bowles & A. Cogo (Eds.), International perspectives on English as a lingua franca (pp.117-135).
  4. Palgrave McMillan. Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243-257.
  5. Birello, M. (2012). Teacher cognition and language teacher education: Beliefs and practice. A conversation with Simon Borg. Ballaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 5(2), 88-94.
  6. Bolasco, S. (2013). L’analisi automatica dei testi. Fare ricerca con il text mining. Roma: Carocci. de Haan, P. (2011). The optimum corpus sample size?. In G. Leitner (ed.), New directions in English language corpora. De Gruyter Mouton (pp. 3-20). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110878202.3
  7. Dewey, M. & Pineda, I. (2020). ELF and Teacher Education: Attitudes and beliefs. ELT Journal, 74(4), 428–441.
  8. Flowerdew, L. (2012) Corpus-based discourse analysis. In J.P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp.174-187).
  9. Routledge. Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Freeman, D. & K. Johnson (1998). Re-conceptualising the Knowledge Base of Language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 397-411.
  11. Gimenez, T., El Kadri, M. S., & Calvo, L. C. S. (Eds.). (2017). English as a lingua franca in teacher education: A Brazilian perspective (Vol. 10). de Gruyter Mouton Graddol, D. (2006). English next (Vol. 62). Milton Keynes: British Council. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold. Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a Lingua Franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281-315.
  12. Keteelar, E. (2012) Teachers and innovations: on the role of ownership, sense-making, and agency. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Llurda, E. (2004) NNS teachers and English as an International language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 314-323.
  13. Llurda, E. (2018). English language teachers and ELF. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker and M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp. 518-527).
  14. Routledge. Llurda, E. & Mocanu, V. (2018). Changing te