Journals / Bilgi Yönetimi / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Organizational Learning Capacity, Ambidexterity, Environmental Dynamism and Innovation Performance

Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi

Pages
239–255
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The generalization of the research results will be increased by including factors such as competitive environment and market fluctuations in the expanded data set to be obtained with the participation of businesses in different sectors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine how the organizational learning capacities of businesses operating in the information technology (IT) sector will affect the innovations and environmental dynamism of an enterprise in the future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study examines the effect of ambidexterity on organizational learning capacity, as well as the effect of environmental dynamism on the innovation performance of businesses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The generalization of the research results will be increased by including factors such as competitive environment and market fluctuations in the expanded data set to be obtained with the participation of businesses in different sectors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi · Keşifsel Yenilik · Düzeltici Yenilik

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the organizational learning capacities of businesses operating in the information technology (IT) sector will affect the innovations and environmental dynamism of an enterprise in the future. The study examines the effect of ambidexterity on organizational learning capacity, as well as the effect of environmental dynamism on the innovation performance of businesses. In order to measure the relationships in the research model developed in this direction, the data obtained from 311 middle and senior managers working in the IT sector were analyzed through Smart PLS 2.0 and SPSS programs. Factor analysis and correlation analysis were used in the analysis of the data. All of the research hypotheses tested using the structural equation model were accepted. The generalization of the research results will be increased by including factors such as competitive environment and market fluctuations in the expanded data set to be obtained with the participation of businesses in different sectors.

Özet

Bu çalışma bilgi teknolojileri (BT) sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin örgütsel öğrenme kapasitelerinin, gelecek dönemlerde işletmede yapılacak yenilikleri ve çevresel dinamizmi nasıl etkileyeceğini tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada çift yetenekliliğin örgütsel öğrenme kapasitesi üzerindeki etkisinin yanı sıra çevresel dinamizmin işletmelerin yenilik yapma performansını nasıl etkilediği incelenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda geliştirilen araştırma modelindeki ilişkileri ölçmek amacı ile BT sektöründe çalışan 311 orta ve üst düzey yöneticiden elde edilen veriler Smart PLS 2.0 ve SPSS programları aracılığı ile analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde faktör analizi ve korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak test edilen araştırma hipotezlerinin tamamı kabul edilmiştir. Farklı sektörlerdeki işletmelerin katılımı ile elde edilecek genişletilmiş veri setine rekabet ortamı, pazar dalgalanmaları gibi faktörlerin dahil edilmesi ile araştırma sonuçlarının genellenebilirliği artıracaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, V., KİTAPÇI, H., KARABAT, B. Ç. (2022). The Relationship between Organizational Learning Capacity, Ambidexterity, Environmental Dynamism and Innovation Performance. Bilgi Yönetimi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 239–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/858131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdallah, A. B., Dahiyat, S. E. ve Matsui, Y. (2019). Lean Management and Innovation Performance: Evidence from International Manufacturing Companies. Management Research Review, 42 (2), 239-262.
  2. Ahmad, F. ve Karim, M. (2019). Impacts of Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31, 207–230.
  3. Alsabbagh, M. ve Khalil, A. H. A. (2016). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational Learning: An Empirical Study on the Education Sector in Damascus City. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6 (5), 197-216.
  4. Argote, L. (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic. Argote, L. ve Ophir, R. (2002). Intraorganizational Learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Eds.), Companion to Organizations, (193–234).
  5. Blackwell Argyris, C. ve Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading. Addison Wesley Publishing Co. Auh. S. ve Menguc, B. (2004). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: the Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity. Journal of Business Research. 58 (12), 1652-1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  7. Berberoglu, A. (2018). Impact of Organizational Climate on Organizational Commitment and Perceived Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Public Hospitals. BMC Health Services Reseach, 18 (1), 399-408.
  8. Bocanet, A. ve Ponsiglione, C. (2012). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Complex Environments. The Journal of Information Knowledge Management Systems, 42 (1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721211207743
  9. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. ve Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20 (4), 781–796.
  10. Chege, S. M., Wang, D. ve Suntu, S. L. (2020) Impact of Information Technology Innovation on Firm Performance in Kenya, Information Technology for Development, 26 (2), 316-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1573717
  11. Cheryl, A. V. D. (1997). Organizational Learning in Acquisitions Wtihin The Hospitality Industry: Developing The Constructs of Exploration and Exploitation. University of South Carolina. Collins, C. J., ve Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-tech