Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

THE DEVELOPMENT OF EU CYBERSECURITY POLICY: FROM A COORDINATING ACTOR TO A CYBER POWER?

Avrupa Siber Güvenlik Politikasının Gelişimi: Eşgüdümcü Rol’den Siber Güce?

Pages
467–495
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Three strategy papers published by the European Commission in 2013, 2017, and 2020 are elaborated, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the article is to elaborate on the institutional and normative evolution of the European Union (EU) cybersecurity policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article primarily argues that the EU’s approach to cyberspace has recently focused on economic and security concerns.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Three strategy papers published by the European Commission in 2013, 2017, and 2020 are elaborated, respectively.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Siber Güç · Siber Güvenlik · Siber Uzay

Abstract

The aim of the article is to elaborate on the institutional and normative evolution of the European Union (EU) cybersecurity policy. The article primarily argues that the EU’s approach to cyberspace has recently focused on economic and security concerns. Secondly, the article contends that the actorness of the EU in the cyberspace has been evolved from a coordinating role to a more powerful one. The article is structured as follows: In the first part of the article, the literature on the EU’s actorness in cyberspace is reviewed. In the second part, the institutional and normative development of EU cybersecurity policy is evaluated. Three strategy papers published by the European Commission in 2013, 2017, and 2020 are elaborated, respectively.

Özet

Makalenin amacı, Avrupa Birliği (AB) siber güvenlik politikasının kurumsal ve normatif evrimini derinlemesine incelemektir. Makale, AB’nin siber uzaya yaklaşımının ekonomik ve güvenlik ile ilgili kaygılara odaklandığını ileri sürmektedir. İkinci olarak, AB’nin siber uzaydaki aktörlüğünün eşgüdümcü bir rolden siber güce doğru evrildiği makalede iddia edilmektedir. Makalenin içeriği şu şekildedir: İlk kısımda AB’nin siber uzaydaki aktörlüğü üzerine yapılmış olan araştırmalar üzerine bir değerlendirme yapılmaktadır. İkinci kısımda AB siber güvenlik politikasının kurumsal ve normatif gelişimi ele alınmaktadır. Makalenin geri kalanında Avrupa Komisyonu tarafından sırasıyla 2013, 2017 ve 2020’de yayımlanan üç siber güvenlik strateji belgesi ayrıntılı olarak incelenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

RENDA, K. K. (2022). THE DEVELOPMENT OF EU CYBERSECURITY POLICY: FROM A COORDINATING ACTOR TO A CYBER POWER?. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 467–495. https://ajindex.com/articles/857225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Backman, Sarah. “Risk vs. threat-based cybersecurity: the case of the EU.” European Security, Online first publication. Accessed date: December 16, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2069464. Barrinha, André and George Christou. “Speaking sovereignty: the EU in the cyber domain.” European Security, 31 no 3 (2022): 356-376. Accessed date: December 16, 2022, doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2102895. Bossong, Raphael. “The European Programme for the protection of critical infrastructures – meta-governing a new security problem?”. European Security, 23 no 2 (2014):210‒226. Accessed date: December 16, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09662839.2013.856307. Brandão, Ana P. and Isabel Camisão. “Playing the Market Card: The Commission’s Strategy to Shape EU Cybersecurity Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies, 60 no 5 (2022): 1335–1355. Accessed date: December 16, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13158.
  2. Buono, Laviero. “Gearing up the Fight against Cybercrime in the European Union: A New Set of Rules and the Establishment of the European Cybercrime Centre (Ec3).” New Journal of European Criminal Law, 3 no (3–4), 2012: 332–343. Accessed date: December 16, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441200300307
  3. Carrapico, Helena and André Barrinha. “European Union cyber security as an emerging research and policy field.” European Politics and Society, 19 no 3 (2018): 299–303. Accessed date: December 16, 2022, doi:10.1080/23745118.2018.1430712. Carrapico, Helena and André Barrinha. “The EU as a Coherent (Cyber)Security Actor?”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 no 6 (2017): 1254–1272. Accessed date: December 16, 20022, doi: 10.1111/jcms.12575. Csernatoni, Raluca. The EU’s rise as a defense technological power: from strategic autonomy to technological sovereignty, Carnegie Europe, 2021. Accessed date: December 16, 2022, https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/08/12/eu-s-rise-as-defense technological-power-from-strategic-autonomy-to-technological-sovereignty/$ Commission of the European Communities. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Globalisation and the Information Society: The Need for Strengthened Coordination, COM(1998) 50 final. Brussels, February 04, 1998. Accessed date: April 25, 2022, https://eur lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:51998DC0050&from=EN. 492 Commission of the European Communities. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Coun