Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AND THE CLIMATE-SECURITY NEXUS: CSDP MISSIONS AND OPERATIONS

Avrupa Birliği (AB) ve İklim-Güvenlik Bağıntısı: Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası (OGSP) Misyon ve Operasyonları Örneği

Pages
373–396
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper aims to analyze the impact of the climate-security nexus on the EU’s CSDP missions and operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the mid-2000s, the climate-security nexus has come to the forefront of scholarly debates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the practical level, the EU’s various policy tools have not yet incorporated climate-security nexus in their agenda.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper aims to analyze the impact of the climate-security nexus on the EU’s CSDP missions and operations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:OGSP · İklim Değişikliği · Güvenlik

Abstract

Since the mid-2000s, the climate-security nexus has come to the forefront of scholarly debates. For some scholars, the linkages between climate change and security should be analyzed from the national security perspective, whereas others from a human security perspective. Taking into consideration the implications of climate change on national and human security, international organizations worldwide started to develop policies in this field. The EU acknowledges climaterelated security risks and searches for new policies and tools to respond to them. Yet, the EU’s efforts remain mainly at the discursive level. On the practical level, the EU’s various policy tools have not yet incorporated climate-security nexus in their agenda. This paper aims to analyze the impact of the climate-security nexus on the EU’s CSDP missions and operations.

Özet

2000’li yılların ortalarından itibaren, iklim-güvenlik bağıntısı akademik tartışmaların ön saflarına yerleşmiştir. Bazı araştırmacılar iklim değişikliği ve güvenlik bağıntısını ulusal güvenlik perspektifinden incelerken, diğer araştırmacılar insan güvenliği perspektifine odaklanmıştır. İklim değişikliğinin ulusal güvenlik ve insan güvenliğine dair etkilerini dikkate alan uluslararası örgütler de iklim değişikliği ile ilişkili risklere yönelik politikalar geliştirmeye başlamıştır. AB, iklim ile ilişkili güvenlik risklerini kabul etmiş ve bu risklere cevaben çeşitli politika ve araç arayışına girmiştir. Ancak, AB’nin çabalarının büyük ölçüde söylemsel düzeyde kaldığı söylenebilir. Uygulama düzeyinde, AB’nin çeşitli politika araçlarının ajandaları hala iklim-güvenlik bağıntısını içermiş değildir. Bu çalışma, iklim-güvenlik bağıntısının AB’nin OGSP misyon ve operasyonlarına yönelik etkisini analiz etmek niyetindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A. G. (2022). THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AND THE CLIMATE-SECURITY NEXUS: CSDP MISSIONS AND OPERATIONS. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 373–396. https://ajindex.com/articles/857221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abshir, Sagal, “Climate-Fragility Policy Paper, Climate Change and Security in the Horn of Africa: Can Europe Help to Reduce the Risks”, Climate Security Expert Network (Berlin, Adelphi, 2021) Retrieved on 30 August 2021 from https://climate-security-expert-network.org/ sites/climate-security-expert network.com/files/documents/csen_policy_paper_climate_change_and_securit y_in_the_horn_of_africa.pdf. Adger, W. Neil, “Vulnerability”, Global Environmental Change 16 (2006): 268-281
  2. Allison, Roy, “New Thinking About Defence in the Soviet Union”. In New Thinking on Strategy and International Security, edited by Ken Booth, (London: Harper Collins, 1991)
  3. Barnett, Jon, The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era (New York: Zed Books, 2001).
  4. Barnett, Jon, “Security and Climate Change”, Global Environmental Change 13 (2003): 7-17
  5. Baysal, Başar & Uluç Karakaş, Climate Change and Security, Different Perceptions, Different Approaches, Uluslararası İlişkiler 14, no 54(2017): 21-44.
  6. Bilgin, Pınar, “Individual and Societal Dimensions of Security”, International Studies Review 5 (2003): 203-222.
  7. Bogdanovski, Andreja & Uros Zivkovic, The future of International Police Missions in the New Global Security Environment - Contribution of Western Balkans Police Forces to EU’s International Policing. (Belgrade Center for Security Policy, 2016).
  8. Booth, Ken, “Security and Emancipation”, Review of International Studies, 17, no 4 (1991): 313-326,
  9. Brandao, Ana Paula, “The Internal-External Security Nexus in the security narrative of the European Union”, JANUS.NET e-journal of International Relations 6, no 1(2015): 1-19.
  10. Bremberg, Niklas and Malin Mobjörk European Union steps up its efforts to become the global leader on addressing climate-related security risks, SIPRI Essay (2018). Retrieved on 3 October 2021 from https://www.sipri.org/commentary/essay/2018/european-union-steps-its efforts-become-global-leader-addressing-climate-related-security-risks Brown, Lester, “Redefining National Security”, Worldwatch Paper No 14 (1977).
  11. Brown, Oli, Climate-Fragility Risk Brief. Afghanistan, Climate-Security Expert Network, (Adelphi, Berlin, 2019). Retrieved on 26 September 2021 from https://climate-security-expert-network.org/sites/climate-security-expert- 392network.com/files/documents/csen_climate_fragility_risk_brief_- _afghanistan_0.pdf Brown, Oli, “Climate-Fragility Risk Brief, North Africa and Sahel”, Climate Security Expert Network, (Adelp